I'll do Forretress.Forretress is up for grabs as the previous author is too busy to have it done.
Excuse me but you got no permission to write this Pokemon. I explained via PM very clearly why I and other QC members won't allow this thing to get a preview. Sorry.After gaining permisson, I reserve Cradily.
I have used Omastar for the past ~3 years extensively both in gen 5 and 6 and feel that it is decent enough to get a preview. It can be added to the list.Gothitelle is in QC 0/3
Mamoswine is complete
I'll be posting my WIP on Dugtrio (finally) later today.
And lastly, here are a few Pokemon worthy of OU analyses imo not on the list: Staraptor, Magneton, Ludicolo, and Omastar.
I don't see Raichu being viable in OU this Gen despite the speed buff. I'm going to say no on this. Unless the qc members say otherwise.I've never done one of these for smogon before, but can i do Raichu? I don't see anyone having done it yet.
I have an approval from PK Gaming that says otherwise. Here is evidence.Excuse me but you got no permission to write this Pokemon. I explained via PM very clearly why I and other QC members won't allow this thing to get a preview. Sorry.
So does that mean i can make it? If you guys don't like it you can take it down.I don't see Raichu being viable in OU this Gen despite the speed buff. I'm going to say no on this. Unless the qc members say otherwise.
Edit: Yes. Gary2346 you can take it.
There seems to have been some miscommunication, but after a discussion with PK Gaming we agree that Cradily should not get an analysis. Sorry.I have an approval from PK Gaming that says otherwise. Here is evidence.
If it is not approved by a QC member, and is not on the list, you cannot make an analysis about it.So does that mean i can make it? If you guys don't like it you can take it down.
Thank you for your time.There seems to have been some miscommunication, but after a discussion with PK Gaming we agree that Cradily should not get an analysis. Sorry.