"has what it takes to fill the roll" you mean read a teleprompter? By this standard Trump's a great president.
Hope the corona fairy pays Bernie a visit, because that's the only way this primary is going to end, isn't it? He's a millionaire anyway; he'll be fine.
bErNiE sUpPoRtErS aRe ToXiChttps://billypenn.com/2020/03/13/be...ive-campaign-offices-in-joe-bidens-native-pa/
Hope the corona fairy pays Bernie a visit, because that's the only way this primary is going to end, isn't it? He's a millionaire anyway; he'll be fine.
Not cool my dude.
Seems like barring an entirely separate act of God (Trump is currently acing the Coronavirus)
I'm personally voting for Biden despite my utter disgust if he's ultimately the nominee. But I don't blame anyone who sits it out. I know so many people in my generation who have been completely destroyed by the neoliberalism that started in the Clinton years (people just like the ones in that article), and now they're being asked to vote for it? Yeah, no surprises or blame for sitting that one out.
Bernie did the progressive movement an error by running this time. He should have endorsed Senator Warren from the beginning. She was a candidate that could have been competitive with the moderate wing in this primary. Truth is, Bernie took voters from her, not vice versa.
progress has to be consistently defended? by joe "nothing would fundamentally change" biden? and then you have the gall to talk about purity? this just makes it clear to me that you don't understand the actual progressive values people are talking about or that you haven't really engaged with real voters.We have to be adults about this. Clinton was probably the best President since LBJ. Purity destroys the progressive issues we care about. Trump getting another term means nothing will get done on health care, climate, and infrastructure for 4 more years. It also means the same generation of younger voters will only get their accomplishments thwarted by the extreme right wing judiciary that will be cemented for the next 50 years. Sitting out is not an option. In my view, people who sit out are lying about their progressivism.
Progress has to be continuously defended. The right wing takes every chance they can to move in the other direction. This is cycle is about defense. Does anyone think Medicare for all can survive a 7-2 conservative Supreme Court?
ok come on. they both ran. warren lost (because she campaigned worse and her clinton-lite advisers took over her campaign). voters had multiple months to decide between bernie and warren, the progressive vote literally consolidated around bernie while both were in the race and seen as solid contenders.
progress has to be consistently defended? by joe "nothing would fundamentally change" biden? and then you have the gall to talk about purity? this just makes it clear to me that you don't understand the actual progressive values people are talking about or that you haven't really engaged with real voters.
this kind of centrist neoliberalist ideology -- namely "we're not gonna help your life but LOOK at how bad orange guy is" -- is exactly what gets us a "burn the system down" candidate like trump. you want to know how i know? 2016.
also regarding the supreme court point: what if joe has to "compromise" with mcconnell like he "compromised" with republicans on clarence thomas? or the iraq war? his principles have clearly wavered over the years. republicans are going to turn out this year, us getting the senate back is not a done deal by any means.
i'd probably suck it up and vote biden if he's the nominee because i care about getting trump out of office, but if you think shaming voters into voting for your terrible candidate is the way to go ("let's be ADULTS here", because ADULTS really seemed to care about climate change so far), you're dead wrong.
yes because warren didn't endorse sanders. now i wonder why the so-called progressive didn't endorse the other progressive in the race, when the only other candidate remaining in the race (i know tulsi's in but yea) was the guy she came into politics to oppose (google "biden warren credit card" if you'd like).Both of them running was the mistake. Had Bernie endorsed Warren and sat out, Warren would have a strong enough coalition to challenge Biden. The reality is a lot of Warren voters did not crossover to Sanders. However, in Warren vs Biden, the Sanders base + the Warren base could have the numbers to challenge Joe (not to mention Warren would destroy him in a one on one debate). Take a breath and think about what I’m saying.
yet you're telling these "real voters" -- who definitely never vote btw, I assume they're the target of your posts -- that they'd be making a huge mistake in not voting biden? if they never vote anyway, leave them alone man!Bullshit. Those “real voters” did not turn out to vote. Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and the Clinton’s are not the enemy.
okay i'll admit you lost me. joe's gonna lose, and joe's gonna veto medicare for all anyway (he literally admitted to this). if i'm someone who supports medicare for all, i assume i'd volunteer for bernie and try showing people why he's the better candidate (because pretty much all bernie supporters see the innumerable flaws biden poses, and why he will almost certainly lose to trump unless the coronavirus gets even worse [entirely possible]). joe is gonna lead to that 7-2 conservative supreme court, and in these voters' eyes their vote does absolutely nothing to change that.Shame is not the point. Medicare for all will never survive a 7-2 conservative Supreme Court.
Clinton's neoliberalism was ruinous for both my generation and the Democratic party as a whole.We have to be adults about this. Clinton was probably the best President since LBJ.
u could just, like, go to google or duckduckgo or whatever, type one of these names in + a key phrase like "wall street executives" or "goldman sachs" or something along those lines and see what you find. it should be common knowledge at this point that party elites on either side of the aisle are heavily influenced by big corporations and the financial sector, in fact to the point where this political system governs moreso in the name of them than in the name of the people they purportedly represent. any political actor who is not at least critical of that is, in a sense, the enemy. anyone running for office who does not understand the likes of the financial sector, private pharmaceutical companies, and agribusiness (to name but a few sectors) to be fundamentally opposed to the interests of "ordinary citizens" should not be understood as an ally to any serious progressive causeJoe Biden, Barack Obama, and the Clinton’s are not the enemy.
yes because warren didn't endorse sanders. now i wonder why the so-called progressive didn't endorse the other progressive in the race, when the only other candidate remaining in the race (i know tulsi's in but yea) was the guy she came into politics to oppose (google "biden warren credit card" if you'd like).
Now I'd argue Warren lost because, maybe, she never really seemed committed to these progressive values above political expediency. The cycle showed the weaknesses in her political instinct (leaking the Bernie is a secret sexist stuff, trying to hammer every candidate in the debates like whack-a-mole, flip-flopping on Medicare for All). It also showed that Warren really isn't as popular as people think; especially on the Republican side, she just is not a popular candidate and I think this election cycle hurt her reputation among the consolidated progressive base a lot.
i'd bet good money warren would lose to trump btw; democrats in the debates played with kiddie gloves. even if trump is a terrible debater he wouldn't be afraid of bringing out the greatest hits in terms of the warren oppo research (i assume you have to know what i'm talking about)
yet you're telling these "real voters" -- who definitely never vote btw, I assume they're the target of your posts -- that they'd be making a huge mistake in not voting biden? if they never vote anyway, leave them alone man!
okay i'll admit you lost me. joe's gonna lose, and joe's gonna veto medicare for all anyway (he literally admitted to this). if i'm someone who supports medicare for all, i assume i'd volunteer for bernie and try showing people why he's the better candidate (because pretty much all bernie supporters see the innumerable flaws biden poses, and why he will almost certainly lose to trump unless the coronavirus gets even worse [entirely possible]). joe is gonna lead to that 7-2 conservative supreme court, and in these voters' eyes their vote does absolutely nothing to change that.
this is on top of the fact that your ilk shamed people into voting for clinton; how'd that work out? there's a lot of people that are tired of holding their nose and voting for the lesser of two evils (literally not me, like i said i'd vote for biden)
Clinton's neoliberalism was ruinous for both my generation and the Democratic party as a whole.
edit: To clarify what I mean by the latter, I'm talking about turning the Democratic party into the party of NAFTA + the party of gun control, thus removing it from viability from pretty much every southern state. I've talked to people here who are still registered Democrats yet haven't voted for a Democrat since Clinton was president, saying "I didn't leave the Democratic party, the Democratic party left me". This only came up because we were talking about the upcoming governor election in NYS, I would have never guessed that otherwise.
u could just, like, go to google or duckduckgo or whatever, type one of these names in + a key phrase like "wall street executives" or "goldman sachs" or something along those lines and see what you find. it should be common knowledge at this point that party elites on either side of the aisle are heavily influenced by big corporations and the financial sector, in fact to the point where this political system governs moreso in the name of them than in the name of the people they purportedly represent. any political actor who is not at least critical of that is, in a sense, the enemy. anyone running for office who does not understand the likes of the financial sector, private pharmaceutical companies, and agribusiness (to name but a few sectors) to be fundamentally opposed to the interests of "ordinary citizens" should not be understood as an ally to any serious progressive cause