• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

2012 USA Election Thread: Obama projected winner

Who are you going to vote for in the 2012 Election?

  • Barack Obama

    Votes: 221 54.8%
  • Ron Paul

    Votes: 44 10.9%
  • Mitt Romney

    Votes: 37 9.2%
  • Jill Stein

    Votes: 85 21.1%
  • Vermin Supreme

    Votes: 11 2.7%
  • Gary Johnson

    Votes: 5 1.2%

  • Total voters
    403
Status
Not open for further replies.
And that's reason enough not to vote? If you really want Romney to win, I don't see why you wouldn't bother to just register and vote for him.

Because my vote won't make anyone win as I'm not a member of the Electoral College

Also @ Political Compass - I always knew GS was an evil commie at heart
 
updated slightly upon request

pcgraph73120122100.png
 
I think the one time I took that compass thing I was like, nearly almost center on the dot.

Obviously I should be Supreme Ruler of United States.
 
I would take another Democrat over Obama, don't care for the current Republicans. Minor, anyways, so who cares what I think! Viva La Revolucion!
 
I'm mainly voting for Obama because I want to see what the Republicans will do if he wins. I am expecting either a civil war or a coordinated mass suicide attempt.
 
I guess the mormon man looks nice enough.

Thougfh Minor anyways and there is a lack of Communist, anarchist, and celebrities on the ballot.
 
I just can't like Mitt. Hiding tax returns seems to be a REALLY big red flag to me. Doesn't seem like he'll do well with foreign policy at all, either, which has been a strength of Obama's.

Looking forward to Deck Knight's perspective on this.
 
Oh looks like iDunno's post was deleted, I guess I'll delete my response.

I'm also sort of disappointed in this thread because I was looking forward to seeing some knowledgeable discussion about the candidates since this is around the time I start paying attention to it.
 
Because my vote won't make anyone win as I'm not a member of the Electoral College

Also @ Political Compass - I always knew GS was an evil commie at heart

If Romney gets the most votes in a state, he gets all those electoral college votes. So yes, every vote counts, especially for a close state like yours. If Romney loses in your state and you didn't vote, you can blame yourself for not voting. The electoral college decides presidential elections, not the popular vote. I really don't know how else to explain it....
 
the fact that there are only two options (Dem/Rep) in the poll displays everything that is wrong with US politics

Even though (iirc) our politics are very different, I agree entirely with this sentiment.

If we put them in faintly historical context, Obama is a centrist republican and Romney is not much different.
 
If Romney gets the most votes in a state, he gets all those electoral college votes. So yes, every vote counts, especially for a close state like yours. If Romney loses in your state and you didn't vote, you can blame yourself for not voting. The electoral college decides presidential elections, not the popular vote. I really don't know how else to explain it....
With the way the Electoral College is set up, candidate A could receive 33.3% of the popular vote and candidate B could receive 66.7% but candidate A would still win because of electoral votes. So I really don't know how to give a shit about voting as an average citizen
 
With the way the Electoral College is set up, candidate A could receive 33.3% of the popular vote and candidate B could receive 66.7% but candidate A would still win because of electoral votes. So I really don't know how to give a shit about voting as an average citizen

If everyone thought like you, nobody would vote.

Voter encouragement is less about encouraging the individual and more about encouraging the group so the voting system stays stimulated and the democracy is sustained.

If only a certain group is stimulated enough to vote, that group will hold all the power in government.
 
With the way the Electoral College is set up, candidate A could receive 33.3% of the popular vote and candidate B could receive 66.7% but candidate A would still win because of electoral votes. So I really don't know how to give a shit about voting as an average citizen

Thats right, each state has a different number of electoral votes. Its all a numbers game, so what? This is a very close election and for the last time every vote counts. Your state happens to be one of those in which either candiate has a good shot at winning. So go vote. If your candidate loses and you are unhappy about the country but refused to vote, look yourself in the mirror. Sorry for the attitude, but I'm telling it how it is.
 
HERMAN CAIN 2012

No other president would have the balls to order a hit on Nicholas Cage!

(America is fucked)
 
I just want to respond to this from before:

It's quite obvious you either don't live in Massachusetts or you're too young to remember it.

Romney eliminated a $3 billion deficit in his time here without raising taxes, oversaw the state scholarship that sent myself and many of my friends to college tuition-free, banned assault weapons, gave aid to police forces in high-crime areas, increased minimum wage, gave tax benefits to veterans, gave incentives to environmentally-friendly companies, AND oh yeah! he introduced the first universal health insurance in the country.

Romney was a fucking awesome governor and I will be voting for him

The problem is, when he was governor of Massachusetts, Romney didn't need to cater to the extreme right in order to garner votes and his basic ideologies were never put into question. The fact is, if Romney wins presidency, he will be too busy trying to win votes for reelection to actually do what you would expect him to do. He has already proven to have extremely malleable ideals, having flopped on pretty much every issue and having made a fool of himself internationally in an attempt to cater to the more emotional voters (i.e. the teabaggers). I would definitely vote for Mitt Romney based on his record as governor, but the fact is he's proven himself too easy to manipulate to be an effective president, in my opinion.
 
I just want to respond to this from before:


The problem is, when he was governor of Massachusetts, Romney didn't need to cater to the extreme right in order to garner votes and his basic ideologies were never put into question. The fact is, if Romney wins presidency, he will be too busy trying to win votes for reelection to actually do what you would expect him to do. He has already proven to have extremely malleable ideals, having flopped on pretty much every issue and having made a fool of himself internationally in an attempt to cater to the more emotional voters (i.e. the teabaggers). I would definitely vote for Mitt Romney based on his record as governor, but the fact is he's proven himself too easy to manipulate to be an effective president, in my opinion.

Just for a bit of emphasis...

[youtube]EQwrB1vu74c[/youtube]

Mitt Romney's biggest political rival is himself from 4 or so years ago. He clearly has an internal philosophy, but he throws it out the window whenever he thinks it doesn't poll especially well. Regardless of what you think of anyone else's policies, Romney is the kind of person who will say and do anything, especially things coming from the standard Republican playbook, which he has now adopted as his own. If you vote for Mitt Romney, you're not actually voting for Mitt Romney. You're voting for the mouthpiece of the right wing whose sole motivation is to get re-elected.

(full disclosure: the video here is ron paul related, but i do not endorse ron paul, who has a lot of incredibly good ideas but a bit too much of a severe case of the crazies and the unelectables for me to actually back him)

RE: Obama. His main issues at the moment are a viciously oppositional republican-controlled house, the wanton spending of political capital on a healthcare bill with great promise and poor execution (don't get me wrong, healthcare reform is super important, but he hadn't built up enough clout to get something that big through- that's much more of a second-term endeavor), and a need to get re-elected if only to prevent the country from being essentially destroyed. Something tells me that if the 2012 elections go well for Democrats, actual things will happen and we might actually have a shot at a real functional government. A president with good ideas, no need to hedge his bets for re-election purposes, and a potentially helpful congress? A man can dream.
 
Just for a bit of emphasis...

RE: Obama. His main issues at the moment are a viciously oppositional republican-controlled house,

Friend, he had a democratically controlled congress for two whole years and he wasted it shoving Obamacare down our throats while letting the economy suffer. Obama said if the stimulus gets passed, unemployment would be 5.6% by June 2012. All this while adding 5 trillion dollars of new debt.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top