That electric flying squirrel looks like an obvious pachirisu evo if I ever saw one
Just because it is a flying squirrel? I really wish people would stop crying evolution at everything.
The colours are off, body shape is off as well they do not share an ability. In addition, Emonga lacks many of the features of Pach. No teeth, ears are much different, no spikes, much smaller tail..
The Pikachu-esque pokes are always similar to each other, but save for Pichu they aren't directed related by evolution. They do share very many similarities however, typing for one. The cheeks as well. Interestingly enough they all have the same name in Japanese and English. I assume that "Emonga" will keep his name as well (it is a combinations of E-(electric) and Momonga (flying squirrel))
Plus, theres the whole thing about the Pokedex being made of of entirely new pokemon.. so it being a evolution is a bit of a stretch considering that the Pikachus are generally found early in the game. I wager that Emonga, too, will be caught fairly early on and have the same 405 BST as Pach, Minun and Plusle.
I understand the similarities.. but to call it an obvious evolution? Were Plusle and Minun obvious evolutions to the Pikachu line? Was Pachirisu?
EDIT: ninja'd a bit by PKMN Trainer Manson, but my point remains. Also, to retort his argument based on it being a squirrel.. There are pokemon such as Spheal and Seel who are similar in base but not related. As well, any number of water type fish. Even Mudkip and Wooper are based around a similar idea. Flying Squirrels and Squirrels are not the same animal, they are just related. It is no more a squirrel than it is a chipmunk, woodchuck or prairie dog.
2nd Edit: If I am correct in my assumption about Emonga, I then deduce that Shimama will evolve (not a new idea for me). The chances of having two single stage fairly weak electrics types that are caught pre-nat is unlikely. Come on Ixion-pokemon! :P