Yeah, I know Surgo, that's why I didn't specifically call out avian flu like I did with west nile and SARS- Sars I picked on because it was friggin everywhere it seemed and was reasonably contageous, and west nile is prevalent where ever you have
Aedes aegypticus mosquitoes in conjunction with any member of the corvidae, which is virtually everywhere anyways (at least most major population centers).
I really more lumped it in to show how easily the media can hype shit that is, really, not as harmful as it is made out to be. I know what you're thinking as of that last sentence, cause I kind of did just call this latest flu harmless in a roundabout way, so here is a pre-emptive reply to it:
morm said:
I'll panic when it's time to panic and so should you
Edit: I just did some more poking around. The last two generations have been hit by hypervirulent influenza; infact, pretty much every generation gets hit. The Spanish flu alone killed more than ww1 did apparently; but the following generation was much more solid biologically to take on influenza. All we do now by vaccinating is lowering the virulence of the strain in question, really, and that means that we'll have to step that much faster next time. Realistically though, according to epidemiologists, we're 'due' for another hit by a flu; if this is it, then this is it. It happens on average once per generation and it's just something you gotta deal with when having such a gloabalized and hyperpopulated world. I honestly will sound like a jerk for saying this, but it really is 'just another hypervirulent flu'.
Also, Surgo, upon thinking about avian flu a bit more, it really only takes on mutation to change it from being basically non virulent between people to full blown outbreak. Hell, Spanish flu was an avian variety of flu and that thing was a shit kicker, so it's not a far off thing to really have it turn into a crisis. Still, it was overblown like the rest of them (obviously not counting spanish flu though).