real...oh so the joke is in an hour long game you only had 250 cs and not enough gold for a full build ok
i thought the joke was he was indistinguishable form other players at 1k elo
Who the fuck cares what i do? Fact is, don't go around saying "lol you didn't break 20 cs you nub" when you don't break 250 cs 47/50 games. Stop fucking making shit about me. It's flattering, but try having an actual opinion, it is quite rewardingmasterful at calling people out am I right?
What...You just did call pookar out. You went as far looking up his profile. I don't even know your ign, and I've never been bothered to search through the thread to find it.
Also, pookar, in your last 50 games you only got over 250 cs a whopping 3 times. Unless all 47 of those games are under an hour long then you should probably not try to call people out (especially people who are clearly trolling), for not having good cs. Just a tip
Who the fuck cares what i do? Fact is, don't go around saying "lol you didn't break 20 cs you nub" when you don't break 250 cs 47/50 games. Stop fucking making shit about me. It's flattering, but try having an actual opinion, it is quite rewarding
That really surprises me. I have had quite a few hour+ long matches, and at about a 1/5 or 6 ratio to the games I play. I don't know what that says about the differences in our games, but it surprises meI have had... 3 one hour+ matches since the start of September (mostly playing on weekends, that's why I used September as my starting point). They're not exactly common, dude.
That really surprises me. I have had quite a few hour+ long matches, and at about a 1/5 or 6 ratio to the games I play. I don't know what that says about the differences in our games, but it surprises me
Bad players make more mistakes, which keep the other team in the game longer.
Better players don't make those mistakes so games rarely last more than 40 minutes.
That's the exact opposite of how the game works. Every short game I ever played, idiots on one team fed and it ended quick. Whenever people were good, the game lasted a long time because kill counts were low and no team was far enough ahead to be able to allout force a teamfight. I'm not sure if that was a real statement you were making, or just an attempt to call me bad, but you're dead wrong either way. Honestly, that could not be more off from the truthBad players make more mistakes, which keep the other team in the game longer.
Better players don't make those mistakes so games rarely last more than 40 minutes.
That's the exact opposite of how the game works. Every short game I ever played, idiots on one team fed and it ended quick. Whenever people were good, the game lasted a long time because kill counts were low and no team was far enough ahead to be able to allout force a teamfight. I'm not sure if that was a real statement you were making, or just an attempt to call me bad, but you're dead wrong either way. Honestly, that could not be more off from the truth
It's actually extremely accurate. Generally games involving two good teams will end around 30-40 minutes, because they will actually know how and when to take advantage and push for the win. Meanwhile, in a team of bad players, the players will not work together and team fights will often end with only one or two players remaining, which makes it much more difficult to push or take advantage. This causes the game to drag on and any sort of small advantage a team may have gained earlier in the game is largely nullified as both teams farm up and get closer to a full build (which realistically should NEVER happen).