regarding the Plane CAP what if It had Poke ball logos on the wings?
I prefer the left one by far.http://i418.photobucket.com/albums/pp268/chomzloh/cap1comparison.jpg
Thanks for the suggestions on the colour scheme, guys! I'm currently kinda undecided on which one I prefer (though I'm leaning a little for the one on the right), so a quick poll, maybe?
I'll start working on a final submission pose in the meantime, I guess.
Heads up, but your final submission is breaking the rules. Note the following rules in the OP:MrSuitMan said:
No props, action effects, move effects, environment effects or additional objects can be rendered on or around the pokemon. If a prop is part of the pokemon's basic design (ie Farfetch'd Stick), then it is acceptable.
It must have a distinguishable outline on the entire subject in contrast to the background. No part of the design can be blurred into the background or blended into the background.
I think I got what you meant. The flames right? They need an outline? Fixed it up for ya.Alright, I'll remove the beam. But I'm not sure I'm understanding the second part. What do you mean distinguishable outline? Does mine not have that?
I've already realized that people would try to jump on the "omg dark/ghost type. But I'm fairly confident that the raging whirlwind around it's body and the general color scheme would set it off from those misconceptions.@ KoA
Dont you think its kinda looks like a Dark or Ghost type? I mean, I can see that it could have Prankster as an ability, but I cant see it having Intimidate (which is already decided)