We did it guys! The hazard setter:remover ratio is now 11:3 instead of 12:3!
Gliscor's removal has posed an interesting question for the tier. What's better, having a Pokémon that centralizes viability and interactions for the whole tier completely around itself but also makes every team style viable, or a meta centralized around offense as the only usable archetype? I'm hoping that it's just a transitionary stage but as someone who doesn't really play offense I'm struggling to make anything work now. I know it's still early in the new meta. Spikes are still very overwhelming, in spite of removal becoming more realistic, and there are too many Pokémon that are too hard to switch into - a key issue right now is that Pokémon that ideally function as glue the way Gliscor did are very vulnerable to spikes, Fraud-Lu being a key example.
It feels like if we're to reach a balanced state and keep Gliscor out, Wellspring, Cheeseler, and Gholdengo all need to go at minimum. Wellspring is a very powerful wallbreaker that's absurdly difficult to switch into and knock off is a broken move in this meta, Gholdengo provides offense WAY too many ridiculous tools between its ability and access to nasty plot and trick, and the Purple Menace doesn't need any elaboration. Honestly even Cornerstone is worth considering once we're hopefully in a post-Wellspring world, and Kingambit will probably reach a point of being broken again at some point in this process as well - it already loves this most recent ban
I don't want this to come off as salt or complaining about the result because I completely agree that Gliscor was a very centralizing Pokémon that was extremely consequential for the teambuilder and its variety of progress-making options were overall very difficult to account for and navigate in battle, but I worry we may have banned a GSC Snorlax and have much more limited playstyle options as a consequence. I'm hoping gutting offense (maybe even taking away a Certain Mechanic that makes it absurdly powerful) is enough.
TLDR nerfing every archetype except for webs, glimmora HO, and grassy terrain has not made for a very satisfying meta thus far and I hope that changes
i like how corv has inexplicably managed to be a sorta-answer to every mon we've suspected post-dlc so far. it was one of the closest things we had to a bloodmoon check, the id set could in theory beat some roaring moon sets, it walled gliscor, and now it's one of the few semi-workable things we have against sneasler. never a perfect answer, far from the best, but always something to consider. it's like the burger king of ouThe main things that stops it rn is dozo (which hates rilla), mandibuzz (which tbf can shit on this core pretty well with an ID set), and corvi
i like how corv has inexplicably managed to be a sorta-answer to every mon we've suspected post-dlc so far. it was one of the closest things we had to a bloodmoon check, the id set could in theory beat some roaring moon sets, it walled gliscor, and now it's one of the few semi-workable things we have against sneasler. never a perfect answer, far from the best, but always something to consider. it's like the burger king of ou
This is why banning Gholdengo might be overall problematic for the tier in the short term. There's a lot of stuff carrying coverage specifically to deal with Gholdengo that gets unleashed with it's ban. In Snealser's case specifically, if you can run acro instead of shadow claw/lash out, now you can answer a Great Tusk instead of having to rely on tera and giving up one or the other.
Worth noting - Banning Gholdengo, while possibly necessarily, is going to make this problem exponentially worse. It's an omni-useful mon, but is also putting a large number of possibly problematic mons in check. There's more than a couple of mons that can fairly reliably be filed under 'possibly actionable, but suppressed by gholdengo'.
Worth noting - Banning Gholdengo, while possibly necessarily, is going to make this problem exponentially worse. It's an omni-useful mon, but is also putting a large number of possibly problematic mons in check. There's more than a couple of mons that can fairly reliably be filed under 'possibly actionable, but suppressed by gholdengo'.
I feel like it will fare worse than corvi is but probably will still be viable as a spiker.That mostly speaks to its type than anything else. Steel/Flying is one of the best types in the games and if Skarm is coming back (I can't remember if it was confirmed) I'm curious how the OG metal birb will fair.
Just because something is fun in the short term doesn't make it fun long term, this meta is a very good example of thatin one day we decided to go straight for sneasler despite the discussion of ghouldengo all week. honestly just QB both at this point why waste time. qb king too. and ogrepom. and manaphy. whoever else the council in their wisdom think will pop up next. cresselia sure idc.
but keep tera. bc its fun and people stopped playing gen8 due to its generation mechanic being banned. the bans may never end, but thats fine. OUBL/uubers is inevitable.
Sap Sipper H-Goodra:I know it’s a bit early to be thinking about this, but could Serperior possibly snowball into a problem once DLC 2 comes? Considering the 19th Tera type (Aura or something, idk) is presumably a completely-neutral typing, that means Serperior would get to spam STAB Leaf Storm plus completely unwallable and spammable STAB at the same time, while also getting rid of all of its weaknesses. Who even cares about Tera Fire or Tera Ice or Ground at that point? Just click the funny button and nothing walls you.
bc its fun and people stopped playing gen8 due to its generation mechanic being banned
I feel like it will fare worse than corvi is but probably will still be viable as a spiker.
Probably a UU Mon again but one that can be used here to fine effect.
Sneasler is WAY more broken than Gholdengo, especially now that Gliscor is banned and was one of its major roadblocks along with Gholdengo. Even without Dire Claw, it’d still be borderline broken, but it can always cheese wins no problem because Dire Claw can always screw your check over. It honestly even warrents discussion about sleep clause too.in one day we decided to go straight for sneasler despite the discussion of ghouldengo all week. honestly just QB both at this point why waste time. qb king too. and ogrepom. and manaphy. whoever else the council in their wisdom think will pop up next. cresselia sure idc.
but keep tera. bc its fun and people stopped playing gen8 due to its generation mechanic being banned. the bans may never end, but thats fine. OUBL/uubers is inevitable.
your train of thought is literally 'broken checks broken' which is smogon blasphemy. please atone.
Now the cascade of bans can continue
this cascade can’t stop, won’t stop.. can’t stop
- chop up sneasler, ghold still controversial
- Take out ghold, more attention goes to Ogerpon/kingambit
- Once ogerpon and gambit get the axe, manaphy is too overwhelming
- Manaphy gets cut out of OU, major discourse around booster energy is re-discussed, with valiant the hot topic
- Surprise cresselia suspect due to no more gambit, ghold, etc.
- OU community collectively realises what we were saying all along: keeping blind tera means banning 10+ Pokémon in a domino effect
- eventually we reach the “stale” point in the meta, where wall breaking is limited and defensive teams can pick a Tera to optimise for most offensive structures. Stall usage increases.
i don't think this part is accurate.this cascade can’t stop, won’t stop.. can’t stop
- Surprise cresselia suspect due to no more gambit, ghold, etc.
- OU community collectively realises what we were saying all along: keeping blind tera means banning 10+ Pokémon in a domino effect
- eventually we reach the “stale” point in the meta, where wall breaking is limited and defensive teams can pick a Tera to optimise for most offensive structures. Stall usage increases.
Oh that's why everyone talks shit about it.it's like the burger king of ou
Bro really missed the “Unwallable Tera Aura STAB”Sap Sipper H-Goodra:View attachment 570571