If Pokemon X fits under an Uber clause, and you cannot show why Pokemon Y is different to Pokemon X, then it follows that Pokemon Y fits under the same Uber clause. This is where the comparison between Uber and OU comes into it. In this situation, many of the arguments for and against Salamence are the same that were for and against Garchomp, which makes it even more pertinent to make the comparison.
Saying that Salamence and Garchomp are so fundamentally similar as to be nigh indistinguishable is absurd. Even saying that they fit the same role is a stretch. There have already been pages of arguments on this thread which reference the differences between Mence and Chomp - speed, bulk, typing, and ability being the most glaring of the contrasts - differences which go beyond their somewhat similar stat spreads. Those arguments have yet to be undermined, so far as I can tell.









