The Pats have been in 5 or 6 of the 10 best superbowls of all timeThere have been plenty of big primetime games that were good without the pats. There have been good championship games without the pats too, mostly in the NFC since the Pats have basically been in every AFC Championship since 2004. The ones they haven't been in, like Ravens-Steelers in 2008, were extremely exciting. I may not agree, but many people also feel the Broncos-Seahawks super bowl was good only because of the epic slaughter delivered by Seattle upon the Broncos' historic offense.
We want the Pats to be bad because there are plenty of other teams who can be just as entertaining. The arrogance of that statement is astounding, even though we've already come to expect it from you.
I mean, since 2000 the best/most exciting/competitive non-pats superbowl aside from Steelers Cards is __________
its like rooting against Lebron to make the Finals, whatever team makes it over him sure as hell won't be as entertaining
Last edited: