Serious The Politics Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

I for one like Fox News for these 5000 IQ dating strats.
Just another day on that network. Meanwhile many parents and grandparents are completely hooked on this bullshit. They need deprogramming.

tl;dr the Democrats are favored. But as RaikouLover will enthusiastically say, the polls aren't perfect. A lot of analysis show the Democrats absolutely clapping Trump's cheeks with 300-320 E-votes. But then we all have PTSD from 2016 so...
Rasmussen’s latest poll was to the left of NYTimes / Siena (“A+”). For those unfamiliar, Rasmussen is a Republican polling firm so far to the right it was dropped from polling aggregates like 538. Well, The NY Times just outdid them. Rasmussen rep said The NY Times sampled too many Trump voters.

Well, no shit. Do we need any more evidence that the political polling industry is a shitstorm designed to perpetuate a horse race the media desperately needs to survive? If either candidate were headed to a blowout victory would there be much public consumption of the election?

Fuck the New York Times. Shoutout to the Democratic Party this cycle for again being naive enough to base their campaign decisions on the media having integrity. Maybe one day the Democrats will wake up.
 
Sure israel killed civilians in a terroristic mass bombing, but have you considered that the people ruling them are bad and that makes it ok. Feels like we get into the same traps every-time with Israel. The same people who cry whenever somebody doesn’t say they hate Hamas in every sentence will then justify terrorism done by Israel because they don’t like the political group/government Israel pretends it was attacking.
 
I'm genuinely curious and don't know much about politics, won't Trump and Kamala use the same policies about Israel that Biden did?
Important point of distinction in US-Isreal relationship, I think both Trump and Isreal believe that Iran and the terrorist organizations they support cannot be negotiationed with in good faith.
Democratics have shown more willingness to talk with Iran and terrorists organizations. Kamala would be similar to Biden in this aspect which Isreal does not favor.
 
Interesting video regarding the war in Gaza. Fair outlook for the most part
Strong disagree, for one very explicit reason.

The use of high yield explosive bombs and missiles in a small area with a huge population density.

Gaza has had over 75,000 tonnes of bombs and missiles dropped on it. The sheer destruction of civilian infrastructure clearly points to a significantly higher death toll.

Important point of distinction in US-Isreal relationship, I think both Trump and Isreal believe that Iran and the terrorist organizations they support cannot be negotiationed with in good faith.
Democratics have shown more willingness to talk with Iran and terrorists organizations. Kamala would be similar to Biden in this aspect which Isreal does not favor.
This is in fairness a good point. They do believe that.

But then every accusation from that side of the table is an admittance of guilt.
 
Alright, I have gotten a poor night's sleep and I'm ready to tackle the absolute white western liberal buffoonery Bughouse was spewing. Love when people whose whole experience is just reading wikipedia articles and online debate bro bullshit try to talk about why things are the way they are.

Israel and Hamas is an entirely separate conflict from Israel and Hezbollah for quite obvious reasons.
Untrue. Different facets of the same colonial conflict, which arises from white westerners drawing lines on a map and deciding "this belongs to us now." The sectarian conflicts in Lebanon are a direct result of French colonialism empowering the Maronites to have majority power over everything and zionist interference in Lebanon in support of the Maronites. Hezbollah's formation was a direct result of isr*eli meddling in Lebanon and backing the Maronites in attempting to maintain French and western colonial influence, which was opposed by literally everybody else, from the Muslim fundamentalists to the Marxists to the Druze to Palestinian refugees (I should note that a lot of Druze and Palestinian people were leftist and secularist in outlook), who all allied against the colonizers and their puppets. The civil war's flashpoint was Kataeb (right wing Christian party) supporters massacring Palestinians, to call it "entirely separate" is a fucking joke when Hezbollah only formed due to the zionist invasion which only occurred because of colonialism and because of the genocidal state on the border.

Fun fact about Kataeb - did you know they modeled themselves after the Francoists and Mussolini, wore brown shirts, and did the nazi salute? This was the party that was the leading force in the coalition between Lebanese Christian militias and isr*el. Literally cannot get more white- and western-influenced than that.

There is not a remotely legitimate argument that Israel's conflict with Hezbollah in Lebanon is genocidal. I will generously assume you are referring to Gaza here, even though literally nothing else in your post points that direction. But if you truly believe Israel's strikes in Lebanon are "genocidal" you are just off your rocker.
Focusing their bombings on the areas where Palestinian refugees are congregated, which I pointed out in my very short post, is genocidal, but good job twisting my words because of your lack of reading comprehension.

I have a LOT of sympathy for Palestinians who have a fair case for never really having been given a fair shot at success. I have a lot less sympathy for Lebanon which really could/should have been a thriving pluralistic democracy but has instead consistently embraced sectarian conflict and as a result has gradually fully ceded control of its country to Hezbollah.
Your sympathy for Palestinians apparently doesn't extend to doing anything to support them or to them going to Lebanon without being bombed further. As for Lebanon, how the fuck "should" it have been thriving when it was a colonial holding until less than 100 years ago and even after getting "independence" in name it was still controlled by a cabal of corrupt French-backed Maronites while the west and the zionists and Syria and everyone else have outsized influence in Lebanese politics? "Embraced" sectarian conflict my ass, the fucking westerners and isr*elis and Maronite elites fanned the flames and kept massacring people they didn't like while refusing to give any sort of fair representation to Muslims, Druze, or left-wing secular parties.

Make no mistake that a democratic Lebanon would not be firing missiles into Israel "in sympathy" with Gazans
Using "democratic" as a synonym for "Christians retaking pre-civil war levels of power" is certainly a choice when the Maronite political dynasties were repeatedly outed as flagrantly corrupt. A Christian-controlled Lebanon would have happily aided the genocide, and this was one of the motivating factors behind the civil war - Muslim and Druze citizens supported Palestinians while Christians wanted them dead or exiled, and repeatedly massacred them in an attempt to drive them out. I suppose that means you're right, though - your dogwhistle version of Lebanon that's controlled by white western interests would definitely be supporting the genocide-doers.

, as Lebanese citizens understand these are separate conflicts.
You have zero fucking clue what "Lebanese citizens" think. Lumping all citizens together in such a sectarian nation is fucking stupid, for one thing - most Muslims and Druze support Palestinians and see this as a connected struggle while most Christians support the west, but everyone and their mother can see these are intertwined conflicts. Stop ascribing your uninformed view to a whole population that you've never interacted with.

And what do you propose Israel is meant to do in regards to 100,000 Israelis being displaced due to Hezbollah's missiles? Full on war again like 2006?
I've been very clear - if they want to stop being bombed, stop stealing land and get the fuck out. We both know it won't happen - there is nothing the genocidal settler-state is "meant to do" but not fucking exist, and I condemn every single thing they ever do because all of it will always be in service of colonial violence.

Your number is made up both because that number is actually a lowball estimate for how many Lebanese people the zionists have displaced, and because just saying "displaced" leaves out the context that this is displacing colonizers from the land they are occupying, which is good, actually. How many Palestinian and Lebanese people are currently displaced? That's an actual bad thing, unlike colonizers being driven out of land that they don't belong on and that they're destroying. Have you seen the videos of zionist colonizers burning and chopping down olive trees? They don't even have respect for the land they're displacing people off of. It's disgusting and cruel behavior that's going to leave Palestine ecologically devastated for decades if not centuries, even once the fascists are driven out. May they all be displaced sooner rather than later, right back to their European roots, and hopefully the land can be restored again.

Also, all of you fucking libs keep coming back to painting this as a conflict between the zionist state and Hamas or Hezbollah. It is not. The zionist state is and has been committing genocide against Palestinians, regardless of creed, affiliation, religion, or location. The zionist state is hostile to all Lebanese people except for the far-right Christians, and their scope of murder, invasion, and cruelty goes much further than just "fighting Hezbollah." It's a much more convenient narrative for you all to keep framing it as "isr*el (legitimate state defending itself) vs insert-terrorist-faction-here (whatever faction can be delegitimized and painted as wantonly cruel, uncalculated, and morally evil)" but that's not how the world works. Stop speaking on things you don't actually understand.
 
Love when the right-wing squad all post together to go “are you saying you want to kill all Jews?????” to do the disingenuous “anyone who supports Palestine is an antisemite” shit. I’ve repeatedly pointed out how zionist settler-colonialism harmed Palestinian Jews too, who are more than welcome in Palestine both in my view and in the view of many Palestinians so long as they aren’t cooperating with the genocide state. More important than anything else is completely depowering the theocratic colonizer government and returning power to the hands of actual Palestinians - the solution to what to do with the colonizers is more complicated and I just say “all colonizers gtfo,” as shorthand but yeah, probably a lot of them will have to be kicked out because inevitably they will just continue doing the same terrorism their ancestors did 80 years prior and trying to reestablish their genocidal state, as colonizers do. The absolute bare minimum is ensuring they have absolutely zero power and returning the land to its rightful stewards.

And no, deporting colonizers from the land they stole is not genocide. Palestinians have the right to fight back and zionists have no right to exist on stolen land, but you know this and just like to justify genocide in whatever way you can while maintaining a thin layer of plausible deniability.

edit: well 2/3 of the apologists got deleted and so this is now missing some context but whatever
 
Alright, I have gotten a poor night's sleep and I'm ready to tackle the absolute white western liberal buffoonery Bughouse was spewing. Love when people whose whole experience is just reading wikipedia articles and online debate bro bullshit try to talk about why things are the way they are.


Untrue. Different facets of the same colonial conflict, which arises from white westerners drawing lines on a map and deciding "this belongs to us now." The sectarian conflicts in Lebanon are a direct result of French colonialism empowering the Maronites to have majority power over everything and zionist interference in Lebanon in support of the Maronites. Hezbollah's formation was a direct result of isr*eli meddling in Lebanon and backing the Maronites in attempting to maintain French and western colonial influence, which was opposed by literally everybody else, from the Muslim fundamentalists to the Marxists to the Druze to Palestinian refugees (I should note that a lot of Druze and Palestinian people were leftist and secularist in outlook), who all allied against the colonizers and their puppets. The civil war's flashpoint was Kataeb (right wing Christian party) supporters massacring Palestinians, to call it "entirely separate" is a fucking joke when Hezbollah only formed due to the zionist invasion which only occurred because of colonialism and because of the genocidal state on the border.

Fun fact about Kataeb - did you know they modeled themselves after the Francoists and Mussolini, wore brown shirts, and did the nazi salute? This was the party that was the leading force in the coalition between Lebanese Christian militias and isr*el. Literally cannot get more white- and western-influenced than that.


Focusing their bombings on the areas where Palestinian refugees are congregated, which I pointed out in my very short post, is genocidal, but good job twisting my words because of your lack of reading comprehension.


Your sympathy for Palestinians apparently doesn't extend to doing anything to support them or to them going to Lebanon without being bombed further. As for Lebanon, how the fuck "should" it have been thriving when it was a colonial holding until less than 100 years ago and even after getting "independence" in name it was still controlled by a cabal of corrupt French-backed Maronites while the west and the zionists and Syria and everyone else have outsized influence in Lebanese politics? "Embraced" sectarian conflict my ass, the fucking westerners and isr*elis and Maronite elites fanned the flames and kept massacring people they didn't like while refusing to give any sort of fair representation to Muslims, Druze, or left-wing secular parties.


Using "democratic" as a synonym for "Christians retaking pre-civil war levels of power" is certainly a choice when the Maronite political dynasties were repeatedly outed as flagrantly corrupt. A Christian-controlled Lebanon would have happily aided the genocide, and this was one of the motivating factors behind the civil war - Muslim and Druze citizens supported Palestinians while Christians wanted them dead or exiled, and repeatedly massacred them in an attempt to drive them out. I suppose that means you're right, though - your dogwhistle version of Lebanon that's controlled by white western interests would definitely be supporting the genocide-doers.


You have zero fucking clue what "Lebanese citizens" think. Lumping all citizens together in such a sectarian nation is fucking stupid, for one thing - most Muslims and Druze support Palestinians and see this as a connected struggle while most Christians support the west, but everyone and their mother can see these are intertwined conflicts. Stop ascribing your uninformed view to a whole population that you've never interacted with.


I've been very clear - if they want to stop being bombed, stop stealing land and get the fuck out. We both know it won't happen - there is nothing the genocidal settler-state is "meant to do" but not fucking exist, and I condemn every single thing they ever do because all of it will always be in service of colonial violence.

Your number is made up both because that number is actually a lowball estimate for how many Lebanese people the zionists have displaced, and because just saying "displaced" leaves out the context that this is displacing colonizers from the land they are occupying, which is good, actually. How many Palestinian and Lebanese people are currently displaced? That's an actual bad thing, unlike colonizers being driven out of land that they don't belong on and that they're destroying. Have you seen the videos of zionist colonizers burning and chopping down olive trees? They don't even have respect for the land they're displacing people off of. It's disgusting and cruel behavior that's going to leave Palestine ecologically devastated for decades if not centuries, even once the fascists are driven out. May they all be displaced sooner rather than later, right back to their European roots, and hopefully the land can be restored again.

Also, all of you fucking libs keep coming back to painting this as a conflict between the zionist state and Hamas or Hezbollah. It is not. The zionist state is and has been committing genocide against Palestinians, regardless of creed, affiliation, religion, or location. The zionist state is hostile to all Lebanese people except for the far-right Christians, and their scope of murder, invasion, and cruelty goes much further than just "fighting Hezbollah." It's a much more convenient narrative for you all to keep framing it as "isr*el (legitimate state defending itself) vs insert-terrorist-faction-here (whatever faction can be delegitimized and painted as wantonly cruel, uncalculated, and morally evil)" but that's not how the world works. Stop speaking on things you don't actually understand.
I note you went off on many tangents and didn't make a single rebuttal to the simple factual point I was making in my post that the beloved UN consistently has sided with Israel and against Hezbollah in this conflict. How bad do you imagine Hezbollah has to be for the ****ing UN to believe Israel is actually in the right in a dispute?

But please keep apologizing for Hezbollah. They have quite literally destroyed Lebanon for everyone who lives there regardless of ethnicity or religion and they were likewise involved in supporting Assad too in the Syrian Civil War. I'm not opposed to Hezbollah because oh no they are mean to Lebanese Christians and Israelis as you seem to want to ascribe motivations to me. I'm opposed to Hezbollah because they are absolutely awful to everyone and Lebanon is a failed state because of them.

The only reason the UN has not actively been engaged in conflict with Hezbollah these many years is that in its resolutions requiring Lebanon to disarm militias and creating UNIFIL did not unilaterally give UNIFIL power under Chapter 7 to engage in this conflict to disarm Hezbollah but rather only under Chapter 6 to assist Lebanon, when requested, in this conflict, which shockingly Lebanon never asks UNIFIL to do, since Lebanon is de facto controlled by Hezbollah. UNIFIL privately regrets this, though they can't publicly disparage their mission.
 
May they all be displaced sooner rather than later, right back to their European roots
All I said was that only about 30% of the population actual had these European roots to be sent back to. And you know this. It's very convenient to pretend that all jews are white westerners because it conveniently deletes the fact that they also have an ancestral claim to the land, but i guess once your skin becomes white your "rightful land" is Europe now. I hate bringing up ancestral claims because it's a really stupid argument structure that is exclusively used in hypocritical ways, but since so many of your arguments hinge on the Palestinian ancestral claim i'll mention it.
 
many israeli settlers have dual citizenship, and a nontrivial number actually have left over the past year ish, ofc not generally because of political principles just wealthier settlers who have resources and when reality has come up against the mythology that they are not risking any aspect of their personal safety by actively enabling a genocide; ofc not all do. idt this is rly the point tho.

the sentence that n1n1 replied to is pointing to the material fact that actions have consequences. if one lives as a settler and by means of that class position are directly enabling genocide, and live off the spoils of that genocide, one cannot then complain about being 'unsafe.' its somewhat 'like' in the "us" kkkops whining about the safety of their "jobs" (and fash propaganda using that 'lack of safety' to justify more militarization and escalations.) it is a part of the class position. to be an settler colonist in an active genocide and also complain about safety is like "having your cake and eating it too" or whatever the English phrase is.

as has been brought up a few times before, the 'rights-based framework' of the UN etc is very inadequate and this is an example of that. the un can say that "civilian" israeli settlers "should" have the "right to security", but such security ultimately comes in conflict with the right of the occupied to self defense.

while the vast majority of israeli settlers actively support and many actively participate in the palestinian genocide, idt anyone is claiming that it is 100%, that is rly not the point. if one is in the class position of being an israeli settler and is genuinely in support of antizionism but is stuck there atm for xyz reasons (this is v clearly an extremely small portion of the settler colony, maybe a couple hundred ppl? cant possibly be more than a thousand or two i mean we all see the current material conditions of the settler society and while there are various significant divisions there is no substantial division whatosever on the question of zionism and therefore of the palestinian genocide); anyway if one is in that position one has to accept the reality that your own ideological orientation does not change your material position. and that just as they benefit from the spoils of zionist settler colonialism and their ideological beliefs cannot change that, they are materially a part of the 'class enemy' of palestinian liberation and the risks that come with that.
 
I ignored the UN thing because when have I ever said anything that implies I give a single shit about what the UN thinks? How do you think this is a gotcha when I’ve repeatedly made it clear how few fucks I give about the opinions of the west and international organizations that prop up colonialism? It’s a complete non-argument to me, and you appeal to their authority because it fits your liberal worldview.

All I said was that only about 30% of the population actual had these European roots to be sent back to. And you know this. It's very convenient to pretend that all jews are white westerners because it conveniently deletes the fact that they also have an ancestral claim to the land, but i guess once your skin becomes white your "rightful land" is Europe now. I hate bringing up ancestral claims because it's a really stupid argument structure that is exclusively used in hypocritical ways, but since so many of your arguments hinge on the Palestinian ancestral claim i'll mention it.
I have repeatedly validated the claim of Palestinian Jewish people to exist on the land, and I would like the colonizers kicked out. Nothing in this contradicts what you said, and no, European Jewish people do not have a claim to Palestine, you cannot just pull out “Judaism originated in the middle east ergo all Jewish people have a claim to be there” any more than you could use that to justify Christian interference and colonization. You can of course talk about how Judaism has an ethnic component and not just a religious component but no, not every single Jewish person has an ancestral claim, and there are plenty of other arguments to make including their horrific mistreatment of the land, the coordinated mass land buys with the stated goal of achieving a majority to then exile all Palestinians, the use of militias to terrorize and massacre people when there were already Palestinian people of several religions, Jews included, living peacefully on the land, the “land without a people” genocidal rhetoric, and far more to point out that the seizure of Palestine was political opportunism and not remotely based in some kind of return to their home. Just because the solutions aren’t perfectly clean and easy with clear lines doesn’t mean the problem of a genocidal settler-colony doesn’t need to be handled or can be dismissed with “well some of them were there before they had the backing of a genocidal state and its torture/rape camps”
 
Ima try to post in a simple fashion, how I think the east coasters who pretend in their posts on a pokemon forum to understand 'geopolitics' and power dynamics between distant countries might understand:

When America gets bogged down in resource intensive overseas conflicts because of Zionism amidst the coming turbulence of climate change, our state is not gonna be able to provide security for our fat 401k. While you prattle on in posts about making 'wars' on "Hezbollah" and "Hamas" and "UN resolutions", the CCP are laughing themselves all the way to a 'peaceful rise', Putin is smilin that you've volunteered for his propaganda outlet, and their close friend Ron DeSantis is plotting how to do the least amount of shit to help you in the next natural disaster. Hope this helps next time you're trying to figure out whether you have to go along w it when the Zionists tell the UN they have no choice but to make terrorism in another country.
 
Israel has the same right to exist as Nazi Germany or Apartheid South Africa which is none.

I let a lot of this thread slide because I understand how far left some of you are and I don’t mind hearing your opinions but I feel like blatant anti-semitism has no place, and I’m appalled that you feel so comfortable to share this opinion and that some of you “love” this post really shows your character. Comparing Israel to Nazi Germany where they murdered 6 million + gypsies and Jews is truly one of all time.

Israel has existed for over 4000 years. There are 22 Arab countries, over 150 Christian majority countries, and there is 1 jewish country.

Many of those Arab Countries kicked out there Jews in 1948 and years prior, some 700,000+

During the Holocaust, Jews had no safe haven and over 50% of the world’s jews were murdered. If there was another Holocaust, where would the Jewish people go? This is why Israel became a country.

I’m not going to sit here and defend Israel’s actions but to say Jews do not deserve a state is anti-semitic and disgusting. Do better.
 
isr*el has existed for barely 80 years and you don't get to just establish a country on top of millions of dead Palestinians because "Jewish people deserve a majority country," take land from the fucking European colonizers instead and give it to them.

During the Holocaust, Jews had no safe haven and over 50% of the world’s jews were murdered. If there was another Holocaust, where would the Jewish people go? This is why Israel became a country.
Blatant lie, it became a country because a bunch of zionist militias committed thousands of terrorist attacks against Palestinians of all religions and then the usa saw a chance to make a useful ally out of them to establish a stronghold in the region.

If you want accountability for the Holocaust then ask it of the blatantly antisemitic Europeans rather than justifying the mass murder of Palestinians. Your opinion is disgusting and is the actual antisemitic one; zionism was opposed by the vast majority of Jewish people in its early days and relies on antisemitism to function as an ideology.

Also, maybe don't throw around slurs for Romani people.
 
I’m not going to sit here and defend Israel’s actions but to say Jews do not deserve a state is anti-semitic and disgusting. Do better.

This is either an incredibly unintelligent or incredibly bad-faith reading of their point. The argument is "Jews do not deserve a state built on stolen land and enforced through apartheid and genocide". You would probably know this if you had read any of the other posts in this thread by decolonization advocates instead of hyperfocusing on one quippy line and separating it from all of its context. Do better.
 
jewish people don't "deserve" israel in the same way no religion "deserves" an ethnonationalist country to appeal to them. Half of the countries that are christian either officially or culturally dont deserve to exist either because they come from colonization and genocide, and people will gladly talk about islamic theocracies, so I don't know why israel is suddenly some given right to jewish prople.

Also to be frank, if israel doesn't want to be compared to nazism, maybe they should just stop doing nazi shit :blobshrug:
 
I’m not going to sit here and defend Israel’s actions but to say Jews do not deserve a state is anti-semitic and disgusting. Do better.
Like it or not, Israel is a settler-colony. A state created explicitly as a colony. Just because an Israel existed 4000 years ago doesn't (and never has) give Israeli settlers the right to evict Palestinians from their own homes. Modern Israel only exists because it stole the land of the people who lived there. The founding members of the Zionist movement were even explicit in calling it "colonial" in nature.
 
isr*el has existed for barely 80 years and you don't get to just establish a country on top of millions of dead Palestinians because "Jewish people deserve a majority country," take land from the fucking European colonizers instead and give it to them.


Blatant lie, it became a country because a bunch of zionist militias committed thousands of terrorist attacks against Palestinians of all religions and then the usa saw a chance to make a useful ally out of them to establish a stronghold in the region.

If you want accountability for the Holocaust then ask it of the blatantly antisemitic Europeans rather than justifying the mass murder of Palestinians. Your opinion is disgusting and is the actual antisemitic one; zionism was opposed by the vast majority of Jewish people in its early days and relies on antisemitism to function as an ideology.

Also, maybe don't throw around slurs for Romani people.

All you do in this thread is yap. I couldn’t care what someone with “from the river to the sea” in their profile thinks. You proudly chant your literal anti-semitic garbage. Yes, let’s kill every Jew in Israel from the river to the sea — amazing!!

My post has nothing to do with Palestine. My post has everything to do with that Jews deserve a state. I couldn’t care less where.

My family lived in the Levant before the 1900s, the currency literally says Israel but please go on. Please try and “educate me” about 80 years. Yes, I don’t know what I’m talking about when I’ve had family there for 150+ years.

Why is Israel mentioned over 40 times in the Quran but Palestine 0 times. Oh but Israel has only existed 80 years? Yes, yes.

If it’s Palestine’s land, who was President before 1948? Prime minister? Governor? Tell me please.

You are seriously gas lighting yourself so hard into believing your own side. Isn’t it amazing how the Druze who live in Israel have never started a fight or conflict with Israel? Hm, wonder why.

I’m sure you don’t know but many Jewish people would have been fine to go to Argentina or wherever it was said that they would have a state. If you want to be mad at someone, be mad at the British but don’t come for the Jews.

Again, my post has literally nothing to do with Palestinians. The jews deserve a state and the 1933 peel commission plan was for literally 25% of the land, where Jews already had settlements.
 
Like it or not, Israel is a settler-colony. A state created explicitly as a colony. Just because an Israel existed 4000 years ago doesn't (and never has) give Israeli settlers the right to evict Palestinians from their own homes. Modern Israel only exists because it stole the land of the people who lived there. The founding members of the Zionist movement were even explicit in calling it "colonial" in nature.

And who stole the land from the Jews who lived there originally? The Jews were kicked out of their homes from the Romans so they lose their ancestral claim to the land? They went back because Britain and the UN gave them the go ahead. Prior to and during WW2, the region was not accepting any refugees. It wasn’t till Britain gave the stamp of approval that the flock came in.

Look, I obviously empathize with the situation. JFK said it himself, that it would never be a successful transition and both the Britain and UN were handling it poorly.

For that reason, me and many people couldn’t care where the Jews ended up, so as long as there was a land somewhere where they felt safe.

So when I say Israel and when I say jews deserve a state, yes, I don’t agree with displacement, but the original plan was beyond fair — and to say that the Jews don’t deserve a state somewhere, where they have sovereignty is what pushes me over the edge.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top