• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!
Lumari
Reaction score
49,435

Profile posts Postings About

  • http://www.smogon.com/dex/bw/pokemon/samurott/ would you mind taking a look at this? i dont think the p tags are supposed to be there (unreleased section) but ive seen them on other bw analyses too (articuno i think) so i don really know. also on samurott's the list of moves under "Moves" is missing for some reason
    Lumari
    Lumari
    done... yeah those <p> tags are a relic from when the dex used html and should just be removed when you see them (already did articuno), i'm assuming the html tags were removed through some script when the new dex was set up and that that script missed unreleased sections. and re. moves, there was a stray line that said
    - []
    in its move listing in the pokemon file, which essentially says that it had no moves in its native generation. i removed that one and it's all good now
    Haund
    Haund
    cool!
    sorry been meaning to implement gp but i only have access to my phone at work and... it's not good to implement gp in lol
    Lumari
    Lumari
    yeah phones tend to have that problem haha
    btw rodan's probs givin up his spot in the debate
    Lumari
    Lumari
    welp, guess we'll need a new dude... passed it on to skylight, ty for lettin me know
    Lumari
    Lumari
    if it is, it's not a very funny one lol. don't see a real reason to assume it would be? just an analysis for an unviable mon...
    Sobi
    Sobi
    uh the set was gimmicky, saying that it's terrible, etc.. but i'll change my check then
    Lumari
    Lumari
    yeah, sorry :[ but it's happened before that people incorrectly assumed something was a joke analysis, actual joke analyses are really unambiguous (bad sets, not just gimmicky ones, or funny writing) etc
    Lumari
    Lumari
    glanced over it now, sorry! the stuff you missed you should be able to glance from gato's / my checks, and re. your changes, the objective ones appeared good... only things that i'd like to point out were the fluff thing in the overview (it's not a matter of "i guess this technically can be removed", it's a matter of "the extra words are harmful here", which wasn't the case afaik, on the contrary actually), and the it -> Exploud change in Moves ("it" fulfills the same function in the second part of the sentence as "Exploud" did in the first part, so intuitively it's pretty clear that Exploud is meant. and excessive names are ugly. not a big issue though)
    Hi, I've been working incrementally on an amcheck for Landorus-T in DOU. Is it okay if I try to finish what I have and post it? (I saw your reservation and I've been working for a while now). If I can, how long can you wait for me to finish it?
    Hello, on a GP check you did for MDiancie (AG) you said (add hypen) in red and crossed out. Does that mean to remove the hyphen that was there or was it just a mistake? The word was switch-ins in case that helps
    Lumari
    Lumari
    nah, there should be a hyphen, sounds like you left the first checker's "add hyphen" comment in
    InfernapeTropius11
    InfernapeTropius11
    ah ok, thank you for clarifying that :)
    Lumari
    Lumari
    i quickly glanced over it, couple tiny things that were a tad much, but looked good overall :) didn't have time for more thorough feedback + couldn't go over it myself cause i did the first check, but it looks like frenzy got you covered there
    Eien
    Eien
    Yeah, I reviewed frenzy's feedback. Thanks anyway!
    What do you mean by "OK"?
    Aberforth
    Aberforth
    Ahh ok then makes sense.
    Lumari
    Lumari
    done~
    and yeah maybe i should stop placeholdering using "ok", at one point i also had someone counting it as an approval :[
    Aberforth
    Aberforth
    yeah I wasn't sure if that OK meant that the work the other guy did was enough lol.
    I'm back with yet another question. Do you think this change is justifiable:
    "Heat Wave is a STAB spread move that can hit both Pokemon on the opposing side" -> "Heat Wave can hit both Pokemon on the opposing side".
    I was told that saying WHAT a move is, is just extraneous information, so would you have made that change?
    Sobi
    Sobi
    but "..AND CAN easily OHKO it, AND CAN chip away" - surely there's no need to be repeating "can" in the second part.
    Lumari
    Lumari
    ", and it deals a minimum of 70% to the offensive set with the combination of Fake Out and Sucker Punch while also wasting sand turns" if that's the issue... the most important thing is not fusing those two parts together in any case, because they discuss different sets
    Sobi
    Sobi
    oh okay, thank you n_n
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top