Thanks for clearing up the first part I was really confused as to how role PMs worked. I hate to bring experience into this, but I wouldn't consider me to be a "good player" (imo). This is my fourth mafia ever, and my first NOC one. Of course, that doesn't mean anything but if you want to bring up experience there ya go. That last sentence you posted is hilarious btw because you know why he lynched someone else. Oh wait, it can't have been beacuse OD posted telling everyone that Quagsires was confirmed scum! I was talking about before, you know, OD posted that Quagsires was scum. So don't really know what you were trying to prove there. And yes, I realize that activity =/= town, don't you think maybe voting inactives to put some pressure on them is a good idea too? Oh and you completely contradicted yourself with your edit. Activity does not equal cleanliness, but inactivity can be a scum tell? I'm not sure what you mean, but if you're trying to say that activity shouldn't be used to decide scum or town then I guess that makes a little more sense.You don't seem to get it:
Aura plays scummy -> we think he is scum-> you sub in for him -> you get his role pm -> if he was scum, then you are too. You personally may not be playing like scum, but that may be because you are a good player. None the less AG gave plenty of reasons to suspect him as scum, and that naturally falls on to you as his sub. And it's funny you say "you haven't given any though to another lynch target" when you quoted a post where he LYNCHED SOMEONE ELSE.
EDIT: And activity does not necessarily equal cleanliness. Inactivity may be a scum tell however since it implies someone trying to avoid attention.
All I'm saying is that it appeared to me that pokemaniac didn't consider anybody else but me before OD posted that bit on Quagsires.