But without leftovers hazard damage will start stacking up on an already fairly squishy pokemon.
Fire Punch isn't exactly a common move. Also, Excadrill very often carries Air Balloon, so EQ isn't guaranteed to touch it at all.
If Excadrill is spinning on an Outrage it means that Dragonite is LOCKED quite obviously, so it can spin comfortably even if the Dragonite carries coverage against Excadrill.Its the second most common coverage move after EQ and killing that Air Ballon with Extreme Speed to nail it with EQ afterwards isnt exactly difficult.
Only players that are braindead will use Outrage against Excadrill and Excadrill obviously cant switch into an Outrage because it will most likely get 2hkoed from it. The only way to get a szenario where Excadrill gets in against an Outrage locked Dragonite without dying would be when some defensive pivot took the first hit or something died.
I agree that its stupid to compare Donphan and Excadrill but the most common argument here against Donphan is that Excadrill outclasses it so it cant be helped.
Honestly, Excadrill's resistances make it much better at spinning against some particularly significant physical threats than Donphan...
252+ Atk Dragonite Outrage vs. 4 HP / 0 Def Excadrill: 166-196 (45.8 - 54.1%)
252+ Atk Dragonite Outrage vs. 252 HP / 0 Def Donphan: 189-223 (49.2 - 58%)
And as for the "people are making it work in OU" argument: -Tsunami- once achieved suspect reqs with Mightyena and I got Drifblim to work in OU once. That doesn't make Mightyena or Drifblim OU worthy. The truth is that in the highest levels of play, Donphan is utterly useless. We want our tiers to be an accurate representation of the metagame at its most competitive, and the usage stats before this move simply did not represent the metagame properly (due in part to a huge number of players who play on a far less competitive level).
It already has, alongside Starmie.
Donphan has priority. That alone gives him something over all the other UU spinners, as well as the vast majority of UU.as well as forretress (a much better megahorn resist), tentacruel (actually does stuff) and cloyster (who can threaten a sweep with shell smash).
yeah tbh donphan is just bad atm even in UU (it was kind of average the last time it was in uu since roserade pretty much just shits all over it)
I have never ever seen Blastoise use Aqua Jet. As for Hitmontop... yeah, I forgot about that one. My bad.Well, that's not entirely true. The, arguably best spinner in UU, Mega Blastoise, has stronger priority. Hell, even normal Blastoise's aqua jet is more powerful than an ice shard from Donphan. Additionally, Hitmontop is another spinner with more powerful priority than Donphan's. Of course, this assumes a situation when neither has attack investment, which is typical for a defensive spinner.
I would suggest that you find a method to tier other than usage then, as this move has made it clear that you're not tiering on pure usage, but rather viability. A tier named "overused" would ideally be exactly what it says on the tin: Pokemon that see the highest amount of usage, and nothing more. However, the extreme amount of bias thrown at this thing shows that there's more than that.Honestly, Excadrill's resistances make it much better at spinning against some particularly significant physical threats than Donphan...
252+ Atk Dragonite Outrage vs. 4 HP / 0 Def Excadrill: 166-196 (45.8 - 54.1%)
252+ Atk Dragonite Outrage vs. 252 HP / 0 Def Donphan: 189-223 (49.2 - 58%)
And as for the "people are making it work in OU" argument: -Tsunami- once achieved suspect reqs with Mightyena and I got Drifblim to work in OU once. That doesn't make Mightyena or Drifblim OU worthy. The truth is that in the highest levels of play, Donphan is utterly useless. We want our tiers to be an accurate representation of the metagame at its most competitive, and the usage stats before this move simply did not represent the metagame properly (due in part to a huge number of players who play on a far less competitive level).
"What if" he sees a change in usage, and makes it back to OU amounts.What do you mean by "What if?" They already changed the metrics, and donphan is now UU.
I don't think you're allowed to say a pokemon has to be top 50 used in any tier. If no one uses it, no one uses it. If it turns out to be too good for a tier it gets put into a BL but unless someone trys it out for themselves in UU and gets results to make everyone want to use it it'll just be BL2.Is there a process in which they force, say donphan, to be uu for a month, just to monitor its effect on the meta? Then they can shift it back again to ou until the next usage statstics come out
I would suggest that you find a method to tier other than usage then, as this move has made it clear that you're not tiering on pure usage, but rather viability. A tier named "overused" would ideally be exactly what it says on the tin: Pokemon that see the highest amount of usage, and nothing more. However, the extreme amount of bias thrown at this thing shows that there's more than that.
Here is an honest question. What happens if under the new "usage" metrics, Donphan STILL makes the OU cutoff? Will you further adjust the metrics, or just accept that people are finding ways to use it and let it be? Come to think of it, this whole bit reminds me of the Street Fighter community. I think in the early stages of SFIV, Seth was regarded as a pretty low tier character, and there weren't to many messing with him. Suddenly, someone in a tournament uses Seth and gets a perfect against one of the highest ranked Ryu players (Ryu being consistently high tier) and everyone's re-evaluating their stance on him.
EDIT: While we're talking about Excadrill, his typing is honestly worse to me than being pure ground IMO. Yeah, stab Iron Head is awesome as is resisting dragon, but steel's weaknesses suck, and there's no getting around that. The very existence of Mega Mawile is ensuring that everyone and their grandma's Delcatty is packing Earthsomething and Fire Blast. It feels like you have really add extensive coverage against his weaknesses and you're probably better off using a defogger or something.
Then that means Donphan has, through some metagame shift or other outside cause, become better suited to the metagame and would then be OU worthy."What if" he sees a change in usage, and makes it back to OU amounts.
Donphan in ubers? I like the idea hahahaThen that means Donphan has, through some metagame shift or other outside cause, become better suited to the metagame and would then be OU worthy.
Either that or some top player pulls a Molk and plays a fuck ton of games with Donphan even though they know it's bad.
Knock Off is an extremely widespread move thanks to the Gen V tutors. There's really no telling who's packing it for that surprise factor. Using Chansey isn't a risk I'd be willing to take for that reason alone.Tbh Blissey in OU is worse than Donphan in OU, since she has literally zero niche over Chansey(why would you keep both in the face of common Knock Off users such as Conkeldurr, Bisharp or Crawdaunt?), unlike Donphan which has a small and not very valuable, but still unique, niche. Yet Blissey is still OU in the 1760 stats and those weren't tailored in order to drop Blissey.
Knock Off is an extremely widespread move thanks to the Gen V tutors. There's really no telling who's packing it for that surprise factor. Using Chansey isn't a risk I'd be willing to take for that reason alone.
I won't say that it's a fair trade when the special damage difference can be higher than the leftovers recovery(always is when use super effective special moves) and you are not able to take any physical blow.Blissey does have the niche of passive recovery, which for a wall I would say is more important than the niche Donphan fills.