• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Academy Awards Reaction Thread

What? That isn't at all what cinematography is restricted to. Post-production is just as important as production. How about instead of speaking about insults to people who shouldn't at all be insulted, you stop insulting the folks who pour hours of every day into creating visual masterpieces like Life of Pi?

So how come Wreck-it Ralph wasn't nominated for cinematography? Or Brave? How come a 1% live action movie that's almost completely post production is more eligible than either of those? If this is the criteria for cinematography, Brave definitely did that a fuckton better. Either way, it definitely didn't deserve the award.

Also keep in mind that I am not insulting Life of Pi (as I've already said), I'm insulting the Academy for being shallow and biased against animated films. And, either way, you're getting really pissy because (you thought) I had negative things to say about a movie that you liked. How about instead of getting mad at people on the internet, you learn what an opinion is?
 
Chill out pluffers, those are actually pretty tame compared to what Seth usually does. I understand that some people may be offended, but I'd bet the majority of people found it pretty funny, and while he gets close, he never really crosses the line, and that's kind of been the way McFarlane has been for years. I for one, found the Oscars actually watchable for once, and Seth can be thanked for that. It was so much different from the usual bog standard crap we see year after year, where I'd much rather check results the day after instead of wasting time listening to blahblah bad joke, blahblah here are the nominees, blahblah bog standard acceptance speech. Just sit back and enjoy lol.

Well, I agree that what was on the Oscars was tame for Seth, and that I don't think that it was majorly offensive, so much as it just wasn't very tasteful, and more importantly, wasn't very funny. I was pretty bored listening to him, and didn't think that his jokes were particularly witty so much as they were juvenile (they were too crude to be tasteful but couldn't push things enough to be really funny, so it felt like a bad in-between for me). I wouldn't say the majority of people found it really funny either, as maybe it's just the people I know, but I've been hearing mixed reviews on his performance (it was pretty polarizing usually, with people either loving it or hating it). I thought that it was passable, but wasn't anything special.
 
That Foodfight! trailer? I've never been so convinced that I was watching a fake trailer in my life.

I'd link you to the full movie, but I can't find it anywhere, as the company who made it took it down and flagged every other upload of it as soon as they realized people were making fun of them. Here's an abridged version, though:

[youtube]8-uIkcPfOCA[/youtube]

I boycotted this years show the minute I saw Cloud Atlas was not nominated for anything... one of the most ambitious films I have ever seen ignored, with a lot of "been there, done that" getting all the acclaim. Meh.

Welcome to the Academy, a bunch of shallow snobs who only like "artsy" movies "based on a true story" that are made within a month of the deadline. Also anything that's fully animated is segregated into a single category where Pixar always wins if it's nominated except for Monsters Inc. and Cars. So, obviously, the same kinds of films are gonna win every year.

At least it's not the Razzies who give all the awards to one movie (last year Jack and Jill literally got every single award, even worst rip-off, remake, or sequel because [I shit you not] they said the crossdressing was ripping off Ed Wood's "Glen or Glenda?").
 
I didn't watch any (as I generally hate the artsy snobs), but saw Brave won over Wreck It Ralph, which was my wtf moment...granted, I haven't seen Brave technically, and being a Pixar movie I know it'll be good since they generally make great movies outside of Cars. But beating something as stupendously awesome as Wreck It Ralph? Fuck no >.>
 
Haven't seen Brave yet unfortunately but I have a tough time believing any Pixar movie is "utter shit". There's bad, and there's Pixar's bad.

The problem isn't that Brave is bad, per se, it's that compared to Paranorman, WIR and even Frankenweenie, it had far too many faults to have legitimately won the award.

Imo, Paranorman really deserved it.
 
The problem isn't that Brave is bad, per se, it's that compared to Paranorman, WIR and even Frankenweenie, it had far too many faults to have legitimately won the award.

Imo, Paranorman really deserved it.
Mmm, oddly I hated Paranorman actually, I thought it was a big letdown compared to what the commercials made it sound like.
 
Went through the whole thread and didn't see Jennifer Lawrence's winner's press conference interview thing. Oh my god this woman is golden hahahahahahaha. And since I have no clue how to make it show the video player, I'll just put the link here:
http://youtu.be/1ACQpZW-eTg
 
That just made me love her even more. Holy damn. Brilliant stuff.

Id like to say the shot effected her comments and movement, but she does shit like that all the time.

I'm glad she made those ridiculous questions seem even more ridiculous.

Average Jane ftw.
 
So how come Wreck-it Ralph wasn't nominated for cinematography? Or Brave? How come a 1% live action movie that's almost completely post production is more eligible than either of those? If this is the criteria for cinematography, Brave definitely did that a fuckton better. Either way, it definitely didn't deserve the award.

Also keep in mind that I am not insulting Life of Pi (as I've already said), I'm insulting the Academy for being shallow and biased against animated films. And, either way, you're getting really pissy because (you thought) I had negative things to say about a movie that you liked. How about instead of getting mad at people on the internet, you learn what an opinion is?
They didn't like the framing, use of light, or one of the many other things that matters in cinematography? They're biased pieces of shit against animated movies? Plenty of reasons.
 
all i have to say is there is certainly nothing average about miss lawrence, no-sir-ee
 
Welcome to the Academy, a bunch of shallow snobs who only like "artsy" movies "based on a true story" that are made within a month of the deadline. Also anything that's fully animated is segregated into a single category where Pixar always wins if it's nominated except for Monsters Inc. and Cars. So, obviously, the sane kinds of films are gonna win every year.

you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. argo sure was 'artsy' right?? the academy has a predictable palate but 'artsy' is certainly not it.

Seth McFarlane loves to push the boundary, this we and everyone else in the Western world all know. Yet people tuned in to the Oscar anyways. Nobody put a gun to these people's heads and forced you to watch him crack a joke at everyone and everything, they made a conscious decision to tune in knowing what was in store. In fact, I guarantee that a large portion of the audience, myself included, only watched because it was McFarlane hosting, and the fact that the ratings were so much higher than previous years attests to that. Honestly, if people are sself-conscious about being overweight or feminists etc, they probably would've done themselves a favor by turning off the TV and watching replays later. Instead they decided to take in each and every word from the guy who produces Family Guy and American Dad, and bash him on Twitter/Facebook after. In fact, I speculate that some viewers only watched because of Seth McFarlane, but for different reasons than people like myself. These social media white knights probably couldn't wait for Seth to slip up and would love nothing more than bash him all over the internet the day after. Honestly they're a bunch of tools and should probably get those pencils out of their asses.

TLDR: If someone get easily offended, don't watch. Life goes on. Don't walk into a McDonalds and come out pissed because they wouldn't serve you escargot.

On a lighter note. Jennifer Lawrence is quickly becoming one of my favorite celebrities. Unlike every other Hollywood actress obsessed with their public image, this girl doesn't have a care in the world. It's adorable.

wow, who would have thought that a seth macfarlane fan would have terrible opinions about everything

while i would never tell a person that they cannot make a joke, i would never tell a person that they cannot be offended by a joke either.
 
wow, who would have thought that a seth macfarlane fan would have terrible opinions about everything

while i would never tell a person that they cannot make a joke, i would never tell a person that they cannot be offended by a joke either.

I never said that they can't be legitimately offended by a joke. I'm saying that if you go into something knowing you're going to be offended, why complain about it to the world when it happens? Most of his jokes on Sunday were nothing compared to what he does on Family Guy/American Dad. In fact I agree with Audiosurfer that him holding back actually kind of took away from the night, and a number of his jokes fell flat. But a few of them like the Lincoln and Mel Gibson jokes were pure gold (seriously if these two jokes offended someone, then they have some serious issues).

The biggest problem I have is that some of the people who were "offended" actually have nothing to do with the group in question either (5'4 90 pound girls on Twitter posting that they want to punch Seth McFarlane for a fat joke).
 
They're biased pieces of shit against animated movies?

I'm insulting the Academy for being shallow and biased against animated films.



you have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. argo sure was 'artsy' right?? the academy has a predictable palate but 'artsy' is certainly not it.

"Here's a single outlier (that actually isn't because "based on a true story"), therefore literally everything you have said is wrong."
 
IThe biggest problem I have is that some of the people who were "offended" actually have nothing to do with the group in question either (5'4 90 pound girls on Twitter posting that they want to punch Seth McFarlane for a fat joke).

You like to make a lot of assumptions about other people and tell other people what they can and cannot be offended by for someone who says they don't. You've drawn a line in the sand defined by your own lived experiences and expect everyone else to live up to it, and you cannot comprehend the idea that other people's lives don't conform to it. That a lot of those jokes might offend those girls because they're offensive to women in general (not necessarily every woman, but women), or because they have/had eating disorders and/or body image issues, or because they were fat once, or because they just plain think it was mean and wrong and don't like body shaming and that you don't have to be targeted by name by something to have speak out against something you think is wrong (this involves empathy, or just listening to other people's perspectives and trying to see it their way). I know the last one is terribly revolutionary.

I said I wouldn't engage -- I really, truly didn't want to derail the thread and start up a fuss, although the discussion continued independently of me anyway -- but then you literally told me as someone who had just announced themselves as an eating disorder survivor to sit back and enjoy eating disorder jokes (you didn't know that I grew up and live surrounded by domestic abuse, either, and I don't hold you accountable for that, but I still expressed my discomfort and you talked down to me about it), so I thought sticking up for myself was in order. Not to make a point to you, because I don't expect you to change your mind, but because my perspective is actually really relevant as an eating disorder survivor. Someone who has actually been through severe eating disorder relapses and required medical attention for them in the past.

The McDonalds thing is a false equivalency because, regardless of your fanboyish assertions about Seth MacFarlane, most people don't watch the Academy Awards for Seth MacFarlane. They watch them for the Academy Awards, and it's not unreasonable to say that something offends you. I had McNuggets and they fucking sucked. And then I went home and threw them up because lol eating disorders, right? If the world is really inclusive to you and you don't have to worry about things like that, then it can be really easy to not realise what it's like. But if things that have no reason to be unwelcoming to you are hostile to you for no apparent reason, then you would speak out against it too.

This has nothing to do with the Academy Awards, but it's a comparison (not perfect, but food for thought): I'm disabled, I have a walking frame and many special needs, and the world is only in part physically accessible to me. A lot of it is actually quite dangerous to me for no good reason. Are you going to tell me I should stay at home and not participate in things that have nothing to do with my disabilities? Maybe the world should consider being inclusive of me and people like me. It's not possible for me to be an abled person, and there are things that the world cannot just 'get rid of', but there are things that the world can do better so that I can participate in society. Maybe we can reach a compromise. Just maybe. It's the same thing here, and please don't even start to imply it's different here because I choose to be offended and don't choose to be disabled. It's ignorant and misses the point of what I was trying to say entirely (also you'll make me have to explain eating disorders and how they work to you, and that has nothing to do with the Academy Awards either).

Yes, I know the world isn't going to change itself for me. As arrogant as this is, I probably know it a lot better than you do because of those experiences. But it doesn't mean I can't say something bothers me, because it deserves to be said, and I think as individuals we can stand to rethink our actions when someone says 'hey, that hurts' and listen and try to understand their point and maybe learn from it, and that humour isn't immune to criticism. I just want to go about my life, and I shouldn't have to do it silently, biting my lip rather than saying respectfully that something might be a bit of an issue.

If you make it hard for people to say they don't like something, then you can't pretend that because they don't speak up about it that everyone likes it. And if you go 'la la la not listening' or dismiss it when people say they don't like something based on your own assumptions about their lives / motivations or your own criteria about whether they 'get' to be offended or not (who made you the authority?), then your judgment of the situation is terribly flawed. A lot of people enjoyed Seth's humour. That's not surprising, and it shouldn't be surprising to anyone. It's actually not all that edgy or courageous, really. But some people didn't, and that's valid too.

P.S. I watched like five episodes of Family Guy in my life, ever. I'm truly not on a mission to destroy the guy. I'm not sure why you can't fathom that people might have a problem with these things that's divorced entirely from Seth MacFarlane...
 
If you make it hard for people to say they don't like something, then you can't pretend that because they don't speak up about it that everyone likes it. And if you go 'la la la not listening' or dismiss it when people say they don't like something based on your own assumptions about their lives / motivations or your own criteria about whether they 'get' to be offended or not (who made you the authority?), then your judgment of the situation is terribly flawed. A lot of people enjoyed Seth's humour. That's not surprising, and it shouldn't be surprising to anyone. It's actually not all that edgy or courageous, really. But some people didn't, and that's valid too.

It's too bad that this great point gets lost all the time. People have every right to be offended, and people like Jumpluff have every right to say "well I hated that so they should either change or I stop watching." What a nice, reasonable post.

Unfortunately this gets stuck between the people who say "I'm personally offended, so this needs to be banned for everyone" and the ones who say "if you dont like it, stfu"
 
Damn why the fuck is everyone salty in this thread? All you people do is complain and can't find enjoyment for what it is. I am afraid to read the first 3 pages in fear it's just more constant bitching.

I wanted Bradley Cooper to win, but taking the award from Daniel Day Lewis is a tough feat. I predicted JLaw and Christoph Waltz and Anne Hathaway to win so I was fairly pleased about that. Ben Affleck not being nommed for Best Director was a scandal, but whatever, I like Ang Lee and have heard Life of Pi was a beautiful movie. When it comes to best picture, I didn't mind Argo at all. It was a good movie, while I wanted Silver Linings or Django (highly unlikely) to win, I was not displeased by Argo winning.

Now can you people try mentioning something positive you enjoyed? Or you just gonna be on each others nuts all night. (jrr, you can stay on my nuts if you want <3)
 
wait is this a thread about seth mcfarlane's jokes or a reaction to which movies won the night

also @the question asked to me earlier:

i have seen wreck-it ralph and frankenweenie. i thought wreck-it ralph was great, loads better than frankenweenie. i'm really tired of tim burton as it is, but then again, i'm never tired of disney so maybe i'm just being biased. i just think if an award was presented to brave, which it was, i believe it deserves it.
 
Wreck-it Ralph really deserved that award. Brave was good, but I felt it was a bit of a mess of concepts and ideas, and really didn't hit the Pixar standards that Up made perfect a few years ago. Wreck-it Ralph has some of the most enjoyable animated characters I've ever seen, and is one of like four movies I was willing to see multiple times in the theaters. Brave, eh, it bored me the second time I watched it.
 
Back
Top