rant
None of that has anything to do with what I am saying. All I am stating is a simple fact and my analysis of it:
1) Some teams that get the ball first would win regardless of equal chances.
2) Some teams that get the ball first would lose if the other team had a chance afterward.
3) Thus teams lose directly because of not getting a chance.
For you to deny that is factually incorrect. Yes, teams would also win if they "just played defense", but that does not matter. That a team would win having their chance loses means teams lose directly to not receiving the ball. All I was doing was addressing your incorrect claim.
If rewording helps, then take it as it is now. The game ends, team B loses never receiving the ball because of their "poor defense" (because obviously being scored on means you are not playing defense well). However, team B would have won despite whatever their defensive efforts were if they had their chance next. Thus team B lost solely to not having a chance since their defense would not matter.













