Um ackchyually afaik of those Gliscor will be soon in the dlcThe trolling is real. Those Pokemon aren't even legal to play in-game. National Dex is in another thread, USUM OU is in another thread.
Feel free to nerd me
Um ackchyually afaik of those Gliscor will be soon in the dlcThe trolling is real. Those Pokemon aren't even legal to play in-game. National Dex is in another thread, USUM OU is in another thread.
We don't know yet, the only hope we have to fix the meta issues is that Game Freak adds good tutor moves and TM with a good distribution, I doubt that even +5 bans are going to be enough for people to consider the meta good because of how limited we are for some roles outside the top mons.yeah but it wont have defog or roost so shut up actually
Glowking killed it not only for how it walls it, but it also killed Toxic spikes as a whole which was one of the main things that made it worth running pre home, being one of the few not pasive t-spikes mons.Has anyone been using Iron Moth lately? I think it’s dropped off because of Gambit and Booster Valiant (Physical) and Glowking do a decent job holding it down. Mostly though it’s overall easy to revenge kill.
I’ve used it on a couple of my teams. I think its still pretty viable especially with booster energy.Has anyone been using Iron Moth lately? I think it’s dropped off because of Gambit and Booster Valiant (Physical) and Glowking do a decent job holding it down. Mostly though it’s overall easy to revenge kill.
Well ND tera suspect just ended with an insane amount of people that don't really care about the health of the tier coming in and flooding it with DNB. When our eventual resus happens, we really just going to let the same thing happen or are we going to implement some actual footmarks beside and easily accruable GXE and ELO?
Maybe just maybe the player base as a whole doesn't think it's busted and it's just the vocal minority on the forums who think it is?
I second this since we don’t really have an idea of how a tera-less metagame would be, and this is the best opportunity to test it.Hot take, but imo the only way to get an objective measurement for tera is to make the tera-test ladder tera-less. We need a tera-less ladder to get a feel for how much better the meta is going to be without it, and it will reduce the amount of brigading going on.
Yes I am implying that without tera as a crutch a lot of people won't be making reqs. Sue me.
Okay, seriously, what is vote manipulation to you, here? I think those users made a bad decision for the health of the meta but it's verified that they made reqs and they're allowed to vote however they like because of it.side note - now that I look at it, the NDOU tera suspect had a suspiciously large amount of people whose only activity was a DNB vote in the thread. Like 'nearly every DNB vote'. Maybe I'm a conspiracy theorist, but did anyone do a serious look into vote manipulation? Or does every suspect look like that and I just didn't both to check.
Okay, seriously, what is vote manipulation to you, here? I think those users made a bad decision for the health of the meta but it's verified that they made reqs and they're allowed to vote however they like because of it.
Why the h people still complaining tera is broken.
it’s clearly not.
when was the last time a Tera amoonguss, zapdos or meowscarada felt OP to you?
it’s a choice of whether you keep Tera and axe more Pokémon from OU. Or get rid of Tera and keep more Pokémon in OU.
Qualified players making a vote you don’t agree with is considered spamming now? People voting in the suspect test have won many games with few losses and thus are completely qualified to vote however they feel right for the meta? If you care so much about this then you should go meet the requirements to vote in the suspect. I’m anti-Tera as well and I can still see why this is wrong. Honestly how rude
If you are a qualified player and can get reqs for a suspect test, then they can vote however they want. Dont be mad only a minority of anti-tera players can get reqs.
Let's not pretend it isn't extremely easy to say "I'm voting do not ban can you forfeit" when you're about to lose, and that the average natdex kid won't treat you like Robin Hood and slam the forfeit button. I'd imagine most of the mysterious faceless "people who got recs" who never had accounts before used this method.
The more I click Hurricane with Zapdos and the more I get hurricane clicked on by Zapdos and (and other hurricane spammers, Zapdos is the most egregious just by nature of how good Zapdos is rn) the more I'm convinced that this move is extremely bullshit. It uniquely is the only viable widespread move (That I can think of) that has 3 separate RNG checks tied into it:
-It's innate 70% accuracy
-It's 30% chance to confuse
-Confusion's chance to self hit (33% percent)
Sure, on it's own these chances are too low to realistically change any outcomes--but Zapdos can click Hurricane a lot. And eventually you will get haxxed or hax with hurricane. It feels like any answer to Zapdos has to fight through the chances of hurricane hax and whenever you get confused by it your heart rate doubles.
Is it banworthy? No, it doesn't meet that threshold. Is it the most miserable thing in the world? Absolutely.
Well ND tera suspect just ended with an insane amount of people that don't really care about the health of the tier coming in and flooding it with DNB. When our eventual resus happens, we really just going to let the same thing happen or are we going to implement some actual footmarks beside and easily accruable GXE and ELO?
Lando is on the top 3 ugliest mons ever but we have had to deal with for so long, even in this gen when it isn't nearly as good as it was before.
People are mad at Lando cause he redefined beauty standards in BW OU