Haha, it's the same for most enthusiats. The eternal cycle of:
- Discovery (Oh, what is this Pokémon Red game everybody speaks of?)
Can't argue with this, you have to discover it. Not much to say.
- Passion (I've caught them all, got two in level 100 and I'm buying Gold/Silver when it comes out)
- Addiction (Ruby and Sapphire were great, I'll buy Emerald too)
Both the same thing, really.
- Things change and now they suck (Oh, look at those ugly new Pokémon! Clearly Infernape is just a slightly changed Blaziken, and Dialga/Palkia don't look like Pokémon. Also, Sinnoh sucks)
Sinnoh DID suck. It added almost nothing new to the table, with most new pokemon being evolutions of pokemon you could only catch once you beat the game. The reason people hated it was because NOTHING changed.
- Rediscovery (HeartGold/SoulSilver! They take me ten years back to my childhood!)
Played gold/silver very few times, don't remember them from my childhood. Still great games.
- Discovery of fan base (Smogon? What's... oh, look, Pokémon fans who can spell! AND keep an intelligent discussion!)
Happened before Hg/SS to me, was awesome.
- Euphoria (I can play with all my favourite Pokémon at lvl 100 without grinding for hours to train them! Against thinking opponents too!)
Got that during the battle factory, but yes.
- Herd mentality (If I'm getting Black/White? Why do you ask? Everybody's getting it, duh!)
This never happened-after diamond/pearl's shittiness, i wanted to wait and see. Turns out these games weren't so great, so i may never buy one, or buy it cheap.
- Backlash (Those new Pokémon are UGLY! Ice creams? Garbage? Emboar?)
Never had a problem with this. Ugly or ripoff pokemon are a staple of the franchise.
- Cynicism (Charizard sucks. It has terrible typing, SR weakness and lacks usable STAB. Also, Vileplume is totally a joke and Entei is pathetic)
Was always cynical about pokemon, once i could understand it.
- Hype (Black/White 2? Looks...)
- Cynic hype (Two versions? Money-grabbing ********)
All pokemon hype to me is cynic hype.
- Competitive mentality (I want Roost and Close Combat tutors. And better AI. The games are too easy. GameFreak should watch where they're going, they may risk their truly devoted fans leaving them)
If the games were hard, they might risk their truly devoted fans-that is to say, small children-leaving them. Hell, i played platinum once and it was ridiculously hard-having higher levels, more evolved pokemon, and awesome TMS can only be balanced if the AI is stupid.Also, i do want competitive tutors.
- Grim accept (String Shot tutors? Lazy idiots. And why doesn't Gengar get Nasty Plot, again? It's a nasty plotter, for **** sake! I hate TrollFreak, they only do this to piss us off)
Always and forever.
- Hypocrisy (Laugh at newbies expecting new mechanics mid-generation. Rage at GameFreak for not fixing the "obviously broken" Stealth Rock. Dismiss all new Pokémon as ugly. Call for them to be banned as soon as you're beaten by a guy using them. Post lengthy rants at Nintendo sites/ fan sites explaining why the games, metagame and franchise now suck donkey ears. Post anti-Voltturn slogans in your signature, but admit to "being forced to use it" to advance on the ladder. Laugh loudly at ten-year olds wanting to use their favourites. Use the phrase "We're not a site centering on how to lose". Play the games regardless)
Of course you laugh at people who don't understand basic coding. I don't rage because it's not broken. They're not, and i don't call for bans from being beaten. I don't touch nintendo sites or volt-turn. I laugh at ten-year-olds because they should GTFO of competitive pokes. Never used that phrase. Play the hell out of the games.
- True sadness (Rant about other people's opinions on the forums)
You mean, true happiness.
Compare to... say, the construction phase of a popular roller coaster:
http://www.coasterforce.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29863
First, people hear the rumours. Dismiss them as "too good to be true" or "totally fake".
Then, evidence starts to pile up. Track appears on site. The same people are going ape dung over the possibilities of a "true force machine", or at the very least "it's about time they got a proper coaster".
Official announcement. Huge disappointment because it isn't the tallest/fastest/steepest out there, or there exists a ride which does "exactly the same" half the world away. Somebody are bound to comment on how short it is.
Construction begins. Comments like "Oh, how steep!" or "This looks like a very forceful corner" are thrown around.
Pictures of the trains are released. They are always stated to be "Ugly" or "uncomfortable", or both.
Themeing goes up. People will whine because it doesn't match the concept art.
First testing videos. The stock phase "It literally CRAWLS over those hills" are mandatory. A common variant is "It does nothing after the mid-course brake at all". Those people are usually the same who complained at the ride being too short.
Opening day. The ride is thorougly ridden by enthusiasts from all over the world. If it is generally acclaimed, a true enthusiast will bring up how much better this or that other coaster does the same things.
If it's a disappointment, they will laugh at everybody who "didn't see that coming". Then they will proceed to write lengthy prose on how much the ride sucks, and why. Reviews are often done turn for turn, element for element.
If it's generally regarded as terrible, they will start making jokes about how terrible it is. Or call people whiners and wuzzes and tell everybody how good it is, if you sit in the right front seat of the blue train on a sunny day late in the afternoon or something.
In later years when the coaster is brought up in a conversation, the views will often change. "It grew on me" is generally considered more mature than "I never said that". The phrase "I was just wrong" is NEVER seen.
I have examples.