Serious when is violence acceptable?

Steel With It said:
Let's ask Richard Collins, Timothy Caughman, Ricky Best, Taliesin Namkai-Meche, Buckley Kuhn-Fricker, Scott Fricker, Cynthia Hurd, Susie Jackson, Ethel Lance, Depayne Middleton-Doctor, Clementa Pinckney, Tywanza Sanders, Daniel Simmons, Sharonda Coleman-Singleton, Myra Thompson, Gerald Fischman, Rob Hiaasen, John McNamara, Rebecca Smith, Wendi Winters, Renuka Amarasinghe, Mary Forsythe, Andrea Bradden, Eddie Kang, Ji Hun Kim, Sohe Chung, Munir Najjar, Anne-Marie D'Amico, Geraldine Brady, Dorothy Sewell, Nabra Hassanen and Heather Heyer how violent those spooky scary SJWs are.

Oh, wait. We can't. Because they were murdered by Nazis.

And this isn't even the full list.
Click to expand...
I looked up like half of these and they had nothing to do with "nazis" lmfao one was killed by an illegal immigrant. Try harder
 
My Christian faith and its Buddhist influences on me would normally give me a "never". That being said, anyone that knows how my country is passing through a heavy and sad turn to the extreme right knows how hard the situation is and how equally impossible it is to maintain a pacifist philosophy. Since this Sunday, over 50 attacks aimed at people that did not vote on the extreme right candidate happened, most of them that ended with death or severe injuries. There was even a woman that was carved with a swastika. This will get much worse if the extreme right wins this end of October. I will never kill anyone, but if I see someone doing that, especially if against someone of my closest circle, then I may do what Jesus did in the Temple.

kilometerman said:
Haha he doesn't like genocide haha what a rightist wait till r/cth hears about this!
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
Don Honchkrorleone said:
Since this Sunday, over 50 attacks aimed at people that did not vote on the extreme right candidate happened, most of them that ended with death or severe injuries. There was even a woman that was carved with a swastika.
Click to expand...
"Source: my ass"

edit he's talking about brazil but shouldnt you make that distinction
 
Last edited:
kilometerman said:
"Source: my ass"
Click to expand...
I mean, you're obviously so smart that you can't waste your high intellect to Google, so I, as the working illiterate, will only give one example:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...onaro-supporters-carved-SWASTIKA-stomach.html

_103807200_8ac22949-fbe3-486c-aaf8-8d795842cb86.jpg

And for all the good-natured man that can realize synapsis here (which clearly kilometerman can't) and aren't up for the derailing of this thread, the attack was dismissed by the local authorities not because of it being an attack, the police actually claimed it was not the nazist symbol but instead the Buddhist symbol of peace. Now tell me, should we be quiet about that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EV
Self-defense only.

In the OP's case, violence is an even worse option than usual. It is practically like proving his point, because instead of using logical counterarguments... you attack him.

I'll let DBZ Abridged Tien explain (at the end):

 
So, there's now a serial mail bomber targeting Democrats, media outlets and other people Trump's attacked. Up to ten bombs so far.

BoTh SiDeS, right?
 
GatoDelFuego said:
ok, can you find me people that say this is acceptable behavior?
Click to expand...
There was a guy called Bhagat Singh in India who used to hatch plots to assassinate and blow up English officers and bureaucrats during the colonial times. He is a national motherfucking hero today. There are a litany of movies and video games (Inglorious Basterds, Valkyrie, Elite Sniper etc) which glorify the fantasy of killing/blowing up Hitler in all sorts of gruesome ways. Standard US foreign policy unleashes unmanned drones unloading targeted bombs in villages and cities across the middle east on a daily basis to eliminate "threats to national security".

Trust me, way more people are completely fine with blowing up other people than your rhetorical question indicates. We willingly turn off our moral filters if enough of us agree (or are made to agree) that the person on the receiving end is evil/dangerous enough to warrant it.

If you want to find people who find this particular instance of this behavior acceptable I invite you to visit /b/, /pol/ and the_donald discord channel.
 
Soul Fly said:
There was a guy called Bhagat Singh in India who used to hatch plots to assassinate and blow up English officers and bureaucrats during the colonial times. He is a national motherfucking hero today. There are a litany of movies and video games (Inglorious Basterds, Valkyrie, Elite Sniper etc) which glorify the fantasy of killing/blowing up Hitler in all sorts of gruesome ways. Standard US foreign policy unleashes unmanned drones unloading targeted bombs in villages and cities across the middle east on a daily basis to eliminate "threats to national security".

Trust me, way more people are completely fine with blowing up other people than your rhetorical question indicates. We willingly turn off our moral filters if enough of us agree (or are made to agree) that the person on the receiving end is evil/dangerous enough to warrant it.

If you want to find people who find this particular instance of this behavior acceptable I invite you to visit /b/, /pol/ and the_donald discord channel.
Click to expand...
Could just as well be an advertising stunt to raise victim status for pity votes
 
rau said:
Could just as well be an advertising stunt to raise victim status for pity votes
Click to expand...
that's essentially the conclusion the top minds over at /pol/ have arrived at. Soros and MSM pulling out all the stops to gaslight the american population. you sir are a man of fine sensibilities.
 
Steel With It said:
5viX49X.png


Here's one. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Click to expand...
Ah yes, the old "THE CNN BOMBER IS AN AMERICAN HERO! KEEP IT UP!" from the Donald ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You're the one that brought these bombings up, as a way to say that only the right wing attempts such measures, it's not "both sides". What's your point? Are you trying to say that violence against right wing extremists is justified because of incidents like this?
 
GatoDelFuego said:
Are you trying to say that violence against right wing extremists is justified because of incidents like this?
Click to expand...

He's saying that Trump has successfully cultivated a subculture of violence. We're angry. Clean up the mainstream media.

Now you could say others hate these fascists just as much, but where are the pipe bombs in the fascist's mail?
 
Myzozoa said:
which violence against rightwing extremists are you referring to GatoDelFuego

brought that up from nowhere
Click to expand...
nobody in particular. Richard spencer, maybe, makes a good example, though it's a stretch to use that as a comparison. The question of the thread is "is political violence acceptable?" Steel with it brought up the mail bombs and tied it to the "both sides" quote, and my question is why?

Sure, rightwing extremists are committing the vast majority of terrorism/political violence in the county. But who's condoning it? The question I asked steel with it is "do these attempted bombings justify violence against right wing extremists?", before he decided to have a meltdown
 
GatoDelFuego said:
Sure, rightwing extremists are committing the vast majority of terrorism/political violence in the county. But who's condoning it? The question I asked steel with it is "do these attempted bombings justify violence against right wing extremists?", before he decided to have a meltdown
Click to expand...


1. Being confused at you and laughing at the conspiracy theorists is not "Having a meltdown."

2. Ah, so that's why you deleted my post, so you could lie and try to make it sound like I said "Yes." For the record, all, I said "No."

3. She, not he. Just FYI.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top