No manaphy either... I always had faith in the voters, but this time they've screwed up.
I cannot help but feel the voters pool is somewhat biased.
It's funny because many of the people who got 1450 used shit like subchomp + para or drizzle or smashpassing to begin with.
The vast majority of people dislike this metagame. Whether things are broken or not shouldn't really matter (even though Drizzle is almost undeniably OP).
@those telling me to copy a team and ladder.
My singular vote wouldn't have made a difference at all. Why would I want to spend my time not enjoying the poor state of a metagame just to have all of that time spent not matter at all? I'm sorry I like to enjoy competitive Pokemon and not force myself to a ladder so that I can obtain some political figure point where ultimately it wouldn't matter anyway.
I disagree. I will never use a whether team for I find them cheap, and winning by haring a cheap strategy doesn't give me the same satasfation as winning with a non-cheap non-whether team. That doesn't mean I shouldn't have chance to vote, or not participate in conversations. Being honorable doesn't make me a second class citizen.
See, this is the problem. I don't think that a majority of voters this round laddered and strived to get to the top. They just used a weather team, think weather is ok and then find themselves at the top, able to vote. What do they vote for? for their strategy to be uber? of course not.
ok this process blows. somebody fix it.
Echoing goofball. I'm extremely disappointed with the lack of basic logic and common sense displayed by the voters. This goes for UU and LC as well. Something needs to change before this hole you have dug us into gets even deeper.
^ this all the way. I still am unable to believe that Drizzle stayed.
Can't agree with this more. Can't see how just random people (albeit good players) decide how a pokemon will be used for everyone.
This round's bans were epically disappointing. We spent an entire round... just to ban Garchomp. On top of that, Latios and Deoxys-S lost their suspect status. How the hell did they go from over 50% to that abysmal percentage they just got?
Can there be some rule against these kind of posts in the future? These posts filled with constant bitching don't add anything to this topic and quite honestly it is getting out of hand.For the love of god bring back the council! I've read the nomination sentences/paragraphs from some of the "qualified" voters and...a lot of them are just so biased and ill-informed. I gave them some credit that even though a good chunk of them run copy & paste teams (I've probably fought everyone on the ladder now), it has to take some skill to get that high on the ladder, but after this extremely disappointing round, I am just so ready for the Smogon Council to make a come-back.
I'd MUCH rather have a group of 20 or so people that know exactly what the hell they're talking about, and have proven it to us, making these decisions rather than 40 or 50 people with only half of them having any visible credibility outside of purely their ladder ranking.
I am just so disappointed by this round...
It has come to the point that i barely see anyone actually discussing the possible effects on the metagame by this vote, but instead whining about the suspect process and the knowledge of the voters.
For the record it used to be a rule back in D/P
Stark Mountain Rules said:Do not question the tiering of any Suspect that has gone through Stages 1 and 2 of the Suspect Test process. Besides the fact that all Suspects will be retested in Stage 3, weeks and weeks go into a respective Suspect's actual testing, and this grants those who qualify the fair right to vote on the Suspect. To think that your complaints are going to or should have any actual sway after this process is somewhat insulting to the community at large.
Please keep the intelligence level of your posts at a respectable level This may sound a little harsh, but it is necessary. Provide some thoughts and reactions in your posts. Simplistic replies to threads are neither necessary, nor acceptable. If you make a statement, back it up! Do not post arguments without backing, or you will feel the wrath of the moderators. We hate that. If you wish to contribute to discussions, you should read How to argue and start discussions by Tangerine first to prevent logical fallacies from happening.