Because Evasion is very different from any other sort of hax.Hello fellow Smogoners, please enlighten me as to why are we voting on Brightpowder / Lax Incense but not on Quick Claw and Scope Lens, please.
And I have the feeling we should vote on Blaziken before voting on Drought, but too late, I guess...
Except that they aren't categorized under the Evasion Clause, because it explicitly refers to moves. If they're going to be banned, either we have to vote to amend the clause or they have to be banned on their own.brightpowder/lax incense is up for voting because it is categorized under the evasion clause, but not banned.
Uh what? *Points at join date*. I know perfectly well what's going on, I play a lot and follow the thread. I'm just saying that people should go further in their nominations than a few sentences that explain nothing. Why should your nomination be counted if you can't be convincing at all, even to those that know what you should be saying.
Because Evasion is very different from any other sort of hax.
Not that I would oppose a ban on Quick Claw and Scope Lens. I certainly wouldn't advocate for it, but I wouldn't advocate against it, either.
Quick Claw and evasion and paralyze hax and confusion hax are so closely related you can't simply state without evidence that evasion deserves to be discussed separately, or is a more pressing issue.Because Evasion is very different from any other sort of hax.
Not that I would oppose a ban on Quick Claw and Scope Lens. I certainly wouldn't advocate for it, but I wouldn't advocate against it, either.
I've given evidence, and I'll give it again. Paralyze hax requires hitting the opponent with a paralysis move at some point. Confusion hax requires hitting the opponent with a confusion sometime on their most recent switch-in. And before it gets brought up yet again, flinch hax requires moving first, then proceeding to hit the opponent with a flinch move every turn you want any chance of causing the hax. Evasion, on the other hand, applies to every Pokemon on the opponent's team indiscriminately. It's like the difference between Screech and Swords DanceQuick Claw and evasion and paralyze hax and confusion hax are so closely related you can't simply state without evidence that evasion deserves to be discussed separately, or is a more pressing issue.
And I have the feeling we should vote on Blaziken before voting on Drought, but too late, I guess...
I've given evidence, and I'll give it again. Paralyze hax requires hitting the opponent with a paralysis move at some point. Confusion hax requires hitting the opponent with a confusion sometime on their most recent switch-in. And before it gets brought up yet again, flinch hax requires moving first, then proceeding to hit the opponent with a flinch move every turn you want any chance of causing the hax. Evasion, on the other hand, applies to every Pokemon on the opponent's team indiscriminately. It's like the difference between Screech and Swords Dance
Evasion items and evasion abilities take it to an even more absurd level, since you don't need even a single turn of action to reap the benefits. You can't stack the boosts, but the immediate effect is far more significant. It's like comparing Swords Dance to Pure Power.
Quick Claw is also a passive effect, but it's also a completely different effect. As I said, I wouldn't oppose a ban on Quick Claw, but I also don't think it's relevant in the slightest.
how common is tail wind anyway?Tornadus goes "About to die? GIVE THE WHOLE DANG TEAM SWIFT SWIM FOR FOUR TURNS."
I don't see choice scarf garchomp revenging latios when latios now has 700 speed.
ok not trying to step on toes with this next comment
but lets be honest
people probably have been getting beaten by this "problem" pokemon while using their specific built teams. blaziken shouldnt get banned ..... i mean my god if any starter should get banned then blaziken (regardless) of ability should be at the end of the chopping block. infernape, emboar ,etc. these pokemon should be the 1st of any starters to be banned.
This mentality is bad - the whole "well, if any starter gets banned". It doesn't matter if it's a starter, legendary, or just a random Pokemon on the Pokedex, if it has the ability, stat distribution and overall effect on the metagame it can be broken.ok not trying to step on toes with this next comment
but lets be honest
people probably have been getting beaten by this "problem" pokemon while using their specific built teams. blaziken shouldnt get banned ..... i mean my god if any starter should get banned then blaziken (regardless) of ability should be at the end of the chopping block. infernape, emboar ,etc. these pokemon should be the 1st of any starters to be banned.
ok that maybe true but im looking at it from this perspective. blaziken is easy to handle.
its defenses dont allow it to take hits so one psychic from a specs user or a stab brave bird from a scarf user and hes down for the count. infernape has all the right stats to do blazikens job and do it better. now if blaziken had bulk then id be all for him being sanctioned but with the 5th generation being this early out the gate i just dont see the point in blazikens new ability being banned before we get it "legally". like i said id be more worried if a bulky thing like emboar got speed boost but blaziken has always been something that needed a lot of team support and alot of setup to work. now i can already say that blaziken has to have 2 turns to become a "threat" with speed boost and even then blaziken is easy to put in check. from a physical spectrum u can use ghost types to make close combat ineffective and from a special spectrum a ghost type or a flash fire pokemon can take him pretty nicely. honestly the only time we need to get pissy about something is if glaceon got speed boost.
If Infernape got speed boost, then yes it would probably rape even more than Blaziken due to Nasty Plot, but the fact is, it doesn't. Even then, Infernape would take more from stuff like Conkledurr Mach Punch and takes something silly like 70% from CB Scizor Bullet Punch.ok that maybe true but im looking at it from this perspective. blaziken is easy to handle.
its defenses dont allow it to take hits so one psychic from a specs user or a stab brave bird from a scarf user and hes down for the count. infernape has all the right stats to do blazikens job and do it better. now if blaziken had bulk then id be all for him being sanctioned but with the 5th generation being this early out the gate i just dont see the point in blazikens new ability being banned before we get it "legally". like i said id be more worried if a bulky thing like emboar got speed boost but blaziken has always been something that needed a lot of team support and alot of setup to work. now i can already say that blaziken has to have 2 turns to become a "threat" with speed boost and even then blaziken is easy to put in check. from a physical spectrum u can use ghost types to make close combat ineffective and from a special spectrum a ghost type or a flash fire pokemon can take him pretty nicely. honestly the only time we need to get pissy about something is if glaceon got speed boost.
Evasion items and evasion abilities take it to an even more absurd level, since you don't need even a single turn of action to reap the benefits. You can't stack the boosts, but the immediate effect is far more significant. It's like comparing Swords Dance to Pure Power.
Brightpowder is equivalent to Pure Power now? That must be why every single thing that can is running it...
And what about Focus Band? It's basically exactly the same as Brightpowder, except the holder can be finished off by residual damage still/it powers up moves like Flail, Endeavour, Counter, etc. If you miss a Brightpowder holder and it KOs in return, that's practically identical to a Focus Band holder living and KOing in return.
You mean how we voted on Manaphy, Kingdra, Kabutops, and Ludicolo before we voted Drizzle? The ability breaks the pokemon, not the other way around.
2 Turn to become a threat : Turn 1 Switch on nattrei/something cant hit him and KO or SD with prediction and turn 2 protect
ok that maybe true but im looking at it from this perspective. blaziken is easy to handle.
its defenses dont allow it to take hits so one psychic from a specs user or a stab brave bird from a scarf user and hes down for the count.
infernape has all the right stats to do blazikens job and do it better.
now if blaziken had bulk then id be all for him being sanctioned but with the 5th generation being this early out the gate i just dont see the point in blazikens new ability being banned before we get it "legally".
like i said id be more worried if a bulky thing like emboar got speed boost
but blaziken has always been something that needed a lot of team support and alot of setup to work. now i can already say that blaziken has to have 2 turns to become a "threat" with speed boost and even then blaziken is easy to put in check. from a physical spectrum u can use ghost types to make close combat ineffective and from a special spectrum a ghost type or a flash fire pokemon can take him pretty nicely.
honestly the only time we need to get pissy about something is if glaceon got speed boost.