• Follow our Instagram!
  • Curious about what we're currently doing about bots? Check out the latest updates from staff in this thread.

anyone play magic?

what should the saga be named then? It'll be a reference to the war 3,000+ years ago, but I dunno what to call it. I have "The War of Power" right now, but that seems bland
 
I was thinking that maybe to lower the wordload a bit, changing next evolution from an italicized ability to a keyword might be useful! Here's a lil family line I made to display it.

Scorbunny.png
Raboot.png
Cinderace.png


also yes im starting to get completely hyperfixated on this its crazy @@
 
If i remember correctly, an aura entering the field under your control, without being cast, forces the you attach the aura to a target of their choice (however this action doesn’t actually target, auras are fucked)
 
Gravity Monkey said:
I was thinking that maybe to lower the wordload a bit, changing next evolution from an italicized ability to a keyword might be useful! Here's a lil family line I made to display it.

View attachment 517176

also yes im starting to get completely hyperfixated on this its crazy @@
Click to expand...
Click to collapse...
I'd also propose one more change:
Gigantimax - 4RR, Exile Cinderace: From your library, hand, or from outside the game, search for a card named The Blazing Sport, and put it onto the battlefield with three Dynamax counters on it. On your upkeep, remove a Dynamax counter. When The Blazing Sport has no Dynamax counters on it, exile it and return Cinderace to the battlefield tapped.
 
Candelia said:
okay but what happens to enchantments like
Realmbreaker's Grasp - March of the Machine - Magic: The Gathering's Grasp - March of the Machine - Magic: The Gathering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse...

Actually, nothing of substance happens when court change is used on an enchantment like this. The aura starts out under your control, attached to an opponent's thing (presumably) and ends under their control attached to their thing. It doesn't move, and still turns off their thing as if they had decided to play it on their own guy. While sacrificing enchantments is uncommon, the opponent would now be able to do that to pay some cost. It would also matter for effects like devotion which keep track of the white pips on permanents you control. To write Court Change in a way that would move auras, you'd have to do something like exiling them first and returning them to the battlefield under the other player's control.
 
Blazade said:
Actually, nothing of substance happens when court change is used on an enchantment like this. The aura starts out under your control, attached to an opponent's thing (presumably) and ends under their control attached to their thing. It doesn't move, and still turns off their thing as if they had decided to play it on their own guy. While sacrificing enchantments is uncommon, the opponent would now be able to do that to pay some cost. It would also matter for effects like devotion which keep track of the white pips on permanents you control. To write Court Change in a way that would move auras, you'd have to do something like exiling them first and returning them to the battlefield under the other player's control.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse...
yeah that would make sense, auras are weird.

<-- mardu player
 
I suppose with the super form can of worms somewhat open, we should consider which, if any, Megas should be implemented. Diancie feels like it's near the top of the list since as a gen 6 mon the base form may not have been designed to be fully independent. The other main groups I would consider are:

:lucario-mega::rayquaza-mega:: Significant parts of their games' lore.
:salamence-mega::gallade-mega::gardevoir-mega:: Referenced by Paradox mons
:sceptile-mega::blaziken-mega::swampert-mega:: While the XY starters don't have the ability to show off the gen 6 mechanic, the ORAS starters do.
:salamence-mega::gallade-mega::gardevoir-mega::metagross-mega:, arguably :absol-mega::gyarados-mega::camerupt-mega::sharpedo-mega:: Used by major NPCs in their debut games.
 
Ironmage said:
I suppose with the super form can of worms somewhat open, we should consider which, if any, Megas should be implemented. Diancie feels like it's near the top of the list since as a gen 6 mon the base form may not have been designed to be fully independent. The other main groups I would consider are:

:lucario-mega::rayquaza-mega:: Significant parts of their games' lore.
:salamence-mega::gallade-mega::gardevoir-mega:: Referenced by Paradox mons
:sceptile-mega::blaziken-mega::swampert-mega:: While the XY starters don't have the ability to show off the gen 6 mechanic, the ORAS starters do.
:salamence-mega::gallade-mega::gardevoir-mega::metagross-mega:, arguably :absol-mega::gyarados-mega::camerupt-mega::sharpedo-mega:: Used by major NPCs in their debut games.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse...
See, with this I was planning on The Ultimatum of Kalos to create a thing that spawns in mega rings, but I suppose a set of artifacts can be made to implement said megas.

Or we can just add "mega evolution" as an activated ability and be done with that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top