Clefable is on the doesn't deserve an OU analysis list. Either go here and prove why it should deserve an analysis or forget about it.I'd like to reserve the beast of an analysis that Clefable is. Lately I've been playing around with it in this meta and it really does quite well! Of course I'll have help from everyone else too...
may i reserve dageki?
Just curious, did I get permission to do this?
From somebody without a QC badge no?Guess I should post to say that my Ninjask analysis has gotten its first QC check.
From somebody without a QC badge no?
I would take it too, but i got ninjad :(
rock paper scissors?
bmb, would it be possible to have the old names of the 5th generation Pokemon in parentheses next to the "English" names? That way people who haven't adjusted to them (like me) can still search them up with the Romanized names.
Since apparently the English names are confirmed, does this mean I have to go through my analyses and change the names to the English ones? I mean, it's obviously not a problem as I have find + replace, I'm just wondering. Plus, I'm a little reluctant to replace Mebukijika with Sawsbuck.
I don't think you absolutely need to do it right away. Obviously the romanised names will need to be replaced at some point, but I'm only using the new English names in the Index for organisational purposes.
To be honest, it's probably easier to keep the romanised names until the last minute, and then do a quick find+replace, since then everybody knows what you're talking about. It only takes a few seconds to change the names anyway, so until you see another announcement about it, you shouldn't worry. You can change the names if you want, but it's entirely up to you.
polelover44 said:sure go aheadzdrup15 said:I noticed you haven't edited your analysis for a while. Are you still working on it or can I take it over?