Stamped Shame That's check on Vaporeon (Hydration Wall) 1/2
UU Cofagrigus 2/2
LC Shuppet 2/2
LC Happiny 2/2
RU Victreebel 1/2
UU Cofagrigus 2/2
LC Shuppet 2/2
LC Happiny 2/2
RU Victreebel 1/2
-
Welcome to Smogon! Take a moment to read the Introduction to Smogon for a run-down on everything Smogon, and make sure you take some time to read the global rules.
-
Congrats to the winners of the 2023 Smog Awards!
Grammer-Prose Team Queue
- Thread starter Jellicent
- Start date
Hi guys, Kingdra VGC 2012 would like a check, please and thank you!
Did GP Checks for:
RU Miltank 2/2
VGC 2012 Kingdra 2/2
Worked on top of:
SuperJOCKE RU Primeape 2/2
Stamped:
November Blue RU Tangrowth 2/2
Shame That RU Hitmonchan 1/2
RU Miltank 2/2
VGC 2012 Kingdra 2/2
Worked on top of:
SuperJOCKE RU Primeape 2/2
Stamped:
November Blue RU Tangrowth 2/2
Shame That RU Hitmonchan 1/2
LC Surskit is ready for GP checks.
^ stamped SuperJOCKE's check on LC Surskit 1/2
edit: RU Golbat is 2/2 and uploaded - amcheck by Shame That stamped by me, and amcheck by sandshrewz stamped by Moo
edit: RU Golbat is 2/2 and uploaded - amcheck by Shame That stamped by me, and amcheck by sandshrewz stamped by Moo
RU Hitmonchan is ready.
Gallade (VGC12) is ready for GP checks!
Public service announcement 4:
All analysis writers, please keep the GP status of your analyses up-to-date. If you have implemented a check, post an update in the thread stating so. If you have left parts out intentionally, post an update stating so. If you have only implemented half of the check, post an update stating so. Also change the thread title. It is extremely confusing for GP team members when an analysis has not been updated. I will often look at a thread to see if it needs a check, only to be confused when I see bits of a previous check implemented, and other bits left out with no word from the OP.
All analysis writers, please keep the GP status of your analyses up-to-date. If you have implemented a check, post an update in the thread stating so. If you have left parts out intentionally, post an update stating so. If you have only implemented half of the check, post an update stating so. Also change the thread title. It is extremely confusing for GP team members when an analysis has not been updated. I will often look at a thread to see if it needs a check, only to be confused when I see bits of a previous check implemented, and other bits left out with no word from the OP.
very well deserved 1/2 on vgc gallade
The queue is updated, and I've edited the following into the op, so please take your time to read it. Thanks.
Notes for GP members:
Please use placeholders for threads and respect them. Stop placeholdering incomplete threads, and don't post unless you are actively grammar checking them. saying "I'll check this when I get a chance, placeholder" is pretty dumb.
Please do not do GP checks on an analysis where the OP hasn't implemented the GP check above you, unless you're "working on top of it." Instead, either stamp the check above you or contact the OP to implement the check. Just ignoring checks above you is pretty dumb.
Notes for analysis writers:
All analysis writers, please keep the GP status of your analyses up-to-date. If you have implemented a check, post an update in the thread stating so. If you have left parts out intentionally, post an update stating so. If you have only implemented half of the check, post an update stating so. Also change the thread title. It is extremely confusing for GP team members when an analysis has not been updated. I will often look at a thread to see if it needs a check, only to be confused when I see bits of a previous check implemented, and other bits left out with no word from the OP.
Please don't change your analyses to the Copyediting tag with [GP 0/2] in the title until it is COMPLETELY WRITTEN AND READY FOR GP CHECKS. This is really annoying for GP members who think its ready to be checked. Just leave the tag as "Copyediting (QC 3/3)" or whatever. Thanks.
Notes for GP members:
Please use placeholders for threads and respect them. Stop placeholdering incomplete threads, and don't post unless you are actively grammar checking them. saying "I'll check this when I get a chance, placeholder" is pretty dumb.
Please do not do GP checks on an analysis where the OP hasn't implemented the GP check above you, unless you're "working on top of it." Instead, either stamp the check above you or contact the OP to implement the check. Just ignoring checks above you is pretty dumb.
Notes for analysis writers:
All analysis writers, please keep the GP status of your analyses up-to-date. If you have implemented a check, post an update in the thread stating so. If you have left parts out intentionally, post an update stating so. If you have only implemented half of the check, post an update stating so. Also change the thread title. It is extremely confusing for GP team members when an analysis has not been updated. I will often look at a thread to see if it needs a check, only to be confused when I see bits of a previous check implemented, and other bits left out with no word from the OP.
Please don't change your analyses to the Copyediting tag with [GP 0/2] in the title until it is COMPLETELY WRITTEN AND READY FOR GP CHECKS. This is really annoying for GP members who think its ready to be checked. Just leave the tag as "Copyediting (QC 3/3)" or whatever. Thanks.