Challenge: COMPLETE!
Just finished watching
Manos. It's not on Netflix's instant service and I didn't want to wait to have a DVD shipped, so unfortunately I had to settle for a digital stream on my laptop - not an ideal way to watch a film, but for something like this I don't think I was doing anyone a major disservice.
Explaining why this was a bad film is like trying to explain why cancer is bad, but for the sake of discussion and because the OP asked for it, I will oblige with a rant.
Tonally, I feel like this film can't seem to decide whether it wants to be a horror film or a high concept porno. A major contributor to this confusion is the music, which fluctuates between an energetic clarinet and an extremely repetitive piano cue, neither of which struck me as particularly frightening. Also adding to the creepy smut film vibe are a number of bizarre fetish moments - specifically, the scene in which the bad guys' multiple wives beat the shit out of each other while wearing revealing, see-through clothing.
It's hard to feel sympathy for any of the protagonists when they're written to be such dipshits. 'Mike', the male protagonist, is not only pants-on-head stupid, but is kind of a dick. When the family first arrives at the quaint cultist house (and it is just a house; nothing really foreboding or sinister about it), Torgo straight up says that they're unwelcome and that they should leave, but Mike just plows through the poor guy saying 'NO IT'S COOL WE'LL JUST STAY FOR THE NIGHT WON'T WE HONEY?' The Wife character, who I don't believe is ever named, constantly voices her worry and disapproval, but Mike doesn't really give a shit.
So we roll through the film, and although we're introduced to the villain 'The Master', and we're told by various characters that some sacrifice shit is going to go down, it doesn't ever seem like the protagonists are in any danger. The fucking wife almost sleeps through the entire night, and Mike spends nearly half the film tied to a tree (which took Torgo the entirety of an excruciatingly long, single shot to accomplish). Speaking of long shots, I feel like the director was trying to artificially pad the film for length. In the beginning especially, there's a number of extraneous shots of the family driving through the countryside. In other instances, we're just treated to very long shots in which nothing truly significant happens.
This leads me to the editing - I feel like the film maker just shot the film in chronological order, because instead of the typical shot-reverse shot format, whole conversations play out in which there is a different shot composition every time a character is cut to. Also weird is that there's a ton of jump-cuts throughout the film. I don't know if this was a mistake, or if the director just saw Jean-Luc Godard's
Breathless and wanted to be a boss too. In any case, it didn't work.
What surprised me though, was that the film had flashes of 'brilliance' (I use this term very,
very lightly.) In a better film, the relationship between The Master and Torgo could've been interesting - think Igor getting sick of Dr. Frankenstein's shit. The Master's costume is pretty sweet, in a campy, comic book-y way. The shot in which we first see The Master is compositionally kind of cool, but I'm now convinced it must have been a mistake. Like the rest of the movie.
I haven't got around to the acting yet, and I can largely sum it up with just 'awful' (surprise surprise). I want to touch on The Master though, because he looks and acts like he was recruited at the local 7-11. He also adds to the overall porno vibe with that epicly luscious 'stache. His performance is characterized by staring 'menacingly' into the camera lens, and laughing less like an evil mastermind and more like he's about as amused with the film as I was. As for Torgo, I think he must have been crippled, or had a form of Tourette Syndrome, or both. After reading a little bit about the film, apparently he was supposed to be a satyr or something, which explains the way he moved. Still, very bizarre.
All in all, I'd label this film as
highly enjoyable. Definitely a Z-Movie gem. I had plenty of lol moments, particularly the SHOCKING finale. A must see if you're into shitty movies.
are we talking enjoyably-bad? if so, ladies and gentlemen, i introduce to you...
the toxic avenger!
I quote this not because I've seen the Toxic Avenger, but I
have seen another Troma film that is definitely worth seeing for this thread...