Sorry guys, you're never on #ubers and I really need to say this.
Not to down the project (I'm a part of it for christ's sake), but right now I think it's a joke. It's highly disorganized and isn't being taken "seriously." I highly doubt that a lot of the "completed" tests were A) extensive and B) really serious. Probably 2-3 battles and the stamp has been put on some of these. And those battles might not have even been against decent players. Another thing; I'm sure a lot of theorymon is thrown into some pokemon (agian, with limited field testing). Damage calcs don't mean squat, nor does having just the right moves; neither of those factors means it works for sure, and you can't undertest just because "it should work." Electivire can 2HKO a lot of common walls, but that doesn't make him good (ask anybody). Sure, a couple of battles can show you some things like if it's worth a bother, but theorymoning the rest of the results is utter bull. I've battled with Kingdra quite a bit, did good here and not so hot there; you don't see me slapping the stamp of approval on there and moving on.
I'm not trying to disrespect anybody that is working hard to get real results, but this is ridiculous. Post you're saying something, 2 hours later you post a result and call another one (exaggerated time frame maybe, but you get the point). This isn't a damn race, or is there a time limit. Suspect tests don't last 1 week, even if you can short-test the thing and theorymon the rest to gain an opinion in that short time.
This whole experiment needs reevaluated. It reminds me of the simple moveset thread. Most results are poor, incomplete, and can't be taken for real.
EDIT: Yes, I know there are some satisfactory results, and this isn't aimed at them so don't start throwing them at me.