bump for great justice!
so guys, I've been running A LOT and also experimenting a ton lately. So basically for the past 3 years I have been blindly following my coach whose belief is that invervals make champions (i made a thread some years back about training, and I was shocked by people like 5krunner telling me to up the mileage to 40 iles per week--I thought they meant 40 mpw of 400 and 200 meter repeats!), so I've had 3 years of 20 mpw of constant sprinting. in anatomy class, I read about two dudes, jack daniels and arthur lydiard, and their training methods. since i'm a 800/1600 guy, I naturally was interested in this concept of an aerobic base that they both preached about. i eagerly told myself that as soon as summer started i'd get running right away.
I'm not terribly fast, so bear with my paces. I originally had a plan of upping mileage by ridiculous amounts very quickly (i.e. jumping from my usual 20 to 75+ in a few weeks). I felt fine during the runs, but after my first super high week (78 mpw) I just felt like shit the next week and decided that i had jumped too fast. so I then decided to start low and increase by 5 mpw until I reached around 50, at which point I would increase by 10% unless my body told me otherwise. I got to around 35 mpw and found myself exhausted by paces as slow as 9+ mm (minutes per mile). To be frank, I was just not enjoying it. What frustrated me further was that in the beginning I could run at paces like 5:30 mm and slowing down felt like a chore. a half hour later, I'd look at my watch and it'd tell me 9:30 and i'd feel the exact same as i felt during the 5:30 pace! very discouraging indeed.
so I decided to experiment a little more. I started to run by time rather than distance, using a basic plan of an hour monday, an hour and a half tuesday, an hour wednesday, an hour and a half to two hours thursday, depending on how i felt, an hour friday, 2+ hours saturday, and an hour and a half sunday. I told myself I could do these because during my original super fast buildup, I did such ridiculous things as 20 mile runs which took me longer than 3 hours. 2 hours once a week would not kill me, and I was very used to running for an hour or more. I started very conservatively, running 10+ minutes per mile, which amazingly enough still totaled me at 55 miles per week on the first week, feeling 100 times better than even the 35 mile week that I had only a week before! I decided to continue, and figured the mileage would increase naturally as I got fitter (since by putting in the same effort, I would go faster and thus for more miles in the given time). this worked for me very well, and with motivation provided by some really fast guys here in Greece (we're talking sub 4:15 milers and 14:00 5kers), I seem to have come a long way in a short time.
It hasn't been without some stupidity on my part. My shoes are kind of bulky and "have a lot of arch support" and all that bs, and they always hurt my feet a little. I figured this would go away and it was always bearable. Anyways. Last week I ran about 70 miles using the run by time schedule (equates to just over 8:00 mm), my legs felt great, I'm getting better quickly without additional effort, etc. But my feet hurt a lot more than normal. So this week (yesterday), I decided to try and go out barefoot. During the run, my feet felt great. A little cut up, it seemed, but that was to be expected since my skin was not used to concrete. well, I noticed at the end of my run that while my feet no longer hurt (i.e. the pain i felt while running in the shoes--impact related type pain), I now have a total of 6 blisters on the bottom of each foot (all in the same spots, my feet are the same shape and thus, I assume, have made blisters in the same places). to give you a better idea, one of them is 3 inches long (I kid you not) and they essentially cover my entire foot except for the very top of the arch. And my feet were incredibly dirty, so scrubbing them clean was a bit of an ordeal (i'd like to see any of you guys trying to scrub blisters as huge as mine). Today, I'm finding it difficult to walk due to the pain of these, and it's helped me realize how stupid a decision I made.
anyways, I walked to the local store and bought pool shoes today. Here is my reasoning: they provide zero arch support or any of that, since they're not designed for it (i.e. they are very close to barefoot, they don't force your foot into a position--kind of like track spikes or racing flats, which I normally train in but did not bring along this summer). so they are the shape that doesn't force my foot to contort and give it the achy, impact type pain that my shoes give. they are also durable and waterproof, so they keep my thin skin from the roughness of the road, provide some protection from pebbles, etc. essentially they're like socks with treads. I figure once my blisters heal and my feet allow me to run again, I'll give them ago. hopefully I wont be out for more than a few days to maybe a week.
so yeah, anybody have an opinion on the pool shoes? at 6 euros a pair, I can replace them every 2 weeks or so, so they'll last me until I get home to my traditional shoes. it just seems wacky I guess to be using them for something they weren't designed for but I really don't see why not.