VS.
Career pass completion %: 58.4% vs. 61.8%: DALTON WINS
Career YPA: 7.08 vs. 7.02: BASICALLY A TIE
Career Interceptions/Game: 0.96 vs. 1.00: BASICALLY A TIE
Career high Completion %: 61.7% vs. 64.2%: DALTON WINS
Career TDs/Attempt: 0.0468 vs. 0.0479: BASICALLY A TIE
Career Receiving TDs: 0 vs. 1: DALTON WINS
Luck is not the problem ailing the Colts, but he sure as hell isn't the solution. Things are not going to get better once he signs his $25 million a year contract. Luck has 2 things going for him that inflate his status in the public's perception: ESPN touting him as the greatest-prospect-ever since college, and high volume passing stats. He's not some football savant, or legendary talent, or even an elite quarterback. Sadly, ESPN will never let the public forget about him like they basically have about Matt Stafford, so if his average play continues to drop into "bad" territory (regardless of whether it's his, the O-Line's, or the coaches' fault) he will continue to be crucified. He doesn't even have a ring to hide behind like Flacco does.
...Now, I'm not saying Luck is an average or bad quarterback. It's just, quite frankly, he does not deserve one quarter of the praise he gets. Regardless at what stat you look at, Luck is either barely top-10 or outside the top-10 in terms of efficiency or value. This is only his fourth year, and in his third he set career highs in just about everything, but he still isn't where the public perceives him to be. There's nearly a dozen old farts in front of him that he simply isn't better than yet.
P.S.: the stats are mostly an exercise in how you can manipulate stats to fit whatever you're trying to claim, I don't actually think Andrew Luck = Andy Dalton :^) :^)