If your only loss is to the player who goes 5-0, and that loss is the final loss of the day, you're going to make top 4.The tournament does have a self-KO clause. However, they probably also allow intentional draws if both players agree to it. The Explosion thing at the end didn't actually mean anything. A 4-0-1 record guarantees placement while 4-1 does not. I'm not sure if Vash and 616 knew for certain that they would advance if they had a 4-1 record. If they didn't, a intentional draw was the right thing to do. While it is unfortunate what happened to zerowing, making sure you get get to the Worlds yourself should take priority. If they knew they were both safe, it probably would have been better for 616 to throw the match to help out zerowing. I'm not sure if this would have knocked alakapimp out of the Top 4, though. I'm also not sure they had enough time to figure all of this out.
Yeah, that's like Nintendo breaking their own rules. If they didn't intend on enforcing self-ko clause they should have taken it out of the rules.That's nowhere to be found in the rules, however. I can't imagine them "allowing" two players to call a draw, either.
He also put himself in the position where he would get the loss anyway since he broke one of the rules.In reality, Vash and 616 did exactly what the majority of us probably would have done. If you have the potential to gurantee your spot in the finals of an international tournament, would you have continued the match and possibly put yourself in the position where you could be eliminated later on? I know I wouldn't have. Yes, it completely screwed zerowing, but thats the game.
In reality, Vash and 616 did exactly what the majority of us probably would have done. If you have the potential to gurantee your spot in the finals of an international tournament, would you have continued the match and possibly put yourself in the position where you could be eliminated later on? I know I wouldn't have. Yes, it completely screwed zerowing, but thats the game.
That's nowhere to be found in the rules, however. I can't imagine them "allowing" two players to call a draw, either.
Whoah, Slimceagirl kicked ass. I had no idea she was so good.
Totally right.
You can't blame them one bit.
He also put himself in the position where he would get the loss anyway since he broke one of the rules.
I don't think Vash actually helped.
And how do you:"Secure your spot" not that it matters now , just wondering.
Exactly. Its a strategy, everyone went in with one. Sidd even changed his throughout the day. It was the strategy they used and they should be happy they realized they could both secure themselves a spot.
I am particularly surprised by Vash because it sounds like he could have secured his spot regardless. In the end, he helped another Smogoner, so why is he getting trashed?
If your only loss is to the player who goes 5-0, and that loss is the final loss of the day, you're going to make top 4.
Wow dude, harsh. So was the 2 point Infracture, I though you were only kidding, lol. I guess that can be removed (by you?) if somehow Infracts add up and get me to ICBB though. <3So I like to thank you two for being dumbfucks and not getting me a trip to San Deigo to participate. I can accept the 1 turn sleep, it was luck, luck is part of the game. But when you two decide to conspire to cause a tie, you didn't think of the implications of what would happen, and because you fuck faces decided to have some "fun" it trickles to me and and I suffer.
Thanks. Jerks.
In reality, Vash and 616 did exactly what the majority of us probably would have done. If you have the potential to gurantee your spot in the finals of an international tournament, would you have continued the match and possibly put yourself in the position where you could be eliminated later on? I know I wouldn't have. Yes, it completely screwed zerowing, but thats the game.
Totally right.
You can't blame them one bit.
To be fair, if you're playing in a tournament to win prizes, your first priority should be on getting as far as you can yourself, other players be damned. If calling a draw is the safest way to guarantee yourself a spot, and is allowed by the rules, what Vash/616 did was a smart move. The one-turn sleep was unfortunate, but that's "part of the game," and Vash did nothing wrong by capitalizing on it as much as possible.I am with zerowing on this one, they did not think of the consequences of their actions and acted foolishly.
Because he could have allowed a better smogoner (by his own words, he should have lost to zerowing) to get in to the top 4. I am with zerowing on this one, they did not think of the consequences of their actions and acted foolishly.
OK, if zerowing actually infracted vash because he caused him to lose, I think that's a little childish. While I understand being frustrated about what happened, I don't think power abuse is the right solution. Now moving on to what vash said, I don't think he (vash) was TRYING to force zerowing out. If anyone is insinuating that, I would disagree with them heartily. He was trying to be kind to sixonesix, but he did not think of the possible repercussions of his actions. In the end, I agree with Syberia. I would have rather Vash go for the win and knock both sixonesix and zerowing out than tie and knock zerowing out. Think of yourself, other people be damned.
OK, if zerowing actually infracted vash because he caused him to lose, I think that's a little childish.
All of them are good or they wouldn't have gotten their in the first place. I am upset that zerowing didn't make it in because I was here when everyone was trying for those spots last year. I think he did deserve a spot. Im just saying, Vash had the potential to help a fellow smogoner, which he did. Had he beaten 616, then that spot would have been left open to whoever had the highest percent, which could or could not have been a smogoner. It is for that reason, that I think that they must have been some thought process behind their decision. In the end, as its been said numerous times already, the game is one of luck. Zerowing lost to Vash through luck and it ended unfortunately for him. You can't expect someone to ruin their own chances for someone else and more importantly, you can't get mad at them for it. What would you have done in that situation?
How exactly did they calculate "Opponent's Win %"? I would have thought it was "number of times your opponents won" divided by "number of times your opponents battled" but that would always produce percentages that were a multiple of 4. I'm guessing they accounted for the margin of victory somehow?