No Scald Ladder

Status
Not open for further replies.
(Sorry for double post but I think this warrants its own)

I know that this isn't a suspect test or anything more than an experiment, though it seems that quite a few people are in favour of pushing further for a ban.

Before any action is taken on potentially suspecting/banning scald, I suggest that we firstly test its arguably most broken user: Suicune. On all other mons Scald pretty much only helps in disruption and an extra side effect, that can often be removed by Heal Bell/Aromatherapy and I hardly ever find more game-breaking then any other move. Suicune however is the only mon I could see as pushing this to make it potentially broken, as with it its sweeping abilities are greatly increased in giving itself the support it needs to setup and seems to be the most centralising user of the move, as really no other Scald users are specifically prepared for. I'd much rather see Suicune get suspected before action is taken on Scald which just cripples a whole lot of bulky waters and has a significant impact on lower tiers as well, and I know quite a few people seem to be against Suicune anyway.
I'd 100% support a Suicune suspect. It, along with Lucario, is one of the best sweepers in the tier. It's more mindless clicking than other broken stuff we've had in the past.
 
Banning scald will nerf any bulky water pokemon. These pokemon depend of scald in the way to status the opponent because there are a lot of toxic immunities, but burn immunities there are a few. With bulky waters nerfed, High offensive teams will be much more viable, because physical sweepers (Salamance, Haxorus, Sharpedo, Feraligatr, Mienshao, etc) will not have to worry about burns and easily set-up against a lot of walls that could stop these sweepers with scald.

In my opinion scald is not a broken move, its 30% chance of burn makes it an unsafe move, it will not always work and every team has an answer to it, like Water absorb or dry skin, heal bell / aromatherapy, rest, natural cure or simply a special pokemon. There are also other moves that have the same chance, like Hurricane confusion that sometimes is more annoying than scald burn.
 
if you guys are considering taking scald away, why not do the same for will-o-wisp? Rotom-Heat and arcanine are very common and they usually carry that move, and it's as annoying (if not more) as scald
well hold on there. WoW and Scald are different, despite having the same effect. WoW doesn't do damage and can be absorbed by Fire types (you don't want to click WoW when fire type users like Infernape, Darmanitan, Entei, Arcanine, Rotom-H and Chandelure are still around giving them a free switch in). Scald lets bulky waters spam a decent power BP move while inflicting burn. Doing damage at the same time while causing status frees up a moveslot that can be used for hazards, boosting move, Rest, etc... Comparing WoW to Scald is essentially comparing T Wave to Thunder...
 
if you guys are considering taking scald away, why not do the same for will-o-wisp? Rotom-Heat and arcanine are very common and they usually carry that move, and it's as annoying (if not more) as scald
This is For several reasons.
1. Scald is 100%, willo is only 85% accurate
2. Scald hits fire types, the only type immune to burn super effectively
3. Scald is literally the only reason grass and Dragon types can't check bulky waters, because of the the potential and very crippling burn chance. Will o wisp and scalding are so different, and scald is a lot more broken and centralizing than will o ever could

Edit: ninjaed
 
as a user of stall i'm a little biased in favor of scald. the arguments that say that scald takes the skill out of the metagame kinda collapses on themselves as there is minimal skill freely switching in a physical sweeper and setting up. in terms of suicune, i personally use a perish/trap politoed with water absorb as it completely beats suicune without any drawbacks. the presence of scald can also help diversify team building as pokemon like roselia can function in a niche role as a hazard setter. Despite this i'm still a little curious as to what the meta will look like with out it.
 
Very interesting concept, no scald ladder gives physical attacker more chances to set up. I played it a little and it isn't that bad. As far as viability of stall goes, I think you still can play it very effectively. The fact that you can't rely on 30% lucky burns just means you have to play stall a little differently. I love the fact that bulky water types can't beat threats like haxorus, feraligatr, abomasnow because they aren't supposed to. You can't really tell me that the only thing that keeps those mons from being broken is 30% burn chance move. That's just ridiculous. Scald is a very good move with no real drawbacks on defensive mons, it can decide a battle for you and makes some games end because of coin flip. There aren't many thing that can reliably switch in on it and don't pull out special attackers because they aren't a switch in on it they don't appreciate the passive damage + if you are facing a stall team that damage is what most likely will kill you at the end. With that in mind 100% switch ins on every scald are narrowed down to toxicroak, roserade, shaymin, blissey, jellicent, reuniclus, trevenant + maybe some aromatherapy/heal bell users. I didn't list herracross, machamp, alakazam because they can switch in only few times before being really worn down by it. For me that's too few answers to the move so much used in the tier, but I have to really play no scald tier to see how is uu without it. To the idea of suspecting suicune I am 100% for it. I really don't know how this mon didn't go up by usage because I see it on like 90% of the teams but maybe it's just my luck.
 
suicune is slow and offensively mediocre, why would it be suspected? and, again, look at your arguments, people. there are guys here saying that bulky water types now are "unviable" because they can't "counter" physical threats. in what world relying on a 30% chance to beat a mon means "countering" it? by that logic sheer cold walrein counters every mon ever.

the UU no scald ladder is hyper offensive atm because people are hyping physical sweepers, not because defensive teams are unviable. IF defensive teams were unviable, it would be because of the sheer number of powerful threats that could even warrant suspect testing, not because a fucking crocune can no longer counter a fucking salamence. and even then, as i've said, stall is still perfectly viable. honestly if your defensive team relies on scald burns to counter threats, it's a crappy team.
 
1) I never said that it was countering it. The main thing is that it discourages direct switchins to it so that I can punish the physical attackers coming in against it. You shouldn't be relying on burning it by staying in to constantly Scald until you manage to grab a burn while it sets up unless there are literally no other options. It doesn't help it to counter it, but helps punish switchins well. This is the big blow to defensive teams, when you can switchin to wall something but water-types tend to be a thorn in momentum, as they just find that they aren't threatening enough. Granted it is relying on chance a bit, but so is Dynamic Punch Machamp, Discharge users and many other factors of Pokemon. Pokemon is a game of chance.

2) I like how some of you are talking about how you shouldn't be relying on what you call a shitty 30% burn chance, but at the same time claim it to be broken? (O_o)

3) "suicune is slow and offensively mediocre, why would it be suspected?" Well firstly I wouldn't necessarily call 85 speed slow as it sort of makes it one of the faster defensive mons in the tier. And although yeah its initial offences aren't that great, I'm pretty sure everyone knows how it can snowball into an unkillable monster if there is no counter.

And lastly I'd just like to add I think I saw some arguments relating Scald to be as unhealthy as things such as Swagger which as we know was banned. But the difference in parafusion and flinch confusion strategies was the odds were actually in the favour of the Swagger user rather than the Scald user, which was why it was ultimately considered to be rather unhealthy.
 
The radiant hero said:
suicune is slow and offensively mediocre, why would it be suspected?
Ummm... Suicune is arguably the best pokemon in the entire tier as it is unstoppable after a even 1 calm mind boost. Most physical attackers struggle to even 2hko and none can 0hko it. It is weak before a calm mind on the specially defensive side of things but that is remedied in one turn. I would definitely be up for a suicune suspect under the reasoning that it restricts teambuilding.



However scald is not a big deal in my opinion. From what I've seen scald is just a deterrent to physical mons setting up. Anyone who banks on getting the scald burn to win matches is just asking to get exposed. A good player will find a way to deal with scald just as a good player finds a way to deal with any threat. Threats are meant to be countered not banned. We don't counter dynamicpunch, we find a way to beat it instead. We don't ban Sacred Fire, we play through it. I understand the point that scald's wide distribution is what makes it so dangerous, more so then a dynamic punch or sacred fire. But at the end of the day it's only 30% and a good player should have a way to beat bulky waters regardless.
Scald is just another part of the game, you either deal with it and its low 30% odds with a plethora of options including heal bell, dry skin, and water absorb, or you don't deal with it and get annoyed.
 
If something like Grass-types couldn't be burned by Scald or if it was not SE versus Fire-types (like the opposite from Freeze Dry), there would be much less complaints about the move.
 
By the logic of it wins games by chance, shouldn't critical hits be banned (or placed in a separate tier) too? Surely everybody has lost countless games, and won countless games due to a critical hit (without scope lens or raised chance critical hit moves or anything else that raises critical chance). It's even raisable, same as evasion for example. Chance is kind of a part of the game, I get evading should be banned because everyone would have to carry odor sleuth or the likes, but a 30% chance to burn move? Meh. The whole thing bothers me a bit, but the whole, "Only things that can't get burnt take super effective damage," I see it. I just don't feel like chance moves should be banned (or make a new tier without them) unless you do them all. My opinion though, save your hate.
 
If the UU tier bans scald, I promise you more and more people will be turned off by showdown. I can take suspect testing a pokemon because it is over centralizing the tier but now we are going so far as to ban a move. Too many rules just limits the enjoyment of a game regardless of how you spin it.

Pokemon is an incredibly luck based game that in tails crits, chances of getting a status, chances of getting out of a status and speed ties. Yet now UU says "Ehh the other stuff isn't that bad but what is bad is getting burned by an 80 based power water move that has a 30% to burn." Cater to the top players and make the game more easier for them to maintain their rank.

Since this will probably require reqs, do you really think the naysayers will have a chance to get a fair share in this vote? The answer is no. Dominate players dictate the direction of the entire tier and the people in charge run with it.

The UU tier is barely getting any activity these days, with the viability thread buried somewhere in the first page and it not being updated in god knows how long. Discussions are dead and overall excitement for the tier isn't where it used to be. I wonder how we can maintain the current level of excitement for the tier? Oh I know how about we discuss banning scald and making people further run off to OU or RU. Brilliant as always smogon.

 
Last edited:
If the UU tier bans scald, I promise you more and more people will be turned off by showdown. I can take suspect testing a pokemon because it is over centralizing the tier but now we are going so far as to ban a move. Too many rules just limits the enjoyment of a game regardless of how you spin it.

Pokemon is an incredibly luck based game that in tails crits, chances of getting a status, chances of getting out of a status and speed ties. Yet now UU says "Ehh the other stuff isn't that bad but what is bad is getting burned by an 80 based power water move that has a 30% to burn." Cater to the top players and make the game more easier for them to maintain their rank.

Since this will probably require reqs, do you really think the naysayers will have a chance to get a fair share in this vote? The answer is no. Dominate players dictate the direction of the entire tier and the people in charge run with it.
Umm... I agree with the first part of your post that people will get turned off by banning everything. However, your "top players dominate part" is completely off base. Most everything here is run in a democratic manner. Tiers are based on usage rates and are therefore democratic and voting is democracy. Presuming you've shown competency and that you know what you're talking about is the reason for getting reqs. We don't want idiots making decisions. That being said, those who have proven themselves only get one vote no matter who you are.The tier leaders and the randoms all have an equal say. If you are a naysayer there should be proof that you know what you're talking about and that is what reqs are for. If you are inclined to get reqs you can get them. It is nothing about top players using voting to dominate the direction of the tier. Yes they provide ideas and arguments, but we are the ones who make the decisions in vote scenarios.
 
If the UU tier bans scald, I promise you more and more people will be turned off by showdown. I can take suspect testing a pokemon because it is over centralizing the tier but now we are going so far as to ban a move. Too many rules just limits the enjoyment of a game regardless of how you spin it.

Pokemon is an incredibly luck based game that in tails crits, chances of getting a status, chances of getting out of a status and speed ties. Yet now UU says "Ehh the other stuff isn't that bad but what is bad is getting burned by an 80 based power water move that has a 30% to burn." Cater to the top players and make the game more easier for them to maintain their rank.

Since this will probably require reqs, do you really think the naysayers will have a chance to get a fair share in this vote? The answer is no. Dominate players dictate the direction of the entire tier and the people in charge run with it.

The UU tier is barely getting any activity these days, with the viability thread buried somewhere in the first page and it not being updated in god knows how long. Discussions are dead and overall excitement for the tier isn't where it used to be. I wonder how we can maintain the current level of excitement for the tier? Oh I know how about we discuss banning scald and making people further run off to OU or RU. Brilliant as always smogon.
I actuallly logged in to voice my agreement with this guy. I don't like it, but the only tier I've not played a single game in since like B1W1 is UU. I wanted to get into it at the start of XY, but suddenly everything got banned and I stuck to OU until RU got released and that's where I've sticked for the most part. I currently play all tiers but UU (I rarely play Ubers though) and I'm not sure why but there's something about this tier that just... I don't know, I guess "dislike" is the correct word. I can't even talk about how the metagame is and how it's balanced, as all I know of the tier is what I occasionally read on the forums.

But of course, this is just me out of many and you can ignore it for all I care.

Umm... I agree with the first part of your post that people will get turned off by banning everything. However, your "top players dominate part" is completely off base. Most everything here is run in a democratic manner. Tiers are based on usage rates and are therefore democratic and voting is democracy. Presuming you've shown competency and that you know what you're talking about is the reason for getting reqs. We don't want idiots making decisions. That being said, those who have proven themselves only get one vote no matter who you are.The tier leaders and the randoms all have an equal say. If you are a naysayer there should be proof that you know what you're talking about and that is what reqs are for. If you are inclined to get reqs you can get them. It is nothing about top players using voting to dominate the direction of the tier. Yes they provide ideas and arguments, but we are the ones who make the decisions in vote scenarios.
Eh, it kinda depends. Due to how the suspect testing is done, the mid-ladder players are often disuaded from getting reqs when they see they need ~150 games contra the top player's ~30. It is far more forgiving for the best and tough for the rest. That being said, I assume a lot of top players are against this shit too (or so I hope) for I don't want to ladder a tier I for some reason hate to stop a possible ban on Scald for my lower tier fun. So, yeah.

And then there's the people like myself that read up on the meta, study it, explore it... but fucking sucks nonetheless lol. We might know the meta more than we know our mothers, but for some reason we just can't get things right in the game. For instance, most of the time I'm on showdown I watch random top players play and occasionally play myself because meh I suck why bother.
 
If the UU tier bans scald, I promise you more and more people will be turned off by showdown. I can take suspect testing a pokemon because it is over centralizing the tier but now we are going so far as to ban a move. Too many rules just limits the enjoyment of a game regardless of how you spin it.

Pokemon is an incredibly luck based game that in tails crits, chances of getting a status, chances of getting out of a status and speed ties. Yet now UU says "Ehh the other stuff isn't that bad but what is bad is getting burned by an 80 based power water move that has a 30% to burn." Cater to the top players and make the game more easier for them to maintain their rank.

Since this will probably require reqs, do you really think the naysayers will have a chance to get a fair share in this vote? The answer is no. Dominate players dictate the direction of the entire tier and the people in charge run with it.

The UU tier is barely getting any activity these days, with the viability thread buried somewhere in the first page and it not being updated in god knows how long. Discussions are dead and overall excitement for the tier isn't where it used to be. I wonder how we can maintain the current level of excitement for the tier? Oh I know how about we discuss banning scald and making people further run off to OU or RU. Brilliant as always smogon.
Cool your jets and lay off the sodium. First of all this isn't a suspect test but an experiment to prove whether or not it's even worth talking about similar to a ladder without Stealth Rock. Also, the "your kingdom will burn under the hubris of your rule" tone would be irritating if wasn't so common in suspect threads, metagame threads, youtube comments sections, gamefaqs threads, /vp/ threads, and probably sticky notes on your fridge. If you want to see things go your way in UU, play it, understand it, and convince people of your opinions when suspects do happen. It isn't some evil Smogon conspiracy that the people who PLAY THE FUCKING TIER talk about and influence the metagame.

I'm probably overreacting but these types of posts are mind boggling. Read the OP before commenting.
 
Last edited:

Hogg

grubbing in the ashes
is a Tournament Director Alumnusis a Site Content Manager Alumnusis a Social Media Contributor Alumnusis a Community Contributor Alumnusis a Top Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Simulator Staff Alumnusis an Administrator Alumnus
So an interesting thing I'm noticing on this ladder is that without Scald, Haxorus is rising to become almost as useful as Salamence. Without needing Lum anymore it can now use Life Orb, which means it does considerably more damage from the get-go, and with bulky Waters often packing Ice Beam to deal with Dragon switch-ins since they can no longer rely on the burn threat to keep them at bay, the fact that it can survive an IB is pretty significant. It also gets Taunt, which Mence would kill to have.

Not saying it outclasses Mence, because Mence is still one of the most versatile and powerful mons in the tier. Just saying that whereas previously I rarely found a good reason to use Hax over Mence, now it's actually pretty decent.
 
Eh, it kinda depends. Due to how the suspect testing is done, the mid-ladder players are often disuaded from getting reqs when they see they need ~150 games contra the top player's ~30.
I want to highlight this because of how incredibly wrong it is. On the Suspect ladder, everyone starts out fresh. Everyone begins with 1000 Elo and no COIL. So the only reason anyone would need 150+ games is because they struggle to ladder in the first place, such as myself. Our former tier leader Kokoloko (who easily knows as much if not more about UU than the rest of us combined) took nearly 80 games to get reqs for the Serperior test. EVERY PLAYER HAS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A MARK. If we instigated ranking in the middle of the ladder, yeah, players at the top would barely have to do any more laddering, but even we'd be better off, because they clearly understand the ladder better than someone who struggles to break 1200. In short, I would prefer a small pool of dedicated knowledgeable votes rather than a large pool diluted by players who didn't know the tier as well.
 
I want to highlight this because of how incredibly wrong it is. On the Suspect ladder, everyone starts out fresh. Everyone begins with 1000 Elo and no COIL. So the only reason anyone would need 150+ games is because they struggle to ladder in the first place, such as myself. Our former tier leader Kokoloko (who easily knows as much if not more about UU than the rest of us combined) took nearly 80 games to get reqs for the Serperior test. EVERY PLAYER HAS AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE A MARK. If we instigated ranking in the middle of the ladder, yeah, players at the top would barely have to do any more laddering, but even we'd be better off, because they clearly understand the ladder better than someone who struggles to break 1200. In short, I would prefer a small pool of dedicated knowledgeable votes rather than a large pool diluted by players who didn't know the tier as well.
It was an extreme example, but seeing that 150 games is about 65GXE (Ie more wins than losses by a decent margin), I found it a fair number to base yourself on.
And perhaps not everyone is as lazy as me when it comes to laddering, but the thought of having to around 100-150 games just makes me go bleh.

And I made this mention initally based on the fact that if Scald is suspected, then that will affect the tier I enjoy the most too. Meaning if I care enough, I'll need to learn a new meta simply to avoid my meta going down the drain (it might and it might not, who knows)..
 
1) I never said that it was countering it. The main thing is that it discourages direct switchins to it so that I can punish the physical attackers coming in against it. You shouldn't be relying on burning it by staying in to constantly Scald until you manage to grab a burn while it sets up unless there are literally no other options. It doesn't help it to counter it, but helps punish switchins well. This is the big blow to defensive teams, when you can switchin to wall something but water-types tend to be a thorn in momentum, as they just find that they aren't threatening enough. Granted it is relying on chance a bit, but so is Dynamic Punch Machamp, Discharge users and many other factors of Pokemon. Pokemon is a game of chance.

2) I like how some of you are talking about how you shouldn't be relying on what you call a shitty 30% burn chance, but at the same time claim it to be broken? (O_o)

3) "suicune is slow and offensively mediocre, why would it be suspected?" Well firstly I wouldn't necessarily call 85 speed slow as it sort of makes it one of the faster defensive mons in the tier. And although yeah its initial offences aren't that great, I'm pretty sure everyone knows how it can snowball into an unkillable monster if there is no counter.

And lastly I'd just like to add I think I saw some arguments relating Scald to be as unhealthy as things such as Swagger which as we know was banned. But the difference in parafusion and flinch confusion strategies was the odds were actually in the favour of the Swagger user rather than the Scald user, which was why it was ultimately considered to be rather unhealthy.
1) it discourages direct switch-ins, but so does hazards, roar, toxic, etc, which are stall tools that are actually more effective than scald 70% of the time. if you need chip damage, surf is also there and does more damage than scald (again, 70% of the time). scald-less water types are a thorn in momentum? don't use them, simple as that. as for the dynamicpunch/discharge comparison, lets take a look at the viability rankings: there is 1 viable mon that commonly runs dpunch (machamp), located at B+; there are NONE viable mons that commonly run discharge; as for scald, there is 1 S rank mon (cune), 3 A rank mons (tentacruel, pert, mega toise), 3 A- rank mons (empoleon, slowking, vaporeon). im not even gonna look at lower ranks.

2) i don't claim it's broken, i claim it's uncompetitive. and if you think a 30% chance is too low to be relevant, do you agree OHKO moves should be allowed again?

3) well i expressed myself incorrectly there. suspects are deemed so by 3 possible characteristics: they're too good offensively, defensively or supportively for the tier. crocune, the toughest defensive set, has no reliable recovery and (without scald) is extremely susceptible to physically offensive threats; 90 special attack and 85 speed is amazingly supbar in a tier which has mons reaching 165 special attack, and 99% of the offensive threats have 90+ speed; the only good supportive moves it gets are roar, haze and tailwind, none are common enough or broken enough. thus, suicune isn't broken in any of the 3 possible characteristics.

oh and also
If the UU tier bans scald, I promise you more and more people will be turned off by showdown. I can take suspect testing a pokemon because it is over centralizing the tier but now we are going so far as to ban a move. Too many rules just limits the enjoyment of a game regardless of how you spin it.

Pokemon is an incredibly luck based game that in tails crits, chances of getting a status, chances of getting out of a status and speed ties. Yet now UU says "Ehh the other stuff isn't that bad but what is bad is getting burned by an 80 based power water move that has a 30% to burn." Cater to the top players and make the game more easier for them to maintain their rank.

Since this will probably require reqs, do you really think the naysayers will have a chance to get a fair share in this vote? The answer is no. Dominate players dictate the direction of the entire tier and the people in charge run with it.

The UU tier is barely getting any activity these days, with the viability thread buried somewhere in the first page and it not being updated in god knows how long. Discussions are dead and overall excitement for the tier isn't where it used to be. I wonder how we can maintain the current level of excitement for the tier? Oh I know how about we discuss banning scald and making people further run off to OU or RU. Brilliant as always smogon.
LOL^
 
the only difference is that i can chose not to use focus blast, but not being scalded is up to my opponent. also, by the same logic ohko moves can be checked by pkmn with sturdy, and swagger can be checked by pkmn with own tempo/magic bounce/lum berry! as i said above, those mons you mentioned aren't good scald counters. and what do you mean by banning scald disallows defensive playstyles? what kind of defensive team is this that relies on a 30% rate to counter relevant threats?? a team consisting of maggron/defog mence/aromatisse/shedinja/curse lax/roserade can pretty much cover every relevant threat a HO team can throw vs it, without resorting to scald. in fact, scald gone only makes that team better since now mence/lax switch-in freely against mono attacking bulky waters!
edit: lol i'm not offended or anything, this is just supposed to be a debate!
I know this isn't like a real team, but considering hyper offense is the king of pressure and mence+maggron are really easily worn down that team really isn't going to handle HO very well- especially considering the only way of getting rid of rocks is mence who is weak to them and loses against prominent setters like the nidos, and at that point sheddy is useless opening huge holes in the team to the likes of nasty plot luc and general psychic types.

I haven't even tried stall on the no scald ladder yet, I've just been messing around with fun gimmicks (Life Orb tangrowth is p good, SD exeggutor is not), but ill have a go at it soon enough. Will probably just end up running roar along with surf on the bulky waters that get it. I imagine gourgeist, weezing and arcanine will be pretty good in a meta revelling in the lack of burns.

Also have zero idea on how to cope with gatr now it doesn't need sub to set up and can afford extra coverage.
 
So an interesting thing I'm noticing on this ladder is that without Scald, Haxorus is rising to become almost as useful as Salamence. Without needing Lum anymore it can now use Life Orb, which means it does considerably more damage from the get-go, and with bulky Waters often packing Ice Beam to deal with Dragon switch-ins since they can no longer rely on the burn threat to keep them at bay, the fact that it can survive an IB is pretty significant. It also gets Taunt, which Mence would kill to have.

Not saying it outclasses Mence, because Mence is still one of the most versatile and powerful mons in the tier. Just saying that whereas previously I rarely found a good reason to use Hax over Mence, now it's actually pretty decent.
Yea this is something to note. With no more Scald, a lot of physical attackers can drop Lum Berry/Sub in favour of boosting item/coverage move, making them a lot more dangerous potentially. DD Haxorus/Mence with Life Orb are evident examples; some people had already mentioned DD Gatr and SD Virizion; then there are also stuff like SS Cloyster and CB Goodra. Not to mention the Megas that really appreciate being able to not get burnt whilist trying to set up a sweep like Sharpedo/SD Aboma/SD Absol. This meta is definitely more offensively oriented then just "people experimenting with physical attackers"
 
Suicine loses to most of the grass types, such as Shaymin and Roserade. Idk why ppl are crying. With things like banded heracross, any non-scarfed variant of mence, SD Lucario, SD Toxicroak, roar vapoeron, and SD aboma I don't see suicine being a suspect worthy mon. I think suicine is a mon that everyone should prepare for. Any team that is unable to deal with suicine is probably going to lose, but the same can be said about moxiemence, moxiehera, SD luc...

i think ppl are just jumping on the bandwagon because they find suicine annoying, not actually broken. it's a meta defining mon, like florges and hyredgion and nidoqueen. the role of suicine is usually a bulky slow sweeper (often times mono attacking). considering that is the main set, and that the other sets are mostly used in tournament play (offensive cm, tailwind + 2 attacks), i find it hard to believe everyone is having such a problem with it.
 
Suicine loses to most of the grass types, such as Shaymin and Roserade. Idk why ppl are crying. With things like banded heracross, any non-scarfed variant of mence, SD Lucario, SD Toxicroak, roar vapoeron, and SD aboma I don't see suicine being a suspect worthy mon. I think suicine is a mon that everyone should prepare for. Any team that is unable to deal with suicine is probably going to lose, but the same can be said about moxiemence, moxiehera, SD luc...

i think ppl are just jumping on the bandwagon because they find suicine annoying, not actually broken. it's a meta defining mon, like florges and hyredgion and nidoqueen. the role of suicine is usually a bulky slow sweeper (often times mono attacking). considering that is the main set, and that the other sets are mostly used in tournament play (offensive cm, tailwind + 2 attacks), i find it hard to believe everyone is having such a problem with it.
I agree, while it is quite centralizing, SO MANY CHECKS here's a list.
Toxicroak (
Sets up on it)
Abomasnow (sets up on it)
Heliolisk (smacks it with a stab thunderbolt)
Shaymin (
the sp.def drops are more common than scald burns)
Mega Sceptile (walls CroCune, SD checks it better though)
SD Taunt Panda (beats it in a 1v1)
Chesnaught
Virizion
(SD is probably the best check to all kinds of cunes)
Band Shao/ Life orb shao (2hko's it)
Sp.def Roserade
Band Kingdra
Specs Mowtom

All the mons are above C-rank so they're not "niche pokes".
Look at all these checks! I didn't even put down a single bulky water!
 
Ummm... Suicune is arguably the best pokemon in the entire tier as it is unstoppable after a even 1 calm mind boost. Most physical attackers struggle to even 2hko and none can 0hko it. It is weak before a calm mind on the specially defensive side of things but that is remedied in one turn. I would definitely be up for a suicune suspect under the reasoning that it restricts teambuilding.



However scald is not a big deal in my opinion. From what I've seen scald is just a deterrent to physical mons setting up. Anyone who banks on getting the scald burn to win matches is just asking to get exposed. A good player will find a way to deal with scald just as a good player finds a way to deal with any threat. Threats are meant to be countered not banned. We don't counter dynamicpunch, we find a way to beat it instead. We don't ban Sacred Fire, we play through it. I understand the point that scald's wide distribution is what makes it so dangerous, more so then a dynamic punch or sacred fire. But at the end of the day it's only 30% and a good player should have a way to beat bulky waters regardless.
Scald is just another part of the game, you either deal with it and its low 30% odds with a plethora of options including heal bell, dry skin, and water absorb, or you don't deal with it and get annoyed.
"A good player will find a way to deal with scald just as a good player finds a way to deal with any threat", then why have so many important league and tour matches (the places where the best players play) been decided by scald?

You don't deal with scald. You cross your fingers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 1, Guests: 0)

Top