I must admit that I LOVE Loom as a poke to help deal with other weathers, but I would just advise that you keep in mind its moderate fragility. Scarf Politoed can possibly 2HKO you with Hydro Pump, so it's always important to know thatOh well, its started with shubarugo Ttar comparison then somebody say why you sue skarm anyway when someone say ttar 2HKO skarm with Stone miss. Fun time
About suspect lets discuss about Sun, or lets say the future of sun team.
I just found an idea to slap breelom on sun team
In theory, sun's biggest weakness is ninetales lose to every other weather summoner. SO, Breelom can handle most of the common weather summoner. It resist SR and enjoy the fire resistance the team have. It Resist Tar's STAB and able to get free sub fairly easily from most summoner. It outspeed Ttar, Hippo and most Politoed and get free sub/spore on them. Aboma is outsped and OHKO by common fire move user in sun team namely the ninetales itself(beware no switch in or you risk EQ, Punch etc), heatran, ken, etc.
It might work
I know, but it can also miss, so Loom still has a 28% of surviving and OHKOing with Bullet SeedActually, scarf Toed's Surf 2hkos Loom easily, iirc it does like 65%.
Since when does Surf miss? Unless you're doing something weird like Brightpowder.I know, but it can also miss, so Loom still has a 28% of surviving and OHKOing with Bullet Seed
Oops thought he was talking about Hydro Pump. In that case, yeah, Scarf Surf Politoed can beat you, but Hydro Pump has a 28% of losing to youSince when does Surf miss? Unless you're doing something weird like Brightpowder.
This is me assuming that most rain teams don't use spikes and/or stealth rockHydro Pump from Scarf Politoed has a chance of OHKOing you with SR and Spikes.
but rarely with spikes and sr. I'm not arguing here, I'm just saying that if you run Breloom ot counter rain, you have a very low chance of being able to switch in on even the weakest attacks, and you need some pretty major significant hax to succeed that wayNattorei is on almost 100% of rain teams -_-.
...What?but rarely with spikes and sr.
Just in my experience, most Nats in rain run leech seed + sr/spikes, and rarely both at the same time. Yet that is neither conclusive nor extremely relevant. The point being that Breloom can rarely counter rain straight out, even WITHOUT spikes and sr, and the existence of either (or both) only makes his job harder...What?
Please give evidence to support this.
Or just retest Manaphy under the provision of Hydration + Drizzle being banned. Aldaron's proposal indicates that other combinations of weather-causing abilities and weather-using abilities could fall under the same exception as Swift Swim + Drizzle.I personally am just looking forward to Drizzle to be banned so we can retest Manaphy in a Drizzle-less metagame. Few will argue that 8 Turn Rain is any easier to use and maintain than it was in 4th gen, and with Manaphy forced to support itself it becomes far easier to check, to the point where it is not broken outside of Drizzle-induced rain, IMO.
Or just retest Manaphy under the provision of Hydration + Drizzle being banned. Aldaron's proposal indicates that other combinations of weather-causing abilities and weather-using abilities could fall under the same exception as Swift Swim + Drizzle.
Such bans are not a slippery slope; they fall completely within the scope of the proposal. So far, no Pokemon have been found to become broken if they make use of the combination of Sand Stream + Sand Throw / Sand Power, and yet we've seen a Pokemon that has displayed being broken with the combination of Drizzle + Hydration. Therefore, we need to find out if it will be beneficial to the metagame to allow Manaphy back into the metagame while away from rain teams at the expense of barring Hydration Vaporeon and a few other things from rain teams. If it is, we should go for it.I don't agree with this. Swift Swim is MUCH more widespread than Hydration, meaning that banning the swimmers would mean banning like 15 pokemon until we got to Luvdisc level. It is one of the reasons why Aldaron's Proposal followed through.
If Manaphy is the only thing that effectively uses Hydration, then it needs to be the one to go (and the fact that it is really the only Hydration user around besides maybe Vaporeon indicates that it is, in fact, the only effective user).
And while I'm not referring to you in particular, this very same "slippery slope" argument is what some of the opponents of the proposal feared. Why don't we just ban SandStream + Sand Strength/Sand Rush? Drought + Solar Power? They haven't really been broken so far, so it wouldn't be the proper course of action. This argument has been done to death, though (the argument over the proposal in general, I mean), so let's not revive it.
Manaphy isn't forced to support itself.I personally am just looking forward to Drizzle to be banned so we can retest Manaphy in a Drizzle-less metagame. Few will argue that 8 Turn Rain is any easier to use and maintain than it was in 4th gen, and with Manaphy forced to support itself it becomes far easier to check, to the point where it is not broken outside of Drizzle-induced rain, IMO.
Or just retest Manaphy under the provision of Hydration + Drizzle being banned. Aldaron's proposal indicates that other combinations of weather-causing abilities and weather-using abilities could fall under the same exception as Swift Swim + Drizzle.
Waitwaitwait. This is obvious bull. That provision was made because it was a way of avoiding banning several Pokemon. You're trying to use this precedent to justify a significant rules change to avoid banning ONE Pokemon. That's not okay, especially because it bans Hydration Vaporeon as well, which is a viable OU Pokemon that has not been proven broken. This is as bad as banning Sand Veil/Snow Cloak to make Garchomp weaker. The problem is with the Pokemon, not the ability. If Hydration+rain was inherently broken on anything OTHER THAN Manaphy, then Vaporeon would be broken. If you can prove Vaporeon to be broken with it, then sure, I'll go along with you. Until then, don't suggest such an incredibly harmful precedent.