i'd assume for the off chance your opponent is running foul playWhy would you want 0 IVs in the first place?
i'd assume for the off chance your opponent is running foul playWhy would you want 0 IVs in the first place?
Just curious, why would you want a neutral nature on them?
Just curious, why would you want a neutral nature on them?
Why would you want 0 IVs in the first place?
That makes sense, though I'm not sure most players have the patience for that.It's because neutral natured Pokemon can eat any berry without gettng confused, even after using a nature mint, so technically they're now the "best nature". It's only really relevant against mons that use trick, so you can give them a berry they won't like assuming someone went through the effort of getting a good nature on them. It's an edgecase sort of thing.
This however, is more relevant. 0 Atk IVs is prefered on Special Attackers because you take less from Foul Play, something that's gonna be relevant for Galarian Articuno!
That's precisely the problem: getting an optimal Pokemon is obnoxious.That makes sense, though I'm not sure most players have the patience for that.
Was a pleasure debating you. I started to think it was fakelmao guess this serves me right
(this is the part where everyone is obligated to laugh at me)
Personally hoping that these are actually just special, powerful breeds of rapidash that the king hadWonder if the similarities to Rapidash are intentional. A ghostly horse sounds like a corrupted magic horse, while an icy horse sounds like a reversed fiery horse. The manes even look kinda similar for both.
To your credit, you had me pretty convincedlmao guess this serves me right
(this is the part where everyone is obligated to laugh at me)
To be fair I actually like the lack of ankles. Reminds me of Bongo Bongo from Zelda.wow so game freak really plagiarised their own creation and didnt even bother giving "rapidash" actual ankles to make it less obvious?
View attachment 283622
It's because neutral natured Pokemon can eat any berry without gettng confused, even after using a nature mint, so technically they're now the "best nature". It's only really relevant against mons that use trick, so you can give them a berry they won't like assuming someone went through the effort of getting a good nature on them. It's an edgecase sort of thing
Pretty sure G-Zapdos (and possibly G-Moltres) is/are physical attackers.The birds roam? Bleh, that's gonna make getting 0 Attack IV Neutral nature birds a horrible task, isn't it? Hopefully you can save their location for easy soft reseting
The missing ankles are a completely random design element. It would be one thing if multiple body parts were unevenly disjointed: if the tail were in several parts, if the legs were broken in different places, or if the animal weren't otherwise completely smooth and immaculate.