• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

Wi-Fi Blacklist: as of January 30th, 2014

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry. I did hack them, I'll admit it. I want to breed legit but people are stingy about their breeding materials so I thought that I would try and trade for some. I'm telling the truth. If you look at all the trades that I've tried to set up, they've been for breeding materials.

I fucked up. I know I did. I'll trade back everything that I traded for. I'm sorry for trying to deceive you guys.
 
Lightsabre said:
not sure if he's been reported, but the owner of this thread http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52314

is trading hacks and claims they're not
Click to expand...

Ok, I've had a look into this, and spoke to the thread owner as well. Imo a blacklist is not appropriate, he just didnt exercise a bit of common sense thats all. Since he has removed the offending pokemon and later admitted he wasnt aware they were hacks, even having a hack check done (which as we should all know by now is not very reliable), I think its safe to say all that happened here was a lack of common sense.

And another thing, all you guys need to do is inform us that there is a possibility of hacks going around, there is no need for everyone to swarm into one thread and all go 'omg its a hacker'. Pointing out immediately obvious hacks (like a sextuple flawless legendary) is fine, but there's no need for everyone to act like their are picking on people, even when the person in question may be in the wrong. Just, have a little dignity for yourselves instead of making yourselves look like assholes, thats my point.
 
today i battled chompman my 383 attack choice band machamp stone edge him which is a 4x supper effective move against moltress and it still had about 10% health left. then my triple cursed steelix used stone edge on his umbreon and only did about 15% damage. On top of all that my machamp used stone edge on his garaydos and criticaled it and it only did about 30% damage. this kid must be hacking.
 
Krown Clown said:
today i battled chompman my 383 attack choice band machamp stone edge him which is a 4x supper effective move against moltress and it still had about 10% health left. then my triple cursed steelix used stone edge on his umbreon and only did about 15% damage. On top of all that my machamp used stone edge on his garaydos and criticaled it and it only did about 30% damage. this kid must be hacking.
Click to expand...

Bold bulky moltres
Bulky high def Umbreon
Bulky Gyrados

Can't prove hacking with that.
 
Krown Clown said:
today i battled chompman my 383 attack choice band machamp stone edge him which is a 4x supper effective move against moltress and it still had about 10% health left. then my triple cursed steelix used stone edge on his umbreon and only did about 15% damage. On top of all that my machamp used stone edge on his garaydos and criticaled it and it only did about 30% damage. this kid must be hacking.
Click to expand...
Krown Clown, you really need damage calcs to back up your argument here - expecially when things like Intimidate almost certainly come into the equation you can't expect people to know how much something will do off the top of their heads.

Also, have you spoken to champman about this at all, to see if his Pokemon were strange variations you haven't factored in? (highly defensive versions of all those Pokemon aren't uncommon) Coming to us should be a last resort when communication breaks down completly.
 
Krown Clown said:
today i battled chompman my 383 attack choice band machamp stone edge him which is a 4x supper effective move against moltress and it still had about 10% health left. then my triple cursed steelix used stone edge on his umbreon and only did about 15% damage. On top of all that my machamp used stone edge on his garaydos and criticaled it and it only did about 30% damage. this kid must be hacking.
Click to expand...

dang. but im sure you could've easily killed him anyways with that shiny rayquaza thats 3 points from flawless of yours. or maybe that shiny near flawless shiny dialga?

EDIT: formal report:
http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=52368

He claims that his dialga was sr'd in platinum in 8 days and is an english dialga, but the US platinum was leaked as a rom less than 8 days ago.

also, ditto claims that the rayquaza has illegitimite ivs.
 
In fact, none of those Pokemon have legal IVs. Glad to see common sense reigns supreme for once, this was a fairly obvious open-and-shut case.
 
Dragonknight08 said:
i've read the ar wrong before..apparently sometimes it doesn't go through, so it shows the last pokemon i checked's ivs..so if he checked a breed before checking the sr, then it is possible to have misread the ar.
Click to expand...

I know this is way delayed, but that would make since for an egg, but on a normal poke since the code makes the summary two pages instead of like 5 or whatever
 
I am LatiosMaster's Trade Partner and i am just posting this because the post by Steel_fan was deleted, it was said by Steel_Fan that he had stolen Latiosmaster's TRU Dragonite and is never coming back again.

Origionaly Posted by Fat Steel_fan

id like to report myself as i just stole latios masters tru dragonite and have no intentions of giving it back or ever coming to smogon again good day you mother fuckers
Click to expand...

I guess he was more of a steal fan than a steel fan.....
 
His post wasn't deleted, it was moved to Trou because it was kind of amazing lol.

He's already been added to the blacklist.
 
the thing with that is..steel_fan is probably going to illegally redis my brother's dragonite. which will suck, so people who are active on other forums should maybe watch out for that.
 
i would like to report

hacker2.jpg
Calf

Platinum FC - 4683 4467 6203

he had an illegal moveset - Aqua Jet and Belly Drum on Azumarill

I didnt have any recording footage - but hopefully get prove via pm
 
Dear smogon blacklist


before i am reported by smogon user bearfans, i would like2 explain the situation

I traded bearsfan a pokemon with false IVs. I used serebiis damage calclator and now am aware i received false IVs. The Cress was traded for his shiny timid Evee.

He Pmed me with a very rude and threatening message saying "Gimme my fucking Evee back, if not I will bitch about you in every trade. I replied calmy saying Id give it back and to ask him to give me a minute. "I honestly said in my 2nd reply "gimme a fucking minute! Then he replied I dont have time for for this, hurry the fuckup. I was experiencing Wifi troubles and still am. IWILL GET HIS EEVEE BACK ONCE WIFI TRUBLES ARE SOLVED
 
It seems there is a failure of that basic skill known as reading, so I'll repeat the rules here to be perfectly clear:

DO NOT POST UNLESS YOU ARE SOMEHOW INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT.

How many times must people be told before they actually put their glasses on? Its not like its hard to notice. So, for the hard of thinking, I'll repeat myself:

DO NOT POST UNLESS YOU ARE SOMEHOW INVOLVED IN THE INCIDENT.

Is everyone clear?
 
No Wishy, it was referring to a deleted post. Or do you have a guilty conscience and wish to share something?
 
Toothache said:
No Wishy, it was referring to a deleted post. Or do you have a guilty conscience and wish to share something?
Click to expand...

Ooh k, didn't see that post and I thought he was talking to me (Referring to my post about the PM I sent you <_<).

No but I am trying to find someone to check some shinies that I collected from GameFAQs, I guess anybody who can hack check doesn't check the simple requests topic often lol.
 
To be honest, hack checking is a very unreliable thing these days, what with the PID information being public knowledge. It was never an exact science to begin with tbh, but now it really cannot be relied on.

The quote in my sig says it all.
 
Toothache said:
To be honest, hack checking is a very unreliable thing these days, what with the PID information being public knowledge. It was never an exact science to begin with tbh, but now it really cannot be relied on.

The quote in my sig says it all.
Click to expand...

Very true, but I got these way back to when D/P was first released and I assume PID mumbo-jumbo was still uncharted territory. Though some are extremely fishy (Shiny Lugia with 23/23/23/23/23/23, probably a hack) it would be nice to at least weed out the definitely hacked ones (Said Lugia) and the ones that are probably legit (But with traded stuff, there is always a factor of things being hacked. A bit of PID and hex knowledge goes a long way).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top