No Metal Sonic this doesn't make sense. My role's one use is to block a non kill mafia role, we have "proof" of two mafia roles, one seem a very likely one time silence, that was used this very day, which actually I just realised, brings up a very interesting question. Either way if my one use is to maybe block a one time silence I'm eating my hat. I see no way that I couldn't block the hooker, and even if I couldn't, it doesn't clear up why I couldn't target you in the first place, your explanation is bullshit, as our very likely only inspector-like role other than our dear dead tracker revealing yourself as a power role was completely stupid. And finally, SHARE THE GODDAMN HOOKER FLAVOUR! I p much described my, I couldn't find you at home or anywhere safeguard result, so how about you give us the hooker's flavour who has been hooking you for 3 nights!
Now on the silence, there is something strange here. We are at LYLO. Mafia had someone silenced, leading to the vote going between 7 people, making 4 majority. So math says, 3 mafs if lylo? But wouldn't it be MYLO with out the silence? We know there can't be 4 mafs, I kind of doubt there is an anti village neutral, so there has to be 3 mafs. But in that case, it can only mean the silence can't be one time use, they have been saving it till MYLO to make it LYLO, so we don't catch on. But the host himself quickly confirmed it was a LYLO, so the silence is p much confirmed to be a not one time thing... This seems like a cunning plan... Tooooooo cunning, yes I'm looking at you AG. Also an interesting math I may want to point out. Eagle was voting Yoshinite for 2 days. 2 DAYS, Majority is 4, 3 mafs left. Mafia had all the time to win this in an instant and win this, by putting 3 votes Yoshinite and winning the game. This leads me to 3 possibilities. A Eagle is mafia and by extension they only had 2 more votes to put out, B Yoshinite is mafia so obviously they couldn't insta hammer, C Celever is mafia and they couldn't get 3 total votes. C can be true with either A or B, but I highly doubt A and B are both true, and at least 1 of A B C is true. Now I actually highly doubt C, it's an unneeded risk silencing a mafia buddy at this point, A if he gets lynched he can't defend himself which might save hides B He can't vote, risking a very easy insta win if a villager votes another villager C It actually cast more an more doubt on celever.
Celever may be mafia, but I do not want to make him a lynch today. Currently I'm leaning towards Eagle+AG. Why? Well fairly simple. I smell AG's cunning behind all this. As for the first A B C, I find A the most likely. Eagle basically openly denied the possibility of this being a LYLO early and left a vote on someone for 2 days. This seems very much like bidding his time till someone follows his vote so that his buddies may jump on it. I just can't see a villager not realising this math if they actually think about how LYLO works. The fact he changed his vote later and didn't unvote is another strike for him. Sure he voted AG for like 2 hours, but that may have been AG telling him to do that, nothing than a little attacking each other eh? This also happened p much after the host confirmed that it's LYLO, interesting coincidence.
ALAS, I WON'T VOTE, AND I EXPECT NO ONE TO FUCKING VOTE OR I WILL PERSONALLY RIP THEM TO LITTLE PIECES.
If there are truly 3 mafia members around able to vote, one wrong vote can mean an instant loss. Also may I remind how EVERYONE DEAD INSTANTLY SUSPECTED ME WHEN I PLACED MY VOTE VERY EARLY IN THE LYLO DAY OF THE LAST NOC GAME?????????? Yeah that's exactly what Eagle did, and it's not different in the slightest, 1 vote from a villager on another villager can mean an instant loss.
