Lakers trade Radmanovic for two shitty players? WTF?
Good deal for the Bobcats, Radmanovic will get some serious minutes and should contribute well.
Again though, why? The Suns were a winning team under D'Antoni, but ever since (mainly) Kerr and Porter came along, they've gone from elite to...well, barely hanging in there. I mean, granted trading Marion for Shaq wasn't the best of ideas way back when, but Shaq has proven he's still effective. I mean seriously, look who we've sold our players to:Because there window has closed really and they need to blow up and rebuild
Again though, why? The Suns were a winning team under D'Antoni, but ever since (mainly) Kerr and Porter came along, they've gone from elite to...well, barely hanging in there. I mean, granted trading Marion for Shaq wasn't the best of ideas way back when, but Shaq has proven he's still effective. I mean seriously, look who we've sold our players to:
Heat (sucky team): Marion
Bobcats (even worse than Miami): Bell and Diaw
What's next? Stoudamire to the Grizzlies? Barbosa to the Timberwolves? Why the heck are we trading good talent to horrid teams for their "star" players, whose stats are probably padded by the fact they play for the worse teams out there, and likely get the ball more than their other sucky teammates? I'll admit, even I've never bought into Stoudamire much, but trading him is still a bad move, as he is a good player. Bell was one of the better defenders for the Suns, and for a coach who wanted to improve upon defense, why trade one of your better defenders for someone who really isn't? Diaw...eh...still never liked him much after the 05 season tbh, though it looks like he's doing good with the Bobcats.
Well, I agree with you on the Shaq part; I've always liked Shaq, and it was a thrill to get him. I just wish we hadn't given up Marion for him, even if he was turning into a bit of a whiner...Personally, I actually liked the Shaq trade because it gave the Suns the option of fast break or run the offense through Shaq. What happened when Kerr came in is that he started to override the way D'Antoni coached: he started making rules, running practices, and essentially coaching the team himself, and that's why D'Antoni left for New York. Kerr, Suns' Ownership, and the fans got so greedy for a championship that they completely changed the team's identity when all they actually had to do was get some depth into the rotation, and that's why the team is in the state it's in today.
Now Kerr doesn't have choice but to rebuild, because the players aren't buying into the Terry Porter/Steve Kerr system, and it doesn't fit what they have. Terry Porter isn't going anywhere because that would be an admission of a mistake by the GM and owner, which doesn't happen. They know that Stoudamire can walk in 2010 and that he isn't going to re-sign with them, and they may let Steve Nash go after this year because he's slated to make a lot of money if they decide to keep him. They've also got Shaq, who will be making $20 million, and that contract's not going anywhere.
I also think the economy and the struggles in NBA attendance don't help. I think what hurts the NBA more is how much they overpay bad players.
:[. That missed dunk was terrible.I am so embarrassed to be a Rockets fan after last night.
Good or bad thing for the Rockets? :P:[. That missed dunk was terrible.
Sad part is, Tracy's career may be over due to some missing cartilage in his knee.
Well, I agree with you on the Shaq part; I've always liked Shaq, and it was a thrill to get him. I just wish we hadn't given up Marion for him, even if he was turning into a bit of a whiner...
I also agree, Kerr is the main problem, he is hurting far more than he's ever helped, why the heck did we get him for? Ugh...I miss the old Suns, back when watching them was fun.