xkcd, at least in its current form, is similar to garfield for dorks.
I say this mostly with love, as a dork who had xkcd and garfield phases, but I also do just think its quality is overrated, at least these days.
It sometimes cooks, and even when it doesn't it can net a smile from me, but the jokes are often pretty basic and/or tortured. I don't think its tremendously good or high effort, or maybe he's trying real hard but running out of ideas and time, which like I get, he's busier now and has made a zillion of these. I value xkcd for what it has done, and even for what it actively does to an extent.
I'll go over some in the past month and explain why I think they're weak or strong.
Some I Think Are Not Great
"Lol pointless wifi connection on household device" has been done to death, and this one isn't particularly interesting among them. MoistCr1TiKaL did the seminal joke here with his Juicero vid
8 years ago.
This is just such basic observational humor. For most standard units, 1 of it is reasonable, but for capacitance, 1 of it isn't reasonable. It's fine I guess, but not really a knee slapper.
The basic premise here is how painful it is to have an inaccessible electronic device play an annoying name. Compare it to this past comic below with a similar pretence. This past comic has buildup / escalation, it uses the darkness and text sizes of the medium for storytelling, and it has a much more natural text flow that isn't just clogging a brick paragraph at the bottom. Also this past comic with better execution was
10 years ago.
If you're particularly convinced by the newer BOOP! comic having the source of the sound unknown, I'd compare it to this earlier comic, which hits that premise harder and more creatively. Particularly compare the generic "revenge" motive to "black hat guy goes after the chair of the skeptics society," which is both a punchline and a fun instance of black hat guy being their miserable self.
OK, entirely new comic time.
This punchline is very unearned to me. Like, "Archaea has finally started harming humans" kind of kills in isolation, but it's so stilted to have the girl be so esoterically aggro on archaea, and then for a fairly stale "they're also in the room but unnoticed" setup. Like this is just a cheap setup for the premise.
The joke is that you add one to things. Not a killer I think.
So much text. Gobs and gobs of text. And ammonium hydroxide being the most crucial ingredient for... statistical methodology... is just so forced. "How did this get on the list?????" Is not super funny when you're the one who put it on the list for no reason, besides setting up that reaction, in a no-stakes fictional webcomic.
All this text and forcing for a punchline of "good science means working a layer deeper what you actually would think the issue is," which as before, he already did
much more snappily and deftly in the past. (I'm still not sure how much I like the comic below, I still think it's too cutesy and trying too hard to be counter-intuitive, but the delivery is definitely much stronger.)
Some I Think Are Good
This recent one also has a clumpy bottom text block... and I think it's great. The relatively straightforward visuals and text are used to help the joke land, deadpan delivering this blatant energy theft as if it was a perfectly normal energy solution. The text even mimics real descriptions of heating systems with the "cool in the summer and warm in the winter" phrasing to sell the delivery.
The only weakness I think is the phrase "covertly-installed", which weakens the "as if normal" deadpan delivery by revealing the (author's knowledge of) the antisociality behind this energy theft. Covert installation is, um, implied already, even when you remove the phrase. Let's just say that. In fact, I think this
implication of covert installation is actively funnier than just saying "covertly installed" out loud.
This is a considerably stronger observational bit than the farad one to me. Here, he hammers in just
how weird it is to have "modern" epochal nomenclature, showing
5 different periods that all somehow share this
one issue. I view this fuller demonstration as considerably defter than selling the weirdness by having the oc's react alarmed. I'd balk at blaming historians for this nomenclature, but whatever.
This is fun. It starts in a pretty nerdy, text-heavy delivery typical of xkcd, and then cuts to something unexpected that both subverts the pure text of the initial delivery, and subverts its spirit too. And it's just fun and funny to imagine a cat jumping up at a plane to knock it out of the sky. I try not to be insatiably pretentious. A thing can just be silly and fun.