i don't understand how anyone reads von's posts and can go "yeah man that is a well-formulated argument that makes logical sense!"
like
"When pressed about the Cancerous lynch, rather than defend himself, he tells everyone that I was never against it."
this is untrue given that you never pressed me on shit
"After it takes an eternity to expose his lie, he twists his argument to being about how I should have tried harder to prevent the lynch, like I should have flown to people's houses and typed no lynch into their computer or something."
this is a blatant misrepresentation of what i was saying at all so either von reads at the first grade level (maybe too generous) or is mafia and recognizes that a villager who truly felt the cancerous lynch was bad would have done more to stop it which you did not. you haven't exposed any lie whatsoever lol.
"The pattern is obvious; he's trying to throw the blame for his lynch on someone else. But the sheer lengths he has gone to for this is staggering."
wat - what do you mean "sheer" lengths. i've barely done anything this day except argue with your backwards logic (considering that i have v. little incentive to do much else given that no one is paying attention to my posts)
"We're lynching him for his Day 2 behavior, and for the fact that he instigated and provided much of the bad logic for the Cancerous lynch (and is now lynching Pokeguy for the same reasons)."
Dude you literally make no sense. You sit here and use sensationalist language to make up for the fact that ultimately you don't pay attention to anything I say or actually try to have a constructive dialogue. BTW this right here is a blatant lie considering that I said I would vote pokeguy purely for self-preservation purposes. i explicitly said that i did not really like a pokeguys lynch. for someone who routinely calls people liars, you are clearly lying as justification for a lynch.
von is literally making up shit that didn't happen to lynch me. it looks really weak - i'm sure there's a case for me, but when von says im mafia due to 1. "lying" (when he hasn't even expressed what the lie was) 2. due to starting a lynch day 1 (which doesn't make sense either because villagers are supposed to try and lynch mafia which I did [notwithstanding "bad logic" but evidently von didn't give enough of a shit to defend cancerous even while "knowing" it was a bad lynch])
his willingness to lynch me after someone proposes it is pretty scummy as well considering i have been "blatantly lying" this whole time but as soon as amianki proposes it, it becomes ok? what?
like
"When pressed about the Cancerous lynch, rather than defend himself, he tells everyone that I was never against it."
this is untrue given that you never pressed me on shit
"After it takes an eternity to expose his lie, he twists his argument to being about how I should have tried harder to prevent the lynch, like I should have flown to people's houses and typed no lynch into their computer or something."
this is a blatant misrepresentation of what i was saying at all so either von reads at the first grade level (maybe too generous) or is mafia and recognizes that a villager who truly felt the cancerous lynch was bad would have done more to stop it which you did not. you haven't exposed any lie whatsoever lol.
"The pattern is obvious; he's trying to throw the blame for his lynch on someone else. But the sheer lengths he has gone to for this is staggering."
wat - what do you mean "sheer" lengths. i've barely done anything this day except argue with your backwards logic (considering that i have v. little incentive to do much else given that no one is paying attention to my posts)
"We're lynching him for his Day 2 behavior, and for the fact that he instigated and provided much of the bad logic for the Cancerous lynch (and is now lynching Pokeguy for the same reasons)."
Dude you literally make no sense. You sit here and use sensationalist language to make up for the fact that ultimately you don't pay attention to anything I say or actually try to have a constructive dialogue. BTW this right here is a blatant lie considering that I said I would vote pokeguy purely for self-preservation purposes. i explicitly said that i did not really like a pokeguys lynch. for someone who routinely calls people liars, you are clearly lying as justification for a lynch.
von is literally making up shit that didn't happen to lynch me. it looks really weak - i'm sure there's a case for me, but when von says im mafia due to 1. "lying" (when he hasn't even expressed what the lie was) 2. due to starting a lynch day 1 (which doesn't make sense either because villagers are supposed to try and lynch mafia which I did [notwithstanding "bad logic" but evidently von didn't give enough of a shit to defend cancerous even while "knowing" it was a bad lynch])
his willingness to lynch me after someone proposes it is pretty scummy as well considering i have been "blatantly lying" this whole time but as soon as amianki proposes it, it becomes ok? what?
