(Little) Things that annoy you in Pokémon

Is there a reason given based on what we know? not really. Since we don't know anything.

but I can spitball a few:
1. They saw the reaction before and knew they weren't going to talk about it in more detail for minimum 6 more months anyway. So just say 2025 up front so the entire conversation for the entire year is not "those dumb asses are shoving these out the door again". Incidentally if they announce an ILCA game in August for release in November, this would be the same boat.
3. A variant on #1 where there is not bait & switch conspiracy

Are any of those reasons necessarily likely? Ehhh some are pretty conspiratorial. And we won't know until we see.....literally anything about the game, anyway. But they're possibilities nonetheless.
Things are that bad, huh? We're really just as, if not more willing to believe Game Freak and co. would knowingly engage in deceptive marketing before making any sort of remotely serious attempt to pull back from the brink?

Damn man, alright. Guess I'll just do myself a favor and write off Gen 10 as another rushed buggy failure in the making. As for Z-A I'll maintain some sort of confidence in that because of 1) the strong foundation Arceus set and 2) Iwao being a good director whose leadership can seemingly allow the people in his team to cope a great deal better with these impossible deadlines
 
Things are that bad, huh? We're really just as, if not more willing to believe Game Freak and co. would knowingly engage in deceptive marketing before making any sort of remotely serious attempt to pull back from the brink?

Damn man, alright. Guess I'll just do myself a favor and write off Gen 10 as another rushed buggy failure in the making. As for Z-A I'll maintain some sort of confidence in that because of 1) the strong foundation Arceus set and 2) Iwao being a good director whose leadership can seemingly allow the people in his team to cope a great deal better with these impossible deadlines
This entire thing started with you handwringing over August revealing anything about Pokemon so I don't think you needed any help with this leap, much less my pure hypotheticals that I would apply to other companies too, dramps
 
I will admit that, until started otherwise, I also still believe ZA will come rather early in the year and they just said 2025 so it *seems* like they have improved the schedule. Despite the negative reception of SV it also sold like cupcakes. Like seriously, it has been huge. I don't see them being in such a hurry to change the schedule so the very next game is delayed. I would also find it weird, as it has been said, to have it be the focus of two Directs unless it's getting DLC. Development on it probably started right after LA launched as it's the same team behind it, and sure if LA and SV are anything to go by it means three years is not enough for them to polish a game fully, but I'm not sure if they really were aware SV would be so criticized. Would I love to be wrong and see an awesome new entry? Of course. Do I expect it? Not really. It's too soon after SV and as much as we hate it, they keep making too much money even on the current schedule (of course, making less ambitious games would also help but that seems unlikely).

That being said, I also think they wouldn't pass on the 30th anniversary being gen 10, it's too "rounded" of a chance, and that one is the most likely to be delayed. I don't see a LA-SV situation again, even if it's just cause of said anniversary. And I feel like a remake between ZA and gen 10 would be too awkwardly placed: surely if they want a Kalos one it would come out before ZA and their marketing team would know better than announcing it later, and I don't see a random Unova one happening this gen either. So I'm not worried about any surprise announcement this month. I don't think the fandom will be too shaken either, as there are people that think that just by releasing in 2025 it will have more dev time, seemingly forgetting/not aware of LA being released in 2022. It's also entirely possible ZA is just coming out in 2025 because it would be the 10th anniversary of the never launched Kalos sequels.

To sum it up I do think they may improve the schedule, but not with ZA, it will be with the anniversary.
 
Last edited:
Honestly...at this rate I would expect Z-A to come out later in 2025, like at least mid 2025 like the May-July period, rather than early. Legends: Arceus was a peculiar case, but Japan's fiscal year ends in March and the more you look at the big picture, the more it becomes clear that Arceus was Game Freak's intended "Fiscal Year 2021" mainline release with SV being their 2022 mainline game. BDSP was inherently attached at the hip to Legends: Arceus to a point where when you look at them, the intent for BDSP to be a crutch to cover for Arceus in case the latter didn't take off well is clear as day. L:A was also very explicitly stated to be an early 2022 release in its reveal trailer, while LZA's reveal trailer just gave a broad 2025, that being an inherently wider projected timeframe than what L:A was given at the start. Also at this point in time, back in 2021 they revealed Legends: Arceus's release date back in May, alongside BDSP's, while in the same timeframe this year we've heard absolutely nothing about Legends: Z-A since its initial reveal, not even a more solid release date, which further reinforces now that we're gonna be waiting a good deal longer than usual for this game.

January of a year is also a pretty bad time to release a game in a vacuum, since that's the dead zone after Christmas when no one is really shopping because the holidays are done. Arceus was only truly able to get away with it because it was riding on BDSP which did come out in the preceding holiday season and L:A was riding on BDSP still being fresh in everyone's minds and always being marketed alongside it, so everyone was already looking forward to Arceus at that point and after playing BDSP wanted more and bought Arceus accordingly. Z-A doesn't have such a luxury since as far as we know, it's standing by itself and Game Freak is banking on it selling well on its own.

I also think at this point Z-A will still be the focus of Pokemon Day 2025 given that, and Gen 10 will come out in 2026. The anniversary line-up to release a new generation on the 30th anniversary as part of the big celebration, but there's also another reason that further reinforces that being the best move on their part: the timing of the release of the upcoming Switch successor, and at this point Gen 10 is most certainly going to be Pokemon's big debut on that. The original Nintendo Switch is in the twilight period of its life cycle with fewer large-scale releases now, since there are only a few upcoming games and most barring Prime 4 are small-scale projects, and Furukawa has already confirmed the Switch successor will be revealed very soon, which means Nintendo is getting ready to jump ship. Assuming it comes out within this fiscal year at least, that means Holiday 2026 would be the Switch successor's second fiscal year, which is the perfect timing for Game Freak to jump ship, and that's always been the timeframe they've aligned to jump ship: The DS came out in 2004, Diamond and Pearl released in 2006. Then the 3DS came out in 2011, and X and Y released in 2013. Then the Switch came out in early 2017, and if we wanna get technical Let's Go Pikachu and Eevee debuted in Holiday 2018, and Sword and Shield the year after in 2019. The timing aligns nicely, and overall this range of timeframe has always been ideal for Game Freak and for one reason: Pokemon is a system seller, but it also needs a reasonably large install base to make the most of a game's features since Pokemon thrives on interactivity between players. Waiting two years to jump ship has always been the ideal window for them to wait to build a solid install base, then release a game to get going. Which makes that more favorable for the base Gen 10 games, especially since by nature a new generation game is a much, much bigger deal than a third version/DLC, remake, or Legends game to the masses, so the timing of a new generation's game release is crucial in that regard.

So yeah, a lot of thoughts, but wanted to pitch in what I think.
 
Having to reply Diamond because of my Ribbon Master...It truly is slow. People were not exagerating, it's painfully slow. I may have to buy a Platinum copy to get the Scarfs anyways so I may play there instead... How could child me deal with this?
 
Having to reply Diamond because of my Ribbon Master...It truly is slow. People were not exagerating, it's painfully slow. I may have to buy a Platinum copy to get the Scarfs anyways so I may play there instead... How could child me deal with this?
Because it's only a little slower than the first three gens and child you had yet to experience gens 5 and on.
 
Like do I think that is going to happen? Not necessarily. Gen 10 being saved for the anniversary feels more likely, regardless of where Z-A lands
That being said, I also think they wouldn't pass on the 30th anniversary being gen 10, it's too "rounded" of a chance, and that one is the most likely to be delayed. I don't see a LA-SV situation again, even if it's just cause of said anniversary. And I feel like a remake between ZA and gen 10 would be too awkwardly placed
I also think at this point Z-A will still be the focus of Pokemon Day 2025 given that, and Gen 10 will come out in 2026. The anniversary line-up to release a new generation on the 30th anniversary as part of the big celebration, but there's also another reason that further reinforces that being the best move on their part: the timing of the release of the upcoming Switch successor, and at this point Gen 10 is most certainly going to be Pokemon's big debut on that. The original Nintendo Switch is in the twilight period of its life cycle with fewer large-scale releases now, since there are only a few upcoming games and most barring Prime 4 are small-scale projects, and Furukawa has already confirmed the Switch successor will be revealed very soon, which means Nintendo is getting ready to jump ship. Assuming it comes out within this fiscal year at least, that means Holiday 2026 would be the Switch successor's second fiscal year, which is the perfect timing for Game Freak to jump ship
So the reason Gamefreak is taking an extra year is not because they learned they learned their lesson from S&V's reviews but to align themselves with the anniversary?

Now that is something that'd annoy me
 
So the reason Gamefreak is taking an extra year is not because they learned they learned their lesson from S&V's reviews but to align themselves with the anniversary?

Now that is something that'd annoy me
I mean until we even see what happens it could be both and it just aligns better.

Like if nothing else assuming:
1. There is indeed no other outsourced game this year
2. Z-A is closer to the middle of the year then like February
3. Gen 10 is in fact in 2026 for the anniversary

Then:
1. the outsourced game idea either got shelved entirely or at least got itself more time to cook if it also lands next year
2. Z-A got a few extra months of polish/finish
3. Gen 10 got an extra year entirely

Which gives them plenty of time to adjust and stay consistent with this idea moving forward. SV was enough to have them make sevearl statements about the bugs and such, even if they're vague, something they didn't bother with before. If nothing else I can't imagine GameFreak themselves are exactly thrilled with their Regional/national championships constantly crashing. I doubt they then double back immediately once the anniversary is over (though at that point we're looking all the way to 2028 since 2027 will be the DLC year so who can truly say anything).




Personally I think the funny part would be if they already had a rough outline of the DLC planned and it will turn out that was the intended anniversary celebration that lands in 2027.
 
My bloomer take on the matter is "They were probably always intending to have 2026 Gen 10 and use it as a segue into longer generations but SV being how it was settled things for good and maybe expedited certain internal reshufflings needed to get the plan into action". How certain of that I am will vary based on how late into 2025 Z-A releases.

Anyways as for an annoyance: I'm happy to wait as long as it takes for Z-A to come out the best it can be, but being left coping and uncertain over one very specific element of XY you want to see come back for months on end is mildly agonizing. (For more information, you may take a look at this very cool and normal Bulbagarden profile post)
 
Last edited:
My bloomer take on the matter is "They were probably always intending to have 2026 Gen 10 and use it as a segue into longer generations but SV being how it was settled things for good and maybe expedited certain internal reshufflings needed to get the plan into action". How certain of that I am will vary based on how late into 2025 Z-A releases.

Anyways as for an annoyance: I'm happy to wait as long as it takes for Z-A to come out the best it can be, but being left coping and uncertain over one very specific element of XY you want to see come back for months on end is mildly agonizing. (For more information, you may take a look at this very cool and normal Bulbagarden profile post)
Can't see that without being logged in but considering your signature and other posts on the subject I just assume it's Emma.
 
After complaining (rightfully) of the fanservice in the TCG (includong which has yet to come with the random Team Rocket revival), people are now complaining Rayquaza is not headlining the Year of the Dragon set because they won't be able to make money out of it. No Pikachu, no Charizard and no Rayquaza means less insane profits.

I only came back as a collector after not owning cards since the BW1 era, but it's so annoying how much more expensive as a hobby it has gotten only because of speculators. And for once TPCi is not pushing it and the same people are crying over it. I am a big Rayquaza and Zard fan but come on, there is nothing wrong with more dragons taking the spotlight.

Because it's only a little slower than the first three gens and child you had yet to experience gens 5 and on.
I wouldn't call it "a little slower", it's a very big difference specially after playing Emerald and Sapphire for months due to the challenge. I loved Diamond and it's true children have a lot more pstience with their one per year game, but still...
 
After complaining (rightfully) of the fanservice in the TCG (includong which has yet to come with the random Team Rocket revival), people are now complaining Rayquaza is not headlining the Year of the Dragon set because they won't be able to make money out of it. No Pikachu, no Charizard and no Rayquaza means less insane profits.

I only came back as a collector after not owning cards since the BW1 era, but it's so annoying how much more expensive as a hobby it has gotten only because of speculators. And for once TPCi is not pushing it and the same people are crying over it. I am a big Rayquaza and Zard fan but come on, there is nothing wrong with more dragons taking the spotlight.
I get so many little recommendations of these (often tiny) channels with very few views about Investing in the pokemon tcg and the week to week shake ups and how xyz thing is causing prices to crash in some ways but you should invest in these other things instead and it seems like SUCH a miserable little thing that's exploded since 2020. Like obviously these speculator markets have always been there but there's absolutely been a shift. People getting all their random clutter PSA graded as if 90% of it will actually sell at those prices.

And I've seen most of the prices for Pokemon Cards, a vast majority of them are not significant sell pieces especially compared to other TCGs unless it is absolute top of the top. This I push as a positive, broadly speaking, but again you get the gist.

I think I even saw one that was kind of decrying the fact that Japan was reprinting all the SV era sets - a thing to ostensibly help people who are not insane- as a bad thing for the market. It's like yeah I mean I guess literally speaking but also maybe hooking your wagon to a TCG Speculation Market was a bad idea.
 
people are now complaining Rayquaza is not headlining the Year of the Dragon set because they won't be able to make money out of it.
I mean them complaining cause they won't make money is dumb, but Rayquaza is the only Asian style dragon Pokémon, it is a little weird to not have it center stage for this.

The next closest is what? Drampa? Eternatus?
 
I mean them complaining cause they won't make money is dumb, but Rayquaza is the only Asian style dragon Pokémon, it is a little weird to not have it center stage for this.

The next closest is what? Drampa? Eternatus?
Dragonair??? I guess???

It's weird how few straightforwardly Asian-style dragon Pokemon there are. The only Pokemon I can think of that really fit the bill are Gyarados and Mega Rayquaza, and one of them isn't even a Dragon-type.
 
Last edited:
The set is called Paradise Dragona and the key art & central ex is Alolan Exeggutor surrounded by Latias & Latios while on the beach.

It's probably obliquely because of year of the dragon but it seems they wanted a literal "dragon's paradise" as in on like a beach more than anything. There will probably be a Rayquaza ex card anyway just because it's a significant dragon Pokemon that hasn't had a card since Rayquaza V/V Max and even if not meta shifting it'll probably also at least get a secret art rare
 
Made a long post on SM in Unpopular Opinions, but there's a small tangent that it made me think of to drop here.

Why do the Alola stories bend themselves into Pretzels to give Nebby to the player, when they already wrote an event in to obtain a Cosmog for Dex data purposes, given how uncharacteristically detached it comes across for Lillie?

Besides that, it'd certainly be more interesting if Lillie was allowed to keep the companion that helped her stand up to her insane mother, and in USUM's case it would have been a nice payoff contribution to things like the Faba Multi-Battle for Rainbow Rocket, and potentially factored into other cutscenes in general (since the old games never acknowledge Legendaries after their capture since they can't ensure you kept them).
 
Made a long post on SM in Unpopular Opinions, but there's a small tangent that it made me think of to drop here.

Why do the Alola stories bend themselves into Pretzels to give Nebby to the player, when they already wrote an event in to obtain a Cosmog for Dex data purposes, given how uncharacteristically detached it comes across for Lillie?

Besides that, it'd certainly be more interesting if Lillie was allowed to keep the companion that helped her stand up to her insane mother, and in USUM's case it would have been a nice payoff contribution to things like the Faba Multi-Battle for Rainbow Rocket, and potentially factored into other cutscenes in general (since the old games never acknowledge Legendaries after their capture since they can't ensure you kept them).
Nebby does not belong to either you or Lillie as individuals, he belongs to both. When Lillie hands him off to you it's because she needs to go on her own to build her own strength and fulfill the potential of she and her other Pokemon. I imagine that Nebby would hop between the two trainers many times in the years after SM/USUM for this reason and eventually when Selene and Lillie get married he would become their jumbo-sized house cat/bat
 
Last edited:
I'd say at least the reasoning for her giving you Nebby in the Ultra games made sense. She figured Nebby would help alleviate Necrozma's tremendous pain and since you were the one to handle Necrozma, you were more fit to have Nebby on your side in case you were to encounter Necrozma again. I don't suppose Lillie knew about the second Cosmog you can get in the game in its postgame prior.

The way it was written in SM was straight up dumb though as well as her being shipped to the Kanto region before she could fully develop into a trainer and show you what she's been able to accomplish. Lillie's character in postgame USUM should've been how she was handled in lategame/postgame SM, and this should have been the moment for her to begin being a trainer. Sure, arguments could be made that she's too new to utilize a legendary Pokemon, but she's competent enough to cautiously use it and Nebby is familiar enough with Lillie to trust her.

Also this is in the same game where preschoolers carry Landorus and Mega Latios in the Battle Tree. She'd be fine with Solgaleo/Lunala.
 
I feel like I write way too much on this part of the forum while only lurking on the rest...but uh, I suppose it's nice to just write my dumb thoughts down. Iron Crown and Iron Boulder have swapped places in the BB dex for no reason. It misses the (already kind of broken because of WW and IL) pattern the Past Paradoxes and their own National numbers have, of being the inverse of the original trío. That is a little thing but annoys me because it's quite random.

The set is called Paradise Dragona and the key art & central ex is Alolan Exeggutor surrounded by Latias & Latios while on the beach.

It's probably obliquely because of year of the dragon but it seems they wanted a literal "dragon's paradise" as in on like a beach more than anything. There will probably be a Rayquaza ex card anyway just because it's a significant dragon Pokemon that hasn't had a card since Rayquaza V/V Max and even if not meta shifting it'll probably also at least get a secret art rare
The Stellar Tera cards also have attack names based on gemstones, so I would be surprised if there isn't a Rayquaza with an Emerald attack. That's bound to happen sooner or later. But meanwhile, we get some fresh aire with a variety of dragons of different types. Not my set sure , as I plan to collect only the new Gen IX mons/forms, but if I had the money to collect more sets I would find this one very cool.

I mean them complaining cause they won't make money is dumb, but Rayquaza is the only Asian style dragon Pokémon, it is a little weird to not have it center stage for this.



The next closest is what? Drampa? Eternatus?

Drampa was saved in Go until this year, so I guess that's what is considered the most asian one in looks, but they probably don't want to pick a Pokemon not in SV and give it so much focus. Like, if my favourite mon was Drampa I would be kind of annoyed there is a Stellar Tera Drampa card but I can't do that in the games.
 
Drampa was saved in Go until this year, so I guess that's what is considered the most asian one in looks, but they probably don't want to pick a Pokemon not in SV and give it so much focus. Like, if my favourite mon was Drampa I would be kind of annoyed there is a Stellar Tera Drampa card but I can't do that in the games.
Didn't realize until now that yeah they have made sure to only make Tera ex cards of Pokemon you can actually terastalize. I mean that makes sense once pointed out, but despite keeping up with the TCG I just assumed one or two were from another game.
 
Didn't realize until now that yeah they have made sure to only make Tera ex cards of Pokemon you can actually terastalize. I mean that makes sense once pointed out, but despite keeping up with the TCG I just assumed one or two were from another game.
Meanwhile in Masters you have Greta with Dynamax Breloom, a Pokemon that was never in SWSH. Suffice to say this is not a consistent doctrine across the various parts of the franchise lol
 
Back
Top